Skip to main content
Public Health Reports logoLink to Public Health Reports
. 2005 Jul-Aug;120(4):409–417. doi: 10.1177/003335490512000408

Trends in maternal and infant health in poor urban neighborhoods: good news from the 1990s, but challenges remain.

Embry M Howell 1, Kathryn L S Pettit 1, G Thomas Kingsley 1
PMCID: PMC1497744  PMID: 16025721

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: During the 1990s, numerous public policy changes occurred that may have affected the health of mothers and infants in low-income neighborhoods. This article examines trends in key maternal and child health indicators to determine whether disparities between high-poverty neighborhoods and other neighborhoods have declined. METHODS: Using neighborhood-level vital statistics and U.S. Census data, we categorized "neighborhoods" (Census tracts) as being high poverty (greater than 30% of population below the federal poverty level in 1990) or not. We compared trends in four key indicators--births to teenagers, late prenatal care, low birth-weight; and infant mortality--over the 1990s among high-poverty and other neighborhoods in Cuyahoga County, Ohio; Denver, Colorado; Marion County, Indiana; and Oakland, California. RESULTS: In all four metropolitan areas, trends in high-poverty neighborhoods were more favorable than in other neighborhoods. The most consistently positive trend was the reduction in the rate of teen births. The metropolitan areas with the most intensive programs to improve maternal and child health--Cuyahoga County and Oakland-saw the most consistent improvement across all indicators. Still, great disparities between high-poverty and other neighborhoods remain, and only Oakland shows promise of achieving some of the Healthy People 2010 maternal and child health goals in its high-poverty neighborhoods. CONCLUSIONS: While there has been a reduction in maternal and infant health disparities between high-poverty and other neighborhoods, much work remains to eliminate disparities and achieve the 2010 goals. Small area data are useful in isolating the neighborhoods that should be targeted. Experience from the 1990s suggests that a combination of several intensive interventions can be effective at reducing disparities.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (263.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Diez Roux A. V., Merkin S. S., Arnett D., Chambless L., Massing M., Nieto F. J., Sorlie P., Szklo M., Tyroler H. A., Watson R. L. Neighborhood of residence and incidence of coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. 2001 Jul 12;345(2):99–106. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200107123450205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Geronimus A. T., Bound J., Waidmann T. A., Hillemeier M. M., Burns P. B. Excess mortality among blacks and whites in the United States. N Engl J Med. 1996 Nov 21;335(21):1552–1558. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199611213352102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gold M., Sparer M., Chu K. Medicaid managed care: lessons from five states. Health Aff (Millwood) 1996 Fall;15(3):153–166. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.15.3.153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hays L. B. From the Health Care Financing Administration. JAMA. 1990 Jan 26;263(4):496–496. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Howell E. M. The impact of the Medicaid expansions for pregnant women: a synthesis of the evidence. Med Care Res Rev. 2001 Mar;58(1):3–30. doi: 10.1177/107755870105800101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Howell Embry M., Dubay Lisa, Kenney Genevieve, Sommers Anna S. The impact of Medicaid managed care on pregnant women in Ohio: a cohort analysis. Health Serv Res. 2004 Aug;39(4 Pt 1):825–846. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00260.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Howell Embry M., Richardson Douglas, Ginsburg Paul, Foot Barbara. Deregionalization of neonatal intensive care in urban areas. Am J Public Health. 2002 Jan;92(1):119–124. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.1.119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Johnson J. H. U.S. differentials in infant mortality: why do they persist? Fam Plann Perspect. 1987 Sep-Oct;19(5):227–232. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kleinman J. C., Kiely J. L. Infant mortality. Healthy People 2000 Stat Notes. 1991 Winter;1(2):1–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Krieger Nancy, Waterman Pamela D., Chen Jarvis T., Soobader Mah-Jabeen, Subramanian S. V. Monitoring socioeconomic inequalities in sexually transmitted infections, tuberculosis, and violence: geocoding and choice of area-based socioeconomic measures--the public health disparities geocoding project (US). Public Health Rep. 2003 May-Jun;118(3):240–260. doi: 10.1093/phr/118.3.240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lockwood Charles J. Predicting premature delivery--no easy task. N Engl J Med. 2002 Jan 24;346(4):282–284. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200201243460412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mosher William D., Deang Lionel P., Bramlett Matthew D. Community environment and women's health outcomes: contextual data. Vital Health Stat 23. 2003 Apr;(23):1–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. O'Campo P., Xue X., Wang M. C., Caughy M. Neighborhood risk factors for low birthweight in Baltimore: a multilevel analysis. Am J Public Health. 1997 Jul;87(7):1113–1118. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.7.1113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pearl M., Braveman P., Abrams B. The relationship of neighborhood socioeconomic characteristics to birthweight among 5 ethnic groups in California. Am J Public Health. 2001 Nov;91(11):1808–1814. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.11.1808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Perloff J. D., Jaffee K. D. Late entry into prenatal care: the neighborhood context. Soc Work. 1999 Mar;44(2):116–128. doi: 10.1093/sw/44.2.116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Stagner M. W., Duran M. A. Comprehensive community initiatives: principles, practice, and lessons learned. Future Child. 1997 Summer-Fall;7(2):132–140. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ventura S. J., Mathews T. J., Curtin S. C. Declines in teenage birth rates, 1991-98: update of national and state trends. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 1999 Oct 25;47(26):1–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Zuckerman Stephen, Brennan Niall, Yemane Alshadye. Has Medicaid managed care affected beneficiary access and use? Inquiry. 2002 Fall;39(3):221–242. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_39.3.221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Public Health Reports are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES