Skip to main content
British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.) logoLink to British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.)
. 1982 Apr 17;284(6323):1148–1151. doi: 10.1136/bmj.284.6323.1148

Blood pressure and heart rate in patients with ischaemic heart disease receiving nifedipine and propranolol.

L Harris, H J Dargie, P G Lynch, C J Bulpitt, D M Krikler
PMCID: PMC1496779  PMID: 6803871

Abstract

A randomised controlled crossover trial was performed to assess the anti-anginal effects of nifedipine and propranolol separately and together. The effects of these treatments on blood pressure and heart rate were assessed at rest and after the cold pressor and mental arithmetic tests. Nifedipine and propranolol together produced the greatest reduction in supine and erect systolic and diastolic blood pressures. Propranolol (480 mg daily) lowered resting systolic/diastolic blood pressures by 7/6 mm Hg and nifedipine (60 mg daily) lowered it by 10/8 mm Hg, while in the erect position the hypotensive effect of these agents averaged 9/8 mm Hg. During the cold pressor test propranolol lowered the maximum pressure by an average of 11/6 mm Hg and nifedipine by 19/10 mm Hg. For the mental arithmetic test, the results were 7/2 mm Hg and 16/7 mm Hg respectively. Propranolol (480 mg daily)reduced supine and erect heart rate by 19 and 25 beats/minute respectively, while nifedipine did not alter heart rate significantly. The favourable haemodynamic responses to nifedipine suggest that it may be of value in the management of hypertension.

Full text

PDF
1148

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bristow J. D., Honour A. J., Pickering G. W., Sleight P., Smyth H. S. Diminished baroreflex sensitivity in high blood pressure. Circulation. 1969 Jan;39(1):48–54. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.39.1.48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Eckberg D. L., Drabinsky M., Braunwald E. Defective cardiac parasympathetic control in patients with heart disease. N Engl J Med. 1971 Oct 14;285(16):877–883. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197110142851602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fleckenstein A. Specific pharmacology of calcium in myocardium, cardiac pacemakers, and vascular smooth muscle. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1977;17:149–166. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pa.17.040177.001053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Guazzi M., Olivari M. T., Polese A., Fiorentini C., Magrini F., Moruzzi P. Nifedipine, a new antihypertensive with rapid action. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1977 Nov;22(5 Pt 1):528–532. doi: 10.1002/cpt1977225part1528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kannel W. B. Role of blood pressure in cardiovascular disease: the Framingham Study. Angiology. 1975 Jan;26(1 Pt 1):1–14. doi: 10.1177/000331977502600101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kawai C., Konishi T., Matsuyama E., Okazaki H. Comparative effects of three calcium antagonists, diltiazem, verapamil and nifedipine, on the sinoatrial and atrioventricular nodes. Experimental and clinical studies. Circulation. 1981 May;63(5):1035–1042. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.63.5.1035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lynch P., Dargie H., Krikler S., Krikler D. Objective assessment of antianginal treatment: a double-blind comparison of propranolol, nifedipine, and their combination. Br Med J. 1980 Jul 19;281(6234):184–187. doi: 10.1136/bmj.281.6234.184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. PRICHARD B. N., GILLAM P. M. USE OF PROPRANOLOL (INDERAL) IN TREATMENT OF HYPERTENSION. Br Med J. 1964 Sep 19;2(5411):725–727. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5411.725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rowland E., Evans T., Krikler D. Effect of nifedipine on atrioventricular conduction as compared with verapamil. Intracardiac electrophysiological study. Br Heart J. 1979 Aug;42(2):124–127. doi: 10.1136/hrt.42.2.124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wei J. W., Janis R. A., Daniel E. E. Alterations in calcium transport and binding by the plasma membrane of mesenteric arteries from spontaneously hypertensive rats. Blood Vessels. 1977;14(1):55–64. doi: 10.1159/000158114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Medical Journal (Clinical research ed.) are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES