Abstract
Two systems of general-practitioner obstetric care currently in use in England are compared. In one (Oxford) a large number of doctors, working with community midwives, have autonomous responsibility for the management of patients whose condition conforms with defined booking criteria. In the other (Dulwich) two practitioners, working with hospital midwives, operate a minimal selection policy, but all their patients are reviewed at 36 weeks' gestation by a specialist obstetrician. Despite the differing selection policies which created incongruities in the groups in respect of age, social class, and birthweight distribution, the outcomes in terms of mode of delivery showed no significant differences. The perinatal mortality rates were also similar and appeared to be better than those achieved nationally.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bull M. J. Ten years' experience in a general practice obstetric unit. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1980 Apr;30(213):208–215. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chalmers I. The search for indices. Lancet. 1979 Nov 17;2(8151):1063–1065. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(79)92455-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marsh G. N. Obstetric audit in general practice. Br Med J. 1977 Oct 15;2(6093):1004–1006. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6093.1004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oldershaw K. L., Brudenell J. M. Use by general practitioners of obstetric beds in a consultant unit: a further report. Br Med J. 1975 Jan 18;1(5950):139–142. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5950.139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oldershaw K. L., Brudenell J. M. Use by general practitioners of obstetric beds in a consultant unit: report of first 500 cases. Br Med J. 1968 Jul 13;3(5610):112–116. doi: 10.1136/bmj.3.5610.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]