Skip to main content
British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.) logoLink to British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.)
. 1982 Apr 17;284(6323):1176–1177. doi: 10.1136/bmj.284.6323.1176

Are follow-up consultations at medical outpatient departments futile?

G N Marsh
PMCID: PMC1496833  PMID: 6803889

Abstract

Of 260 follow-up medical outpatient consultations analysed by 12 general practitioners in the Northern Region, a large proportion appeared to be a complete waste of time. One follow-up consultation should be the normal for the great majority of cases and if more are necessary specific reasons should be given. Great economies could be made in the National Health Service by reducing medical outpatient follow-ups.

Full text

PDF

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Hallpike J. F. New treatments for multiple sclerosis. Br J Hosp Med. 1980 Jan;23(1):63-4, 66, 68. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Lloyd D. C., Cooper S. J., Wall B. F. Letter: Radiation exposure during cardiac catheterisation. Lancet. 1976 Apr 17;1(7964):854–855. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(76)90501-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Loudon I. S. A question of numbers. Lancet. 1976 Apr 3;1(7962):736–737. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(76)93104-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lovell C. R., Burton J. L., Horrobin D. F. Treatment of atopic eczema with evening primrose oil. Lancet. 1981 Jan 31;1(8214):278–278. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(81)92119-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Shaw C. D. The problems of out-patient visits. Health Trends. 1981 Nov;13(4):107–108. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Medical Journal (Clinical research ed.) are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES