Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Annals of Surgery logoLink to Annals of Surgery
. 1988 Jul;208(1):42–49. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198807000-00006

Scintigraphic assessment of the anorectal angle in health and after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

D C Barkel 1, J H Pemberton 1, M E Pezim 1, S F Phillips 1, K A Kelly 1, M L Brown 1
PMCID: PMC1493577  PMID: 3389944

Abstract

To determine whether the anorectal angle was preserved after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, a simple, safe, low-radiation, real-time method of imaging the anorectum was developed. A cylindrical balloon was placed in the neorectum and anal canal and filled with a solution of 99mTc in water. A gamma camera then imaged the angulation of the balloon while the subject was at rest, during sphincteric squeeze, and during a Valsalva maneuver. Thirteen healthy volunteers and six patients were studied after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. An angle was identified in all controls and patients. In the lateral decubitus position at rest, the mean anorectal angle in controls (102 +/- 18 degrees; SD) and anopouch angle in patients (108 +/- 19 degrees) were similar (p = 0.3). Sitting straightened the angle in both groups (p less than 0.03), whereas sphincteric squeeze and a Valsalva maneuver sharpened the angle in both the sitting and standing positions (p less than 0.03). In the lateral decubitus position, however, the pouch group was less able to sharpen the angle than were the controls (p = 0.04). In controls, the anorectal junction descended during sitting and elevated during squeeze (p less than 0.03), but this did not occur in the pouch group. In conclusion, maneuvers favoring or stressing continence (squeeze, Valsalva) sharpened the anorectal angle and elevated the pelvic floor, whereas a maneuver favoring defecation (sitting) straightened the angle and caused the pelvic floor to descend. After ileal-anal anastomosis, the angle and its movements (except those while lying) were similar to controls. Elevation of the pelvic floor during squeeze, however, was decreased, indicating a decreased mobility of the pelvic floor after operation.

Full text

PDF
42

Images in this article

45Fig. 3.
on p.45
45Fig. 4.
on p.45
45Fig. 5.
on p.45
46Fig. 6.
on p.46

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. AGOSTONI E., RAHN H. Abdominal and thoracic pressures at different lung volumes. J Appl Physiol. 1960 Nov;15:1087–1092. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1960.15.6.1087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BENNETT R. C., DUTHIE H. L. THE FUNCTIONAL IMPORTANCE OF THE INTERNAL ANAL SPHINCTER. Br J Surg. 1964 May;51:355–357. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800510514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bartolo D. C., Roe A. M., Locke-Edmunds J. C., Virjee J., Mortensen N. J. Flap-valve theory of anorectal continence. Br J Surg. 1986 Dec;73(12):1012–1014. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800731227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Beart R. W., Jr, Dozois R. R., Wolff B. G., Pemberton J. H. Mechanisms of rectal continence. Lessons from the ileoanal procedure. Am J Surg. 1985 Jan;149(1):31–34. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(85)80005-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cohen Z., McLeod R. S., Stern H., Grant D., Nordgren S. The pelvic pouch and ileoanal anastomosis procedure. Surgical technique and initial results. Am J Surg. 1985 Nov;150(5):601–607. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(85)90445-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Frenckner B., Euler C. V. Influence of pudendal block on the function of the anal sphincters. Gut. 1975 Jun;16(6):482–489. doi: 10.1136/gut.16.6.482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. GASTON E. A. Physiological basis for preservation of fecal continence after resection of rectum. J Am Med Assoc. 1951 Aug 18;146(16):1486–1489. doi: 10.1001/jama.1951.03670160028008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Heppell J., Kelly K. A., Phillips S. F., Beart R. W., Jr, Telander R. L., Perrault J. Physiologic aspects of continence after colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and endorectal ileo-anal anastomosis. Ann Surg. 1982 Apr;195(4):435–443. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198204000-00009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Heppell J., Taylor B. M., Beart R. W., Jr, Dozois R. R., Kelly K. A. Predicting outcome after endorectal ileoanal anastomosis. Can J Surg. 1983 Mar;26(2):132–134. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kuypers J. H. Fecal incontinence and the anorectal angle. Neth J Surg. 1984 Feb;36(1):20–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lahr C. J., Rothenberger D. A., Jensen L. L., Goldberg S. M. Balloon topography. A simple method of evaluating anal function. Dis Colon Rectum. 1986 Jan;29(1):1–5. doi: 10.1007/BF02555272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Metcalf A. M., Dozois R. R., Kelly K. A., Beart R. W., Jr, Wolff B. G. Ileal "J" pouch-anal anastomosis. Clinical outcome. Ann Surg. 1985 Dec;202(6):735–739. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198512000-00013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nasmyth D. G., Johnston D., Godwin P. G., Dixon M. F., Smith A., Williams N. S. Factors influencing bowel function after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg. 1986 Jun;73(6):469–473. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800730617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nasmyth D. G., Williams N. S., Johnston D. Comparison of the function of triplicated and duplicated pelvic ileal reservoirs after mucosal proctectomy and ileo-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and adenomatous polyposis. Br J Surg. 1986 May;73(5):361–366. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800730511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Neal D. E., Williams N. S., Johnston D. Rectal, bladder and sexual function after mucosal proctectomy with and without a pelvic reservoir for colitis and polyposis. Br J Surg. 1982 Oct;69(10):599–604. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800691015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Nicholls R. J., Pezim M. E. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: a comparison of three reservoir designs. Br J Surg. 1985 Jun;72(6):470–474. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800720622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. O'Connell P. R., Pemberton J. H., Kelly K. A. Motor function of the ileal J pouch and its relation to clinical outcome after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. World J Surg. 1987 Dec;11(6):735–741. doi: 10.1007/BF01656596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. O'Connell P. R., Stryker S. J., Metcalf A. M., Pemberton J. H., Kelly K. A. Anal canal pressure and motility after ileoanal anastomosis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1988 Jan;166(1):47–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. PARKS A. G., PORTER N. H., MELZAK J. Experimental study of the reflex mechanism controlling the muscle of the pelvic floor. Dis Colon Rectum. 1962 Nov-Dec;5:407–414. doi: 10.1007/BF02616644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Parks A. G., Porter N. H., Hardcastle J. The syndrome of the descending perineum. Proc R Soc Med. 1966 Jun;59(6):477–482. doi: 10.1177/003591576605900601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Parks A. G. Royal Society of Medicine, Section of Proctology; Meeting 27 November 1974. President's Address. Anorectal incontinence. Proc R Soc Med. 1975 Nov;68(11):681–690. doi: 10.1177/003591577506801105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Peck D. A. Rectal mucosal replacement. Ann Surg. 1980 Mar;191(3):294–303. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198003000-00007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Pemberton J. H., Kelly K. A. Achieving enteric continence: principles and applications. Mayo Clin Proc. 1986 Jul;61(7):586–599. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)62009-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pemberton J. H., Kelly K. A., Beart R. W., Jr, Dozois R. R., Wolff B. G., Ilstrup D. M. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Long-term results. Ann Surg. 1987 Oct;206(4):504–513. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198710000-00011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Phillips S. F., Edwards D. A. Some aspects of anal continence and defaecation. Gut. 1965 Aug;6(4):396–406. doi: 10.1136/gut.6.4.396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Preston D. M., Lennard-Jones J. E., Thomas B. M. The balloon proctogram. Br J Surg. 1984 Jan;71(1):29–32. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800710109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Stryker S. J., Kelly K. A., Phillips S. F., Dozois R. R., Beart R. W., Jr Anal and neorectal function after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Ann Surg. 1986 Jan;203(1):55–61. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198601000-00010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Taylor B. M., Beart R. W., Jr, Phillips S. F. Longitudinal and radial variations of pressure in the human anal sphincter. Gastroenterology. 1984 Apr;86(4):693–697. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Taylor B. M., Cranley B., Kelly K. A., Phillips S. F., Beart R. W., Jr, Dozois R. R. A clinico-physiological comparison of ileal pouch-anal and straight ileoanal anastomoses. Ann Surg. 1983 Oct;198(4):462–468. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198310000-00006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins

RESOURCES