Skip to main content
PMC home page
British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.) logoLink to British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.)
. 1982 May 22;284(6328):1539–1542. doi: 10.1136/bmj.284.6328.1539

A new method of auditing surgical mortality rates: application to a group of elderly general surgical patients.

D G Seymour, R Pringle
PMCID: PMC1498470  PMID: 6805597

Abstract

In a prospective study of 505 patients aged 65 years or over admitted to a general surgical unit the overall hospital mortality rate was 14.5% and the postoperative mortality rate 12.0%. These rates fell to 3.6% and 5.8% respectively when deaths in non-viable patients were excluded from the analysis. An audit of surgical outcome that fails to identify non-viable patients is therefore potentially misleading. A standardised system of reporting surgical mortality is proposed to aid the comparison of results from different units. The key elements of this system are (a) the separation of the results from non-viable and potentially viable patients; (b) the consideration of both operative and non-operative mortality; (c) the differentiation between medical and surgical causes of postoperative mortality; and (d) the identification of patients who are discharged from the unit but who have residual malignancy. Data presented in such a way should be of direct relevance to surgeons and physicians who are seeking ways of improving the service provided for surgical patients of all ages.

Full text

PDF
1539

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andersen B., Genster H., Langberg K. Geriatric surgery in a community. A statistical analysis of 7.292 aged patients admitted to the surgical departments in a Danish County in the 10-year period 1952-1961. Acta Chir Scand Suppl. 1965;354:1–103. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BONUS R. L., DORSEY J. M. MAJOR SURGERY IN THE AGED PATIENT. A CONTINUATION STUDY. Arch Surg. 1965 Jan;90:95–96. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1965.01320070097021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blake R., Lynn J. Emergency abdominal surgery in the aged. Br J Surg. 1976 Dec;63(12):956–960. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800631217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cogbill C. L. Operation in the aged. Mortality related to concurrent disease, duration of anesthesia, and elective or emergency operation. Arch Surg. 1967 Feb;94(2):202–205. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1967.01330080040013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Collopy B. T. A surgical outcome audit. Med J Aust. 1979 Dec 29;2(13):689–691. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1979.tb104280.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fielding L. P., Stewart-Brown S., Blesovsky L. Large-bowel obstruction caused by cancer: a prospective study. Br Med J. 1979 Sep 1;2(6189):515–517. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6189.515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gilmore O. J., Griffiths N. J., Connolly J. C., Dunlop A. W., Hart S., Thomson J. P., Todd I. P. Surgical audit: Comparison of the work load and results of two hospitals in the same district. Br Med J. 1980 Oct 18;281(6247):1050–1052. doi: 10.1136/bmj.281.6247.1050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Goldacre M. J., Harris R. I. Mortality, morbidity, resource allocation, and planning: a consideration of disease classification. Br Med J. 1980 Dec 6;281(6254):1515–1519. doi: 10.1136/bmj.281.6254.1515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gough M. H., Kettlewell M. G., Marks C. G., Holmes S. J., Holderness J. Audit: an annual assessment of the work and performance of a surgical firm in a regional teaching hospital. Br Med J. 1980 Oct 4;281(6245):913–918. doi: 10.1136/bmj.281.6245.913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Griffiths J. M. Surgical policy in the over-seventies (surgery in the over-seventies). Gerontol Clin (Basel) 1972;14(5):282–296. doi: 10.1159/000245404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Irving M., Temple J. Surgical audit: one year's experience in a teaching hospital. Br Med J. 1976 Sep 25;2(6038):746–747. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6038.746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. KLUG T. J., McPHERSON R. C. Postoperative complications in the elderly surgical patient. Am J Surg. 1959 Jun;97(6):713–717. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(59)90335-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Matheson N. A., Valerio D. Large-bowel surgery, 1979: self-assessment. Br Med J. 1980 Sep 13;281(6242):719–721. doi: 10.1136/bmj.281.6242.719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. McColl I. Medical audit in British hospital practice. Br J Hosp Med. 1979 Nov;22(5):485-6, 488-9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Palmberg S., Hirsjärvi E. Mortality in geriatric surgery. With special reference to the type of surgery, anaesthesia, complicating dieeases, and prophylaxis of thrombosis. Gerontology. 1979;25(2):103–112. doi: 10.1159/000212327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Salem R., Devitt P., Johnson J., Firmin R. Emergency geriatric surgical admissions. Br Med J. 1978 Aug 5;2(6134):416–417. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6134.416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Shaw C. D. Aspects of audit. 1. The background. Br Med J. 1980 May 24;280(6226):1256–1258. doi: 10.1136/bmj.280.6226.1256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Shaw C. D. Aspects of audit. 2. Audit in British hospitals. Br Med J. 1980 May 31;280(6227):1314–1316. doi: 10.1136/bmj.280.6227.1314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Shaw C. D. Aspects of audit. 5: Looking forward to audit. Br Med J. 1980 Jun 21;280(6230):1509–1511. doi: 10.1136/bmj.280.6230.1509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Medical Journal (Clinical research ed.) are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES