Skip to main content
PMC home page
Annals of Surgery logoLink to Annals of Surgery
. 1989 May;209(5):532–540. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198905000-00004

Preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with pancreatic pseudocyst associated with resolving acute and chronic pancreatitis.

W H Nealon 1, C M Townsend Jr 1, J C Thompson 1
PMCID: PMC1494080  PMID: 2705818

Abstract

Experience with patients with pancreatic pseudocysts has led the authors to the hypothesis that preoperative evaluation of the pancreatic and bile ducts by ERCP will define those patients who may be inadequately treated by pseudocyst drainage alone without attention to associated pancreatic and biliary ductal abnormalities. In patients with certain ductal abnormalities, the pseudocyst operation was combined with a definitive operative drainage of the pancreatic duct and/or of the biliary tree where appropriate. A prospective evaluation of routine preoperative ERCP was undertaken over a 36-month period in all patients scheduled for operative treatment of pseudocyst of the pancreas. From an initial group of 44 patients with pseudocysts, three patients who had spontaneous regression of the pseudocyst were excluded. ERCP was successful in 39 of the remaining 41 patients. Among 41 operated patients, 24 were admitted with a diagnosis of pseudocyst that arose after an episode of acute pancreatitis, and 17 had chronic pancreatitis with pseudocyst. Nine patients, initially assumed to have acute pancreatitis, were recognized to have chronic pancreatitis on the basis of ERCP findings. Communication with the main pancreatic duct (MPD) was demonstrated in 18 of 41 pseudocysts, and the rate of communication was similar in patients with acute and chronic pancreatitis. Dilatation of the MPD was seen in 23 of 41 patients and was associated with chronic pancreatitis in 21. Dilatation of the common bile duct was found in 12 patients with chronic pancreatitis. The operative plan was altered by ERCP findings in 24 of 41 patients; 22 of the 24 patients had chronic pancreatitis. There were no complications of ERCP. These data suggest that ERCP should be performed in all patients with pseudocysts to establish correct diagnosis and to allow optimal choice of operation.

Full text

PDF

Images in this article

535Fig. 1.
on p.535
535Fig. 2.
on p.535
536Fig. 3.
on p.536

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andersen B. N., Hancke S., Nielsen S. A., Schmidt A. The diagnosis of pancreatic cyst by endoscopic retrograde pancreatography and ultrasonic scanning. Ann Surg. 1977 Mar;185(3):286–289. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197703000-00006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aranha G. V., Prinz R. A., Freeark R. J., Kruss D. M., Greenlee H. B. Evaluation of therapeutic options for pancreatic pseudocysts. Arch Surg. 1982 May;117(5):717–721. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1982.01380290163029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Axon A. T., Classen M., Cotton P. B., Cremer M., Freeny P. C., Lees W. R. Pancreatography in chronic pancreatitis: international definitions. Gut. 1984 Oct;25(10):1107–1112. doi: 10.1136/gut.25.10.1107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lawson T. L. Acute pancreatitis and its complications. Computed tomography and sonography. Radiol Clin North Am. 1983 Sep;21(3):495–513. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Mullins R. J., Malangoni M. A., Bergamini T. M., Casey J. M., Richardson J. D. Controversies in the management of pancreatic pseudocysts. Am J Surg. 1988 Jan;155(1):165–172. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(88)80275-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Munn J. S., Aranha G. V., Greenlee H. B., Prinz R. A. Simultaneous treatment of chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic pseudocyst. Arch Surg. 1987 Jun;122(6):662–667. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1987.01400180044008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Prinz R. A., Aranha G. V., Greenlee H. B. Combined pancreatic duct and upper gastrointestinal and biliary tract drainage in chronic pancreatitis. Arch Surg. 1985 Mar;120(3):361–366. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1985.01390270099017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Silvis S. E., Vennes J. A., Rohrmann C. A. Endoscopic pancreatography in the evaluation of patients with suspected pancreatic pseudocysts. Am J Gastroenterol. 1974 Jun;61(6):452–459. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Stabile B. E., Calabria R., Wilson S. E., Passaro E., Jr Stricture of the common bile duct from chronic pancreatitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1987 Aug;165(2):121–126. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Sugawa C., Walt A. J. Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography in the surgery of pancreatic pseudocysts. Surgery. 1979 Oct;86(4):639–647. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Warshaw A. L., Rattner D. W. Facts and fallacies of common bile duct obstruction by pancreatic pseudocysts. Ann Surg. 1980 Jul;192(1):33–37. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198007000-00006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Warshaw A. L., Schapiro R. H., Ferrucci J. T., Jr, Galdabini J. J. Persistent obstructive jaundice, cholangitis, and biliary cirrhosis due to common bile duct stenosis in chronic pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 1976 Apr;70(4):562–567. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins

RESOURCES