Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Annals of Surgery logoLink to Annals of Surgery
. 1989 May;209(5):562–568. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198905000-00008

Differentiating pancreatic pseudocyst and pancreatic necrosis using computerized tomography.

R Mainwaring 1, J Kern 1, W G Schenk 3rd 1, L E Rudolf 1
PMCID: PMC1494068  PMID: 2705821

Abstract

Ten per cent of patients with acute pancreatitis will develop pancreatic complications. Differentiating pancreatic pseudocyst formation from pancreatic necrosis may be difficult based on clinical grounds. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of computerized tomography in differentiating these processes. A retrospective analysis was performed of 40 patients who developed pancreatic complications following an episode of acute pancreatitis and who subsequently underwent operation for drainage of their pancreatic fluid collections. All 40 patients had abdominal CT scans performed before surgery and the patients were then categorized on the basis of CT findings as having (1) a pseudocyst with a well-defined cyst wall, (2) peripancreatic fluid marked by the absence of a cyst wall, and (3) a combination of a pseudocyst as well as free peripancreatic fluid. Patients with pseudocysts had an average hospital stay of 14 +/- 2 days, a hospital morbidity rate of 16%, and a hospital mortality rate of 0%. In contrast, patients with peripancreatic fluid collections had an average hospital stay of 43 +/- 4 days (p less than 0.01) and hospital morbidity and mortality rates of 74% (p less than 0.01) and 22% (p less than 0.05), respectively. Patients with both pseudocysts and peripancreatic fluid collections behaved in a similar fashion to patients with peripancreatic fluid alone as characterized by a prolonged hospital stay and a high incidence (80%) of postoperative complications. At one year follow-up, 89% of the patients with pseudocysts were asymptomatic, whereas only 13% (p less than 0.01) of patients with peripancreatic fluid were symptom free. These data demonstrate that pseudocyst and peripancreatic fluid collections have markedly different biologic characteristics both in their short-term and long-term behavior. The results suggest that CT scanning can differentiate these processes and may help in directing the appropriate surgical therapy.

Full text

PDF
562

Images in this article

563Fig. 1.
on p.563
564Fig. 2.
on p.564

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bank S., Wise L., Gersten M. Risk factors in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1983 Oct;78(10):637–640. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beebe D. S., Bubrick M. P., Onstad G. R., Hitchcock C. R. Management of pancreatic pseudocysts. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1984 Dec;159(6):562–564. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Beger H. G., Bittner R., Block S., Büchler M. Bacterial contamination of pancreatic necrosis. A prospective clinical study. Gastroenterology. 1986 Aug;91(2):433–438. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(86)90579-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Block S., Maier W., Bittner R., Büchler M., Malfertheiner P., Beger H. G. Identification of pancreas necrosis in severe acute pancreatitis: imaging procedures versus clinical staging. Gut. 1986 Sep;27(9):1035–1042. doi: 10.1136/gut.27.9.1035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Boggs B. R., Potts J. R., 3rd, Postier R. G. Five year experience with pancreatic pseudocysts. Am J Surg. 1982 Dec;144(6):685–688. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(82)90551-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ephgrave K., Hunt J. L. Presentation of pancreatic pseudocysts: implications for timing of surgical intervention. Am J Surg. 1986 Jun;151(6):749–753. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(86)90058-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kivisaari L., Somer K., Standertskjöld-Nordenstam C. G., Schröder T., Kivilaakso E., Lempinen M. A new method for the diagnosis of acute hemorrhagic-necrotizing pancreatitis using contrast-enhanced CT. Gastrointest Radiol. 1984;9(1):27–30. doi: 10.1007/BF01887796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Nordestgaard A. G., Wilson S. E., Williams R. A. Early computerized tomography as a predictor of outcome in acute pancreatitis. Am J Surg. 1986 Jul;152(1):127–132. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(86)90162-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ranson J. H., Balthazar E., Caccavale R., Cooper M. Computed tomography and the prediction of pancreatic abscess in acute pancreatitis. Ann Surg. 1985 May;201(5):656–665. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198505000-00016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ranson J. H., Spencer F. C. Prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of pancreatic abscess. Surgery. 1977 Jul;82(1):99–106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Reber H. A. Surgical intervention in necrotizing pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 1986 Aug;91(2):479–481. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(86)90587-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sostre C. F., Flournoy J. G., Bova J. G., Goldstein H. M., Schenker S. Pancreatic phlegmon. Clinical features and course. Dig Dis Sci. 1985 Oct;30(10):918–927. doi: 10.1007/BF01308290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Warshaw A. L., Rattner D. W. Timing of surgical drainage for pancreatic pseudocyst. Clinical and chemical criteria. Ann Surg. 1985 Dec;202(6):720–724. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198512000-00010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wertheimer M. D., Norris C. S. Surgical management of necrotizing pancreatitis. Arch Surg. 1986 Apr;121(4):484–487. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1986.01400040122020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. White E. M., Wittenberg J., Mueller P. R., Simeone J. F., Butch R. J., Warshaw A. L., Neff C. C., Nardi G. L., Ferrucci J. T., Jr Pancreatic necrosis: CT manifestations. Radiology. 1986 Feb;158(2):343–346. doi: 10.1148/radiology.158.2.3510442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins

RESOURCES