Skip to main content
Public Health Reports logoLink to Public Health Reports
. 2004 Nov-Dec;119(6):577–584. doi: 10.1016/j.phr.2004.09.007

Evaluating the performance of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention core Health-Related Quality of Life scale with adolescents.

Keith J Zullig 1, Robert F Valois 1, E Scott Huebner 1, J Wanzer Drane 1
PMCID: PMC1497669  PMID: 15504449

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's core Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) scale using data from 5,520 public high school students. METHODS: The 1997 South Carolina Youth Risk Behavior Survey was the source of data. Chi-square analysis was applied to assess scale construct validity. Adjusted multiple logistic regression with selected tobacco and substance use variables was used to assess known-groups validity of the scale's Healthy Days index (items regarding poor physical and mental health days during the past 30 days). RESULTS: Construct validity was supported for the core HRQOL scale by the associations between self-perceived health and physical health, mental health, and activity limitation days. A greater number of poor physical health days, poor mental health days, or activity limitation days was associated with poorer self-perceived health (p<0.0001); however, correlation coefficients for the associations between self-perceived health and physical health days (r=0.24; p<0.001), self-perceived health and mental health days (r=0.26; p<0.0001), and self-perceived health and activity limitation days (r=0.23; p<0.0001), although significant, were low in magnitude. Logistic regression analyses conducted with the Healthy Days index revealed significant (p<0.05) HRQOL differences between users and non- users of tobacco and other substance use variables. As hypothesized, as the usage of each substance increased, reported poor HRQOL days increased, supporting the known- groups validity of the scale. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides preliminary evidence that the HRQOL scale items are valid and potentially useful for adolescent surveillance. The results, however, are mixed regarding the inclusion of self-perceived health as a measure of HRQOL for adolescents, given the low correlation coefficients for the associations between self-perceived health and the other HRQOL scale items. These results suggest that adolescents may be rating two separate dimensions of health when rating their self-perceived health and HRQOL. Further research is needed to confirm these findings in different adolescent populations.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (105.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andresen E. M., Catlin T. K., Wyrwich K. W., Jackson-Thompson J. Retest reliability of surveillance questions on health related quality of life. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 May;57(5):339–343. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.5.339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andresen E. M., Fouts B. S., Romeis J. C., Brownson C. A. Performance of health-related quality-of-life instruments in a spinal cord injured population. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 Aug;80(8):877–884. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90077-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bradley C. Importance of differentiating health status from quality of life. Lancet. 2001 Jan 6;357(9249):7–8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03562-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brener N. D., Collins J. L., Kann L., Warren C. W., Williams B. I. Reliability of the Youth Risk Behavior Survey Questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Mar 15;141(6):575–580. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hennessy C. H., Moriarty D. G., Zack M. M., Scherr P. A., Brackbill R. Measuring health-related quality of life for public health surveillance. Public Health Rep. 1994 Sep-Oct;109(5):665–672. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Idler E. L., Benyamini Y. Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. J Health Soc Behav. 1997 Mar;38(1):21–37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Idler E. L., Kasl S. V., Lemke J. H. Self-evaluated health and mortality among the elderly in New Haven, Connecticut, and Iowa and Washington counties, Iowa, 1982-1986. Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Jan;131(1):91–103. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Irwin Charles E., Jr, Burg Scott J., Uhler Cart Courtney. America's adolescents: where have we been, where are we going? J Adolesc Health. 2002 Dec;31(6 Suppl):91–121. doi: 10.1016/s1054-139x(02)00489-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mossey J. M., Shapiro E. Self-rated health: a predictor of mortality among the elderly. Am J Public Health. 1982 Aug;72(8):800–808. doi: 10.2105/ajph.72.8.800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Raat H., Landgraf J. M., Bonsel G. J., Gemke R. J. B. J., Essink-Bot M. L. Reliability and validity of the child health questionnaire-child form (CHQ-CF87) in a Dutch adolescent population. Qual Life Res. 2002 Sep;11(6):575–581. doi: 10.1023/a:1016393311799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Scales P. C. Reducing risks and building developmental assets: essential actions for promoting adolescent health. J Sch Health. 1999 Mar;69(3):113–119. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.1999.tb07219.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Segovia J., Bartlett R. F., Edwards A. C. The association between self-assessed health status and individual health practices. Can J Public Health. 1989 Jan-Feb;80(1):32–37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Smith K. W., Avis N. E., Assmann S. F. Distinguishing between quality of life and health status in quality of life research: a meta-analysis. Qual Life Res. 1999 Aug;8(5):447–459. doi: 10.1023/a:1008928518577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Valois R. F., Zullig K. J., Huebner E. S., Drane J. W. Relationship between life satisfaction and violent behaviors among adolescents. Am J Health Behav. 2001 Jul-Aug;25(4):353–366. doi: 10.5993/ajhb.25.4.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Vingilis E., Wade T. J., Adlaf E. What factors predict student self-rated physical health? J Adolesc. 1998 Feb;21(1):83–97. doi: 10.1006/jado.1997.0131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Vingilis Evelyn R., Wade Terrance J., Seeley Jane S. Predictors of adolescent self-rated health. Analysis of the National Population Health Survey. Can J Public Health. 2002 May-Jun;93(3):193–197. doi: 10.1007/BF03404999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wade T. J., Pevalin D. J., Vingilis E. Revisiting student self-rated physical health. J Adolesc. 2000 Dec;23(6):785–791. doi: 10.1006/jado.2000.0359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Public Health Reports are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES