Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Public Health Reports logoLink to Public Health Reports
. 2003 Nov-Dec;118(6):531–539. doi: 10.1093/phr/118.6.531

Alternative HIV testing methods among populations at high risk for HIV infection.

Dawn R Greensides 1, Ruth Berkelman 1, Amy Lansky 1, Patrick S Sullivan 1
PMCID: PMC1497600  PMID: 14563910

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the levels of awareness and use of alternative HIV tests (home collection kit, oral mucosal transudate collection kit, and rapid tests) among people at high risk for HIV infection. METHODS: Data were collected as part of an anonymous, cross-sectional interview study--the HIV Testing Survey (HITS)--conducted in seven states from September 2000 to February 2001. Three high-risk populations were recruited: men who have sex with men, injection drug users, and high-risk heterosexuals. Respondents were asked about their awareness and use of alternative HIV tests. RESULTS: The overall awareness and use of the alternative tests was limited: 54% of respondents were aware of the home collection kit, 42% were aware of the oral mucosal transudate collection kit test, and 13% were aware of rapid tests. Among those aware of alternative tests, self-reported use of the tests was also low. The most common reasons given for not using alternative HIV tests were: preference for the standard test; concern that the results could be less accurate; and that alternative tests were not offered. CONCLUSIONS: The low levels of awareness and use of alternative HIV tests suggest that the potential for promoting testing among individuals at high risk for HIV by encouraging use of alternative HIV tests has not been fully realized. Alternative tests should be made more broadly available and should be accompanied by education about these tests for physicians and people at risk. Educational efforts should be evaluated to determine if promoting alternative HIV tests increases the numbers of people at risk for HIV who are tested.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (86.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Colfax G. N., Lehman J. S., Bindman A. B., Vittinghoff E., Vranizan K., Fleming P. L., Chesney M., Osmond D., Hecht F. M., Multisite Evaluation of Surveillance of HIV (MESH) Study Group What happened to home HIV test collection kits? Intent to use kits, actual use, and barriers to use among persons at risk for HIV infection. AIDS Care. 2002 Oct;14(5):675–682. doi: 10.1080/0954012021000005533a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Frank A. P., Wandell M. G., Headings M. D., Conant M. A., Woody G. E., Michel C. Anonymous HIV testing using home collection and telemedicine counseling. A multicenter evaluation. Arch Intern Med. 1997 Feb 10;157(3):309–314. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gallo D., George J. R., Fitchen J. H., Goldstein A. S., Hindahl M. S. Evaluation of a system using oral mucosal transudate for HIV-1 antibody screening and confirmatory testing. OraSure HIV Clinical Trials Group. JAMA. 1997 Jan 15;277(3):254–258. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hecht F. M., Chesney M. A., Lehman J. S., Osmond D., Vranizan K., Colman S., Keane D., Reingold A., Bindman A. B. Does HIV reporting by name deter testing? MESH Study Group. AIDS. 2000 Aug 18;14(12):1801–1808. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200008180-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Janssen R. S., Holtgrave D. R., Valdiserri R. O., Shepherd M., Gayle H. D., De Cock K. M. The Serostatus Approach to Fighting the HIV Epidemic: prevention strategies for infected individuals. Am J Public Health. 2001 Jul;91(7):1019–1024. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.7.1019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kassler W. J., Dillon B. A., Haley C., Jones W. K., Goldman A. On-site, rapid HIV testing with same-day results and counseling. AIDS. 1997 Jul;11(8):1045–1051. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199708000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kassler W. J., Haley C., Jones W. K., Gerber A. R., Kennedy E. J., George J. R. Performance of a rapid, on-site human immunodeficiency virus antibody assay in a public health setting. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Nov;33(11):2899–2902. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.11.2899-2902.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Malone J. D., Smith E. S., Sheffield J., Bigelow D., Hyams K. C., Beardsley S. G., Lewis R. S., Roberts C. R. Comparative evaluation of six rapid serological tests for HIV-1 antibody. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 1993 Feb;6(2):115–119. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Peralta L., Constantine N., Griffin Deeds B., Martin L., Ghalib K. Evaluation of youth preferences for rapid and innovative human immunodeficiency virus antibody tests. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001 Jul;155(7):838–843. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.155.7.838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pugatch D. L., Levesque B. G., Lally M. A., Reinert S. E., Filippone W. J., Combs C. M., Flanigan T. P., Brown L. K. HIV testing among young adults and older adolescents in the setting of acute substance abuse treatment. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2001 Jun 1;27(2):135–142. doi: 10.1097/00126334-200106010-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Spielberg F., Critchlow C., Vittinghoff E., Coletti A. S., Sheppard H., Mayer K. H., Metzgerg D., Judson F. N., Buchbinder S., Chesney M. Home collection for frequent HIV testing: acceptability of oral fluids, dried blood spots and telephone results. HIV Early Detection Study Group. AIDS. 2000 Aug 18;14(12):1819–1828. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200008180-00018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sy F. S., Rhodes S. D., Choi S. T., Drociuk D., Laurent A. A., Naccash R. M., Kettinger L. D. The acceptability of oral fluid testing for HIV antibodies. A pilot study in gay bars in a predominantly rural state. Sex Transm Dis. 1998 Apr;25(4):211–215. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199804000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Public Health Reports are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES