Skip to main content
PMC home page
Annals of Surgery logoLink to Annals of Surgery
. 1988 Jul;208(1):91–94. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198807000-00013

Can clinical evaluation and noninvasive testing substitute for arteriography in the evaluation of carotid artery disease?

W S Moore 1, S Ziomek 1, W J Quiñones-Baldrich 1, H I Machleder 1, R W Busuttil 1, J D Baker 1
PMCID: PMC1493566  PMID: 3389948

Abstract

The objective of this study was to prospectively assess the value of combining clinical assessment and noninvasive testing in predicting the spectrum of carotid bifurcation pathology, as subsequently proven by arteriography, in order to determine the safety and accuracy of performing carotid endarterectomy without angiography. A panel of eight specialists representing vascular surgery, neurology, and neurosurgery were presented with the history, physical findings, and noninvasive test results (GEE-OPG and duplex scan) of 85 patients. They were asked to make an anatomic prediction of the status of each carotid artery (170 arteries) as to whether the bifurcation was normal, ulcerated, had a hemodynamically significant stenosis, or was occluded. The predictions were then prospectively evaluated and correlated with angiographic findings; 159 of 170 (93.5%) carotid arteries were accurately characterized; 73 of 80 (91%) symptomatic carotid arteries and 86 of 90 (95.5%) asymptomatic arteries were correctly characterized; 61 of 61 (100%) stenoses of hemodynamic significance, nine of 14 (64.3%) ulcerations without stenosis, and 18 of 18 (100%) of total occlusions were accurately identified by the panel. Twenty-nine patients have subsequently had 32 carotid endarterectomies without angiography, and the predicted lesion was confirmed at the time of exploration. The combination of clinical assessment and noninvasive testing, particularly duplex scanning, when performed in a laboratory with validated accuracy may with defined qualification be safely used as a substitute for contrast angiography.

Full text

PDF
91

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barnes R. W., Bone G. E., Reinertson J., Slaymaker E. E., Hokanson D. E., Strandness D. E., Jr Noninvasive ultrasonic carotid angiography: prospective validation by contrast arteriography. Surgery. 1976 Sep;80(3):328–335. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barnes R. W., Rittgers S. E., Putney W. W. Real-time Doppler spectrum analysis: predictive value in defining operable carotid artery disease. Arch Surg. 1982 Jan;117(1):52–57. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1982.01380250034008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blackshear W. M., Jr, Connar R. G. Carotid endarterectomy without angiography. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1982 Nov-Dec;23(6):477–482. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blackshear W. M., Jr, Phillips D. J., Thiele B. L., Hirsch J. H., Chikos P. M., Marinelli M. R., Ward K. J., Strandness D. E., Jr Detection of carotid occlusive disease by ultrasonic imaging and pulsed Doppler spectrum analysis. Surgery. 1979 Nov;86(5):698–706. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Blackshear W. M., Phillips D. J., Chikos P. M., Harley J. D., Thiele B. L., Strandness D. E., Jr Carotid artery velocity patterns in normal and stenotic vessels. Stroke. 1980 Jan-Feb;11(1):67–71. doi: 10.1161/01.str.11.1.67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Crew J. R., Dean M., Johnson J. M., Knighton D., Bashour T. T., Ellertson D., Hanna E. S. Carotid surgery without angiography. Am J Surg. 1984 Aug;148(2):217–220. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(84)90224-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Day A. L., Rhoton A. L., Quisling R. G. Resolving siphon stenosis following endarterectomy. Stroke. 1980 May-Jun;11(3):278–281. doi: 10.1161/01.str.11.3.278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Earnest F., 4th, Forbes G., Sandok B. A., Piepgras D. G., Faust R. J., Ilstrup D. M., Arndt L. J. Complications of cerebral angiography: prospective assessment of risk. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1984 Feb;142(2):247–253. doi: 10.2214/ajr.142.2.247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Eikelboom B. C., Ackerstaff R. G., Ludwig J. W., Moll F. L., de Vries A. R., Vermeulen F. E. Digital video subtraction angiography and duplex scanning in assessment of carotid artery disease: comparison with conventional angiography. Surgery. 1983 Nov;94(5):821–825. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Goodson S. F., Flanigan D. P., Bishara R. A., Schuler J. J., Kikta M. J., Meyer J. P. Can carotid duplex scanning supplant arteriography in patients with focal carotid territory symptoms? J Vasc Surg. 1987 Apr;5(4):551–557. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Huckman M. S., Shenk G. I., Neems R. L., Tinor T. Transfemoral cerebral arteriography versus direct precutaneous carotid and brachial arteriography: a comparison of complication rates. Radiology. 1979 Jul;132(1):93–97. doi: 10.1148/132.1.93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Johnson J. M., Kennelly M. M., Decesare D., Morgan S., Sparrow A. Natural history of asymptomatic carotid plaque. Arch Surg. 1985 Sep;120(9):1010–1012. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1985.01390330022004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kerber C. W., Cromwell L. D., Drayer B. P., Bank W. O. Cerebral ischemia. I. Current angiographic techniques, complications, and safety. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1978 Jun;130(6):1097–1103. doi: 10.2214/ajr.130.6.1097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mani R. L., Eisenberg R. L., McDonald E. J., Jr, Pollock J. A., Mani J. R. Complications of catheter cerebral arteriography: analysis of 5,000 procedures. I. Criteria and incidence. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1978 Nov;131(5):861–865. doi: 10.2214/ajr.131.5.861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. O'Donnell T. F., Jr, Erdoes L., Mackey W. C., McCullough J., Shepard A., Heggerick P., Isner J., Callow A. D. Correlation of B-mode ultrasound imaging and arteriography with pathologic findings at carotid endarterectomy. Arch Surg. 1985 Apr;120(4):443–449. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1985.01390280037009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Reilly L. M., Lusby R. J., Hughes L., Ferrell L. D., Stoney R. J., Ehrenfeld W. K. Carotid plaque histology using real-time ultrasonography. Clinical and therapeutic implications. Am J Surg. 1983 Aug;146(2):188–193. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(83)90370-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ricotta J. J., Holen J., Schenk E., Plassche W., Green R. M., Gramiak R., DeWeese J. A. Is routine angiography necessary prior to carotid endarterectomy? J Vasc Surg. 1984 Jan;1(1):96–102. doi: 10.1067/mva.1984.avs0010096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Schuler J. J., Flanigan D. P., Lim L. T., Keifer T., Williams L. R., Behrend A. J. The effect of carotid siphon stenosis on stroke rate, death, and relief of symptoms following elective carotid endarterectomy. Surgery. 1982 Dec;92(6):1058–1067. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sumner D. S., Russell J. B., Miles R. D. Are noninvasive tests sufficiently accurate to identify patients in need of carotid arteriography? Surgery. 1982 Jun;91(6):700–706. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Thomas G. I., Jones T. W., Stavney L. S., Manhas D. R., Spencer M. P. Carotid endarterectomy after Doppler ultrasonographic examination without angiography. Am J Surg. 1986 May;151(5):616–619. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(86)90570-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Walsh J., Markowitz I., Kerstein M. D. Carotid endarterectomy for amaurosis fugax without angiography. Am J Surg. 1986 Aug;152(2):172–174. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(86)90236-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Weintraub M. I., Lambert D., Rothman A. L. Carotid ultrasonography--the new "gold standard". Surgical and angiographic correlation. Angiology. 1985 Jan;36(1):19–22. doi: 10.1177/000331978503600103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins

RESOURCES