Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2003 Mar;47(3):1140–1142. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.3.1140-1142.2003

Postantibiotic Effects of Garenoxacin (BMS-284756) against 12 Gram-Positive or -Negative Organisms

G A Pankuch 1, M R Jacobs 2, P C Appelbaum 1,*
PMCID: PMC149305  PMID: 12604557

Abstract

Conventional in vitro methods were used to determine the postantibiotic effects (PAEs), sub-MIC effects (SMEs), and postantibiotic sub-MIC effects (PA-SMEs) of garenoxacin for a range of organisms. The mean PAEs of garenoxacin for pneumococci, staphylococci, and enterococci were 0.3 to 2.2 h. For Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the PAEs were 0.9 to 1.6 h. The mean PA-SMEs (0.4 times the MIC) for pneumococci, staphylococci, and enterococci were 3.0 to >10 h, 1.8 to >10.7 h, and 5.8 h, respectively, while those for E. coli and P. aeruginosa were 7.6 and 4.4 h, respectively.


The postantibiotic effect (PAE) is a pharmacodynamic parameter that may be considered when choosing antibiotic dosing regimens. It is defined as the length of time that bacterial growth is suppressed following brief exposure to an antibiotic (2-4, 7). Odenholt-Tornqvist and coworkers have suggested that during intermittent dosage regimens, suprainhibitory levels of antibiotic are followed by subinhibitory levels that persist between doses, and they have hypothesized that persistent subinhibitory levels could extend the PAE. The effect of sub-MIC concentrations on growth during the PAE period has been defined as the postantibiotic sub-MIC effect (PA-SME), representing the time period that includes the PAE plus the additional time during which growth is suppressed by sub-MIC concentrations. In contrast to the PA-SME, the sub-MIC effect (SME) is a measure of the direct effect of subinhibitory levels on cultures which have not been previously exposed to antibiotics (10, 11).

We examined the PAEs, PA-SMEs, and SMEs of garenoxacin (BMS-284756; T-3811), a broad-spectrum quinolone lacking the C-6 fluorine of some other fluoroquinolone agents (1, 5, 6, 12, 13). We studied two strains each of penicillin-susceptible, -intermediate, and -resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (all quinolone susceptible with levofloxacin MICs of ≤2.0 μg/ml); one strain of Enterococcus faecalis; one methicillin-susceptible and one methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain (both with garenoxacin MICs of ≤1.0 μg/ml, but one strain being susceptible and one resistant to ciprofloxacin); one Escherichia coli strain; and one Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain. Organisms were identified by standard methods (8).

Garenoxacin MICs were determined by macrodilution procedures (9). The garenoxacin MICs were as follows: 0.03 to 0.06 μg/ml for pneumococci, 0.03 to 0.5 μg/ml for staphylococci, 0.25 μg/ml for E. faecalis, 0.06 μg/ml for E. coli, and 1.0 μg/ml for P. aeruginosa. The garenoxacin MIC for the ciprofloxacin-susceptible S. aureus strain was 0.03 μg/ml, and that for the ciprofloxacin-resistant S. aureus strain was 0.5 μg/ml.

The PAE was determined by the viable plate count method (4) by using Mueller-Hinton broth supplemented with 5% lysed horse blood when pneumococci were tested. The PAE was induced by exposure to 10 times the MIC of garenoxacin for 1 h, except in experiments with the P. aeruginosa isolate, where six times the MIC was used. The latter two concentrations were chosen so as not to exceed the approximate maximally achievable total serum levels of 6.9 to 7.8 μg/ml for all strains (14; C. Stewart, D. Gajjar, A. Bello, L. Christopher, D. Hollenbaugh, Z. Ge, and D. Grasela, Abstr. 41st Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. A-46, 2001).

For PAE testing, tubes containing 5 ml of broth with antibiotic were inoculated with approximately 5 × 106 CFU/ml. Inocula were prepared by suspending growth from an overnight blood agar plate in broth. Growth controls with inoculum but no antibiotic were included with each experiment. Inoculated test tubes were placed in a shaking water bath at 35°C for an exposure period of 1 h. At the end of the exposure period, cultures were diluted 1:1,000 in prewarmed broth to remove the antibiotic. Antibiotic removal was confirmed by comparison of growth curves of a control culture containing no antibiotic with those of another containing garenoxacin at 0.001 times the exposure concentration.

Viable counts were determined before exposure and immediately after dilution (0 h) and then every 2 h until the turbidity of the tube reached a no. 1 McFarland standard. The PAE was defined as follows: PAE = TC, where T is the time required for the viable counts of an antibiotic-exposed culture to increase by 1 log10 unit above the counts observed immediately after dilution and C is the corresponding time for the growth control (4).

In cultures designated for PA-SME experiments, the PAE was induced as described above after exposure to garenoxacin at 6 or 10 times the MIC (see above). Following 1:1,000 dilution, cultures were divided into four tubes. Garenoxacin was added to three tubes to produce final subinhibitory concentrations of 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 times the MIC. The fourth tube did not receive antibiotic. Viable counts were determined before exposure, immediately after dilution, and then every 2 h until the culture turbidity of the tubes reached a no. 1 McFarland standard. SME experiments were performed in the same manner as for PA-SME experiments, except that the PAE was not induced in cultures designated for SME experiments.

The PA-SME was defined as follows: PA-SME = TpaC, where Tpa is the time required for the viable counts of cultures previously exposed to antibiotic and then reexposed to different sub-MIC concentrations to increase by 1 log10 unit above the counts observed immediately after dilution and C is the corresponding time for the unexposed control (10, 11). The SME was defined as follows: SME = TsC, where Ts is the time required for the viable counts of cultures exposed only to sub-MIC concentrations to increase by 1 log10 unit above the counts seen immediately after dilution and C is the corresponding time for the unexposed control. The PA-SME and SME (10, 11) were measured in two separate experiments. For each experiment, viable counts (log10 CFU per milliliter) were plotted against time and the results are expressed as the mean of two separate assays.

The results are presented in Table 1. The PA-SMEs were longer than the PAEs for all strains tested and increased with the subinhibitory concentration of garenoxacin. For the six pneumococci, the mean PAE was 1.2 h and PAEs ranged between 0.8 and 2.2 h. At 0.4 times the MIC, the PA-SMEs for the two penicillin-susceptible strains were 5.0 and >9.4 h and that for one penicillin-resistant strain was 5.2 h. These PA-SMEs were greater than the sums of the corresponding PAEs and SMEs for these strains. For the remaining three strains, at 0.4 times the MIC, the PA-SMEs were 3.0 to >10 h, with PA-SME values being similar to the PAE plus SME values.

TABLE 1.

PAEs, SMEs, and PA-SMEs of garenoxacin against 12 strains

Straina Mean effect (h)b
PAE 0.2× MIC
0.3× MIC
0.4× MIC
SMEc PA-SMEd SME PA-SME SME PA-SME
Pen-S S. pneumoniae 1.2 (0.8-1.6) 1.0 (0-2.0) 3.4 (2.2-4.5) 1.2 (0.5-2.0) 4.7 (4.3-5.1) 1.8 (1.1-2.4) 5.0 (4.3-5.6)
Pen-S S. pneumoniae 2.2 (2.0-2.5) 2.6 (2.4-2.9) 3.2 (2.5-3.9) 3.3 (3.3-3.3) ≥8.4 (6.9->9.8) 4.2 (3.5-4.8) >9.4 (>9.4->9.4)
Pen-I S. pneumoniae 1.6 (1.5-1.8) 1.8 (1.5-2.1) 2.2 (1.9-2.6) 1.6 (1.3-1.8) 2.4 (1.9-2.8) 2.0 (1.6-2.3) 3.0 (2.9-3.1)
Pen-I S. pneumoniae 1.2 (0.8-1.6) 0.8 (0.4-1.1) 1.1 (0.8-1.4) 1.3 (1.3-1.3) 2.2 (2.2-2.3) 2.4 (2.4-2.5) 3.1 (3.0-3.1)
Pen-R S. pneumoniae 0.8 (0.5-1.0) 1.7 (1.5-1.9) 2.2 (1.8-2.6) 3.7 (3.5-3.9) 6.2 (5.8-6.6) ≥10 (10-≥10.2) >10 (>10->10.2)
Pen-R S. pneumoniae 0.3 (0-0.6) 0.4 (0.3-0.5) 0.7 (0.3-1.1) 1.2 (1.1-1.3) 1.4 (1.1-1.6) 1.2 (1.1-1.3) 5.2 (5.1-5.3)
E. faecalis 1.0 (0.3-1.6) 0.7 (0.6-0.8) 2.4 (1.3-3.4) 2.0 (1.9-2.0) 3.4 (2.7-4.0) 3.8 (3.8-3.8) 5.8 (4.8-6.9)
Meth-S S. aureus 0.8 (0.7-0.8) 1.3 (1.0-1.6) 2.2 (1.9-2.6) 2.9 (2.1-3.7) 7.7 (6.7-8.7) >10.7 (>10.7->10.7) >10.7 (>10.7->10.7)
Meth-R, cipro-S S. aureus 0.6 (0.6-0.7) 0.3 (0.3-0.3) 1.3 (1.2-1.4) 0.6 (0.5-0.8) 2.2 (1.5-2.8) 0.9 (0.5-1.3) 4.3 (4.0-4.6)
Meth-R, cipro-R S. aureus 0.6 (0.1-1.2) 0.3 (0.2-0.4) 1.0 (0.9-1.2) 0.3 (0.2-0.4) 1.2 (1.1-1.2) 1.1 (0.4-1.8) 1.8 (1.3-2.2)
E. coli 0.9 (0.8-1.0) 1.1 (0.7-1.5) 2.8 (2.4-3.3) 2.2 (2.0-2.5) 4.6 (4.2-5.1) 4.5 (4.0-5.0) 7.6 (7.5-7.8)
P. aeruginosa 1.6 (1.2-2.1) 1.6 (1.2-1.9) 2.7 (2.5-2.9) 2.2 (2.0-2.3) 4.0 (4.0-4.0) 3.8 (3.2-4.4) 4.4 (4.0-4.9)
a

Pen-S, Pen-I, and Pen-R, penicillin-susceptible, -intermediate, and -resistant, respectively; Meth-S and Meth-R, methicillin-susceptible and -resistant, respectively; cipro-S and cipro-R, ciprofloxacin-susceptible and -resistant, respectively.

b

Values are means of two separate experiments. Values in parentheses are ranges. Strains were exposed to 6 to 10 times the MIC of garenoxacin (see text) for 1 h at 35°C. The drug was removed by 1:1,000 dilution.

c

Strains were not previously exposed to garenoxacin.

d

Strains were previously exposed to garenoxacin.

PAEs for staphylococci were 0.6 to 0.8 h, with a mean of 0.7 h. These PAEs did not differ greatly (0.6 to 0.8 h) between methicillin-susceptible and -resistant S. aureus strains. For the ciprofloxacin-susceptible, methicillin-resistant strain, the PA-SME at 0.4 times the MIC (4.3 h) was longer than the sum of the PAE and SME. For the ciprofloxacin-resistant, methicillin-resistant strain, the PA-SME was not found to be increased compared with the SME (1.8 and 1.1 h, respectively) at 0.4 times the MIC. For the methicillin-susceptible strain, a very long PA-SME of >10.7 h at 0.4 times the MIC corresponded to an equally long SME. For E. faecalis, the garenoxacin PAE was 1.0 h and the PA-SME at 0.4 times the MIC was 5.8 h.

For E. coli and P. aeruginosa, the PAEs were 0.9 and 1.6 h, respectively. For E. coli, the PA-SMEs were generally greater than the sums of the PAEs and SMEs at all subinhibitory concentrations. For the strain of P. aeruginosa, the PA-SME at 0.4 times the MIC was 4.4 h, which was not greater than the sum of the PAE and SME (5.4 h).

The garenoxacin MICs were similar to those described previously (1, 5, 6, 12, 13). Garenoxacin, like other quinolones, exhibits rapid concentration-dependent bactericidal activity. Longer intervals between doses may be possible when an antibiotic has a long half-life as well as a prolonged PAE and PA-SME, because regrowth continues to be prevented when serum and tissue levels fall below the MICs (2, 4, 10, 11).

In this study, the sums of the PAEs and SMEs were less than the PA-SMEs at 0.4 times the MIC for two penicillin-susceptible and one penicillin-resistant pneumococcal strain and one methicillin-resistant, ciprofloxacin-susceptible S. aureus strain, indicating that for these organisms (and not the two penicillin-intermediate pneumococcal strains, the ciprofloxacin-resistant, methicillin-resistant S. aureus strain, and the P. aeruginosa strain), the sub-MIC concentrations of garenoxacin had a greater effect on preexposed cultures than on unexposed cultures. The PAE and PA-SME would only be important for organisms for which the MICs are high, where serum levels (at least of free drug) would fall below the MIC. This would not occur with pneumococci and staphylococci for which the MICs are low and could be a problem for strains such as our ciprofloxacin-resistant, methicillin-resistant S. aureus and P. aeruginosa strains which had relatively short PAE and PA-SME values. With these caveats in mind, our results support once daily dosing of garenoxacin.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant from Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Wallingford, Conn.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Bassetti, M., L. M. Dembry, P. A. Farrel, D. A. Callan, and V. T. Andriole. 2002. Antimicrobial activities of BMS-284756 compared with those of fluoroquinolones and β-lactams against gram-positive clinical isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:234-238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cars, O., and I. Odenholt-Tornqvist. 1993. The post-antibiotic sub-MIC effect in vitro and in vivo. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 31:159-166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Craig, W. 1993. Pharmacodynamics of antimicrobial agents as a basis for determining dosage regimens. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 12(Suppl. 1):6-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Craig, W. A., and S. Gudmundsson. 1996. Postantibiotic effect, p. 296-329. In V. Lorian (ed.), Antibiotics in laboratory medicine. The Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore, Md.
  • 5.Fix, A. M., M. A. Pfaller, D. J. Biedenbach, M. L. Beach, and R. N. Jones. 2001. Comparative antimicrobial spectrum of BMS284756 (T-3811, a desfluoroquinolone) tested against 656 Enterobacteriaceae, including preliminary in vitro susceptibility test comparisons and development. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 18:141-145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fung-Tomc, J., B. Minassian, B. Kolek, E. Huczko, L. Aleksunes, T. Stickle, T. Washo, E. Gradelski, L. Valera, and D. P. Bonner. 2000. Antibacterial spectrum of a novel des-fluoro(6) quinolone, BMS 284756. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:3351-3356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.MacKenzie, F. M., and I. M. Gould. 1993. The post-antibiotic effect. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 32:519-537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Murray, P. R., E. J. Baron, M. A. Pfaller, F. C. Tenover, and R. H. Yolken (ed.). 1995. Manual of clinical microbiology, 7th ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
  • 9.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2000. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically, 5th ed. Approved standard. NCCLS publication no. M7-A5. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
  • 10.Odenholt-Tornqvist, I. 1993. Studies on the postantibiotic effect and the postantibiotic sub-MIC effect of meropenem. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 31:881-892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Odenholt-Tornqvist, I., E. Löwdin, and O. Cars. 1992. Postantibiotic sub-MIC effects of vancomycin, roxithromycin, sparfloxacin, and amikacin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 36:1852-1858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pankuch, G. A., K. Nagai, T. A. Davies, M. R. Jacobs, and P. C. Appelbaum. 2002. Antipneumococcal activity of BMS 284756 compared to those of six other agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:251-254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Takahata, M., J. Mitsuyama, Y. Yamashiro, M. Yonezawa, H. Araki, Y. Todo, S. Minami, Y. Watanabe, and H. Narita. 1999. In vitro and in vivo antimicrobial activities of T-3811ME, a novel des-F-(6)-quinolone. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:1077-1084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wise, R., T. Gee, G. Marshall, and J. M. Andrews. 2002. Single-dose pharmacokinetics and penetration of BMS 284756 into an inflammatory exudate. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:242-244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES