Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Public Health Reports logoLink to Public Health Reports
. 2005 Sep-Oct;120(5):532–542. doi: 10.1177/003335490512000508

A review of instruments assessing public health preparedness.

Steven M Asch 1, Michael Stoto 1, Marc Mendes 1, R Burciaga Valdez 1, Meghan E Gallagher 1, Paul Halverson 1, Nicole Lurie 1
PMCID: PMC1497752  PMID: 16224986

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to review instruments that assess the level of preparedness of state and local public health departments to respond to health threats such as bioterrorism. METHODS: The authors examined 27 published population-based instruments for planning or evaluating preparedness that were mostly unavailable in the peer-reviewed literature. Using the Essential Public Health Services framework, the instruments were evaluated for (1) clarity of measurement parameters, (2) balance between structural and process measures, (3) evidence of effectiveness, and (4) specification of an accountable entity. RESULTS: There was a great deal of overlap but little consistency in what constitutes "preparedness" or how it should be measured. Most instruments relied excessively on subjective or structural measures, lacked scientific evidence for measures assessed, and failed to clearly define what entity was accountable for accomplishing the task or function. CONCLUSION: Strategies for improvement include measure standardization, better interagency communication, and investment in public health practice research to develop the underlying evidence base required for developing quality measures and assessments.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (106.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baker E. L., Melton R. J., Stange P. V., Fields M. L., Koplan J. P., Guerra F. A., Satcher D. Health reform and the health of the public. Forging community health partnerships. JAMA. 1994 Oct 26;272(16):1276–1282. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Black N. Evidence based policy: proceed with care. BMJ. 2001 Aug 4;323(7307):275–279. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7307.275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Briss P. A., Zaza S., Pappaioanou M., Fielding J., Wright-De Agüero L., Truman B. I., Hopkins D. P., Mullen P. D., Thompson R. S., Woolf S. H. Developing an evidence-based Guide to Community Preventive Services--methods. The Task Force on Community Preventive Services. Am J Prev Med. 2000 Jan;18(1 Suppl):35–43. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00119-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Buehler James W. Review of the 2003 National Syndromic Surveillance Conference--lessons learned and questions to be answered. MMWR Suppl. 2004 Sep 24;53:18–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Derose Stephen F., Asch Steven M., Fielding Jonathan E., Schuster Mark A. Developing quality indicators for local health departments: experience in Los Angeles County. Am J Prev Med. 2003 Nov;25(4):347–357. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(03)00208-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Derose Stephen F., Schuster Mark A., Fielding Jonathan E., Asch Steven M. Public health quality measurement: concepts and challenges. Annu Rev Public Health. 2001 Oct 25;23:1–21. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.23.092601.095644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Donabedian A. The quality of medical care. Science. 1978 May 26;200(4344):856–864. doi: 10.1126/science.417400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Halpern J. The measurement of quality of care in the Veterans Health Administration. Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3 Suppl):MS55–MS68. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199603001-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Handler A., Issel M., Turnock B. A conceptual framework to measure performance of the public health system. Am J Public Health. 2001 Aug;91(8):1235–1239. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.8.1235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Irvin Charlene Babcock, Nouhan Patricia Petrella, Rice Kimberly. Syndromic analysis of computerized emergency department patients' chief complaints: an opportunity for bioterrorism and influenza surveillance. Ann Emerg Med. 2003 Apr;41(4):447–452. doi: 10.1067/mem.2003.104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jencks S. F., Cuerdon T., Burwen D. R., Fleming B., Houck P. M., Kussmaul A. E., Nilasena D. S., Ordin D. L., Arday D. R. Quality of medical care delivered to Medicare beneficiaries: A profile at state and national levels. JAMA. 2000 Oct 4;284(13):1670–1676. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.13.1670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kania C., Richards R., Sanderson-Austin J., Wagner J., Wetzler H. Using clinical and functional data for quality improvement in outcomes measurement consortia. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1996 Jul;22(7):492–504. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30251-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kindig David, Stoddart Greg. What is population health? Am J Public Health. 2003 Mar;93(3):380–383. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.3.380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. McGlynn E. A., Asch S. M. Developing a clinical performance measure. Am J Prev Med. 1998 Apr;14(3 Suppl):14–21. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(97)00032-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Public Health Reports are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES