Skip to main content
Journal of General Internal Medicine logoLink to Journal of General Internal Medicine
. 1999 Mar;14(3):193–195. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.00313.x

Willingness to Pay for Diagnostic Certainty

Comparing Patients, Physicians, and Managed Care Executives

Richard A Hirth 1, Bernard S Bloom 2, Michael E Chernew 1, A Mark Fendrick 1
PMCID: PMC1496554  PMID: 10203627

Abstract

Cost-effectiveness analyses routinely ignore the value of diagnostic certainty. Moreover, no previous study has compared this value among different stakeholders. We surveyed 25 patients, 28 physicians, and 23 managed care executives to compare their willingness to pay for diagnostic information for peptic ulcer disease. Patients (84%) were most likely, and executives (43%) least likely, to be willing to pay at least $1 (median willingness to pay < $50). Differences in willingness to pay among stakeholders indicate potential for conflicts over access to tests. Although nearly all patients valued diagnostic certainty, its value was generally small and insufficient to change the cost-effectiveness ranking of treatment alternatives.

Keywords: cost-effectiveness, diagnostic certainty, dyspepsia, peptic ulcer disease


Articles from Journal of General Internal Medicine are provided here courtesy of Society of General Internal Medicine

RESOURCES