Abstract
We argue that the intrinsic glassy degrees of freedom in amorphous solids giving rise to the thermal conductivity plateau and the “boson peak” in the heat capacity at moderately low temperatures are directly connected to those motions giving rise to the two-level-like excitations seen at still lower temperatures. These degrees of freedom can be thought of as strongly anharmonic transitions between the local minima of the glassy energy landscape that are accompanied by ripplon-like domain wall motions of the glassy mosaic structure predicted to occur at Tg by the random first-order transition theory. The energy spectrum of the vibrations of the mosaic depends on the glass transition temperature, the Debye frequency, and the molecular length scale. The resulting spectrum reproduces the experimental low-temperature boson peak. The “nonuniversality” of the thermal conductivity plateau depends on kBTg/ℏωD and arises from calculable interactions with the phonons.
A multitude of phenomena are observed in all low-temperature glasses that can only be explained by the existence of excitations not present in crystals. At very low temperatures, the universal scalings of heat capacity and thermal conductivity suggest these excitations cannot be simply ascribed to the local molecular motions specific to each substance (1–3). Yet quantitative analysis of the experiments has generally relied on purely phenomenological models that invoke unrelated types of excitations in different temperature regimes. At liquid helium temperatures, the excitations of glasses are well described as two-level systems (TLS; refs. 4–6), but at somewhat higher temperatures, the more mysterious “boson peak” appears in the heat capacity, and the phonon mean-free path falls precipitously, as if new scatterers became active, leading to a plateau in the thermal conductivity. Several different ideas about these additional excitations have been explored, ranging from harmonic excitations of a disordered lattice (7) to anharmonic local modes of a “soft potential” with distributed parameters (8).
In contrast, here we suggest, by using simple arguments, that like the TLS (9), most of the quantum excitations in glasses in this temperature regime are intrinsic and essential relics of the nonequilibrium character of the glass after it is prepared. We show that quantized “domain wall motions” connected with the mosaic structure of glasses predicted by the random first-order transition theory of glasses (10, 11) can explain the boson peak and conductivity plateau.
The random first-order transition theory of the glass transition suggests there is a dynamical mosaic structure in classical supercooled liquids (10–12). This mosaic structure is directly manifested in the dynamical heterogeneity observed in supercooled liquids using single-molecule experiments (13) and nonlinear relaxation experiments (14). Below Tg, the mosaic is spatially defined by the molecular motions that were not arrested at Tg and is thus only dynamically detectable. We have shown that these same motions at liquid helium temperatures would be quantized and can be described by the two-state system phenomenology (9). This identification predicts the density of states arising from these motions and accounts for the previously unexplained universality of thermal conductivity in the liquid helium temperature regime. As the temperature is raised, however, the theory indicates these excitations should lose their strict two-level character. The predicted temperature of the crossover to multilevel behavior coincides with the temperature regime where further excitable modes have been needed to explain experiments. In this paper, we show explicitly how the number of extra excitable modes of the mosaic accounts nearly quantitatively for the data, thus removing the need to invoke additional mechanisms, although other contributions may well be present to some extent (see, for example, ref. 15 on the contribution of purely harmonic modes to the heat capacity of simulated a-SiO2 at this temperature). The excitations in the boson peak, like the TLS, active at lower temperatures, turn out to be collective motions of many particles (≈200) encompassing rearrangements of a typical domain frozen in at the glass transition. The multilevel behavior of these domains can be pictured as involving the concomitant excitation of the “ripplon” modes of the glassy mosaic along with the transition between local minimum energy configurations of a mosaic cell. The knowledge of the spatial extent of the domain walls, along with their mass and surface tension (9), allows us to estimate approximately the ripplon spectrum with no adjustable parameters.
The TLS Regime
According to the random first-order transition theory of supercooled liquids (10, 11), metastable configurations begin to last locally longer than a few vibrations just below a dynamical transition temperature TA. Below this transition, a glass-forming liquid samples exponentially many metastable configurations much higher in energy than those of the corresponding crystal, but which are long lived. Glassy dynamics is described by the activated motions between minima. The liquid can be visualized as a mosaic of domains that locally resemble low-free-energy configurations that are separated from each other by frustrated higher energy interfaces, or domain walls. The length scale of the mosaic and number density of these walls is determined by the competition between the energy cost of a wall and the entropic advantage of using the large number of configurations. As temperature is lowered, the configurational entropy per particle, sc, decreases so that the cooperative length grows. This leads to a larger activation barrier that eventually gives relaxation times exceeding the laboratory time scale. The size and rate of motion of these mosaic domains can be calculated without adjustable parameters once the liquid's heat capacity jump at the glass transition is known (12). In the classical regime, this theory leads to predictions of the average barrier and distributions of barriers in quantitative agreement with experiment (16). According to this microscopic calculation, at the Tg that corresponds with 1 hour relaxation time, the size of the cooperative region ξ in terms of the molecular length scale a is expected to vary only a little from substance to substance. A mosaic cell allows for at least one alternative kinetically accessible configuration at Tg. These alternate states, therefore, have spectral density ≈1/Tg per domain of size ξ3 (9). This value agrees with the measured density of TLS (6). Although they are activated at Tg, at temperatures below Tg, motions between these alternative states remain possible, switching to coherent resonant tunneling at a temperature proportional to but smaller than the Debye temperature: ∼(a/ξ)TD/2π (9).
The Boson Peak Regime of the Heat Capacity
At low temperatures, the TLS excitations involve tunneling of the mosaic cells typically containing N* ≃ 200 atoms. The tunneling path involves stagewise motion of the wall separating the distinct alternative configurations through the cell until a near-resonant state is found. In this paper, we focus on the excitations at energies just above those typical of the TLS regime. At the corresponding temperatures, other final tunneling states are possible, because the exact number and identity of the atoms that tunnel can vary (see Fig. 1a). These new configurations typically will be like the near-resonant level but will also move a few atoms at the boundary, i.e., at the interface to another domain. These fluctuations of the domain boundary shape can be visualized as domain wall surface modes (ripplons). They cost a surface energy that varies with the size of the domain and have kinetic energy consistent with the mass of the moving domain wall. It is not surprising that the ripplon's frequencies turn out to be proportional to ωD, the basic quantum energy scale in the system, just as the crossover temperature does. A detailed calculation of the ripplon spectrum would require a considerable knowledge of the topology and statistics of the mosaic. At each temperature below TA, the domain wall foam is an equilibrium structure made up of nearly flat patches. According to the random first-order transition theory, the effective surface tension depends on the curvature and vanishes at large radius of curvature as σ(r) ∝ r−1/2. To approximate the spectrum, we notice that the ripples of wave-length larger than the size of a patch will typically sense a roughly spherical surface of radius R = ξ(3/4π)1/3. The surface tension of the mosaic has been calculated from the classical microscopic theory and is given by σ(R) = ¾(kBTg/a2) log((a/dL)2/πe)(a/R)1/2 (12), where dL/a is the universal Lindemann ratio of the vibrational amplitude at the glass transition to the molecular length scale. By itself, such a tension would collapse the mosaic, but this tension should be compensated for by stretching the frozen-in outside walls of neighboring mosaic cells. This compensating effect can be approximated by an isotropic positive pressure of a ghost (i.e., vanishing density) gas on the inside. Calculating the frequencies of the surface eigen-modes of a hollow sphere, subject to surface tension, is a classic problem of mathematical physics (18). Accounting for the unusual r dependence of the surface tension σ(r) ∝ r−1/2 modifies the standard result for the frequencies by a factor of 9/8. The eigen modes have frequencies ω = (σ/m̃WR2)(l − 1)(l + 2), where m̃W = (dL/a)2ρa is the domain wall mass per unit area (9) and ρ is the mass density of the glass. The l-th mode of a sphere is (2l + 1)-fold degenerate. By using kBTg ≃ ρca3(dL/a)2 (9), one then finds ωl ≃ 1.34ωD(a/ξ)5/4 ≃ 0.15ωD . Because of the universality of the (a/ξ) ratio (12), ωl is a multiple of the Debye frequency. Because of the material's discreteness, there are no harmonics of higher than 9th to 10th order, corresponding to an atomic scale half-wavelength. The lowest allowed ripplon mode is l = 2, and it has a frequency of ∼1 THz for silica. This value is in agreement with the boson peak in the inelastic neutron scattering data (19). l = 1 corresponds to a domain translation and is accounted for by the underlying phonon momentum nonconserving tunneling transition itself. The l = 0 is a uniform domain dilation relevant to aging below Tg. The existence of the domain wall vibrations lets us visualize the multilevel character of the tunneling centers as exhibited at temperatures above the TLS regime. A schematic of the resultant droplet quantized energy levels is shown in Fig. 1b.
The (classical) density of energy minima of a domain is
(9), where the energy zero corresponds to the (high-energy) configuration frozen-in at Tg. The negative ɛ's correspond to some of the very numerous but mostly unavailable lower lying energy states that are accessed by tunneling. With the lower state of the resonant pair taken as the local ground state, the TLS spectral density becomes
The partition function of a domain with an excitation energy ɛ, possibly accompanied by populating vibrational states on top, is given by Zɛ = 1 + e−βɛ Πl Z, where Zl ≡ 1/(1 − e−βℏωl) is the partition function of an l-th order ripplon mode. Apart from the excitation ɛ, we assume here that each ripplon has a nearly harmonic spectrum. Note that our energy level scheme automatically insures that the atomic motions near the thermally inactive defects will only contribute to the regular lattice vibrations. The specific heat per domain, calculated from Zɛ and averaged over n(ɛ), is shown in Fig. 2.
The Thermal Conductivity Plateau
To estimate the scattering by the domain tunneling accompanied by the ripplons and thus the heat conductivity, we need to know the effective scattering density of states, the transition amplitudes, and the coupling to the phonons. Any transition in the domain accompanied by a change in its internal state is coupled to the gradient of the elastic field with energy g ∼ ρc ∫ ds⋅d(r), where d(r) is the molecular displacement at the droplet edge because of the transition (9). Therefore, any transitions between groups marked with solid lines in Fig. 1b are coupled to the phonons with the same strength as the underlying (TLS-like) transition, shown to be g ≃ (9), and no selection rules apply for the change in the ripplon quantum numbers because of the strong anharmonicity. We do not possess detailed information on the transition amplitudes; however, they should be on the order of the transition frequencies themselves, just as for those TLSs that are primarily responsible for the phonon absorption at the lower T whose transition amplitudes are also comparable to the total energy splitting.
Because all transitions couple equally to the phonons, we can now calculate the density of the scattering states. The phonon-absorbing transition may occur from the ground state. The corresponding total number of ways to absorb a phonon of energy ℏω is ρ(ω) = ∫ dɛ n(ɛ)Σ{nlm} δ(ℏω − [ɛ + Σlmnlmℏωlm]) = 1/kBTgΣ{nlm} θ(ω − Σlmnlmωlm)e−βgℏ(ω−Σlmnlmωlm), where we sum over all occupation numbers of the ripplons with quantum numbers l, m (m = −l… l). The transition also may occur from the higher energy conformational state (thus ɛ < 0 in Fig. 1b), and we have to compute ρ(ω) from these states too. To find ρ(ω), we compute the cumulative density of states NE(ω) ≡ ∫ dɛ n(ɛ)Σ{nlm} δ(ℏω − [Σlmnlmℏωlm − ɛ]). In a calculation parallel to obtaining Zl, this quantity can be evaluated by using an integral representation of the step function θ along with the use of steepest descent. The scattering from excited states is proportional to ρexc(ω, T) ≡ ∫ dE f(E, T)∂NE(ω)/∂E, where f(E, T) ≡ 2/(eβɛ + 1) gives the appropriate Boltzmann weights.
Accurate calculation of the heat conductivity requires solving a kinetic equation for the phonons coupled with the multilevel systems, which would account for saturation effects, etc. Instead, we use a single relaxation time approximation for each phonon frequency. The Fermi golden rule yields for the scattering rate of a phonon with ℏω ∼ kBT the relation
The heat conductivity then equals κ = ⅓Σω lmfp(ω)Cωcs, where Cω is the phonon heat capacity. At these energies, when the phonons are still relatively well defined (lmfp/λ > 1), the heat has been shown to be carried primarily by phonons (21). The phonon mean free path will rapidly drop by the high T end of the plateau and will reach its minimum allowed value, which is the phonon's wave-length λ itself (the Ioffe–Riegel condition), as known empirically from ref. 3. To see how the conductivity depends on the temperature in this region, and thus account for multiple scattering/localization effects, we use the rough approximation lmfp = csτω + λ. At high T, the heat is not carried by “ballistic” phonons, but rather is transferred by a random walk from site to site, as originally anticipated by Einstein (22, 23) for homogeneous isotropic solids.
Damping Interaction with Phonons
The coupling of the multilevel excitations to phonons leads to significant frequency shifts and damping of the resonant transitions. To compute these coupling effects, we replace the discrete summation over the different uncoupled harmonics Σl ∫ dω δ(ω − ωl) by integration over “Lorentzian” profiles
where γω is a (frequency-dependent) friction coefficient, and ωl(ω) is the renormalized ripplon frequency, which has been shifted because of the corresponding dispersion effects. The total relaxation rate of a transition involving more than one mode is thus the sum of the inverse lifetimes of the participating modes. This assumption would be entirely correct for a frequency-independent γ, but should still be an adequate approximation at the low T end of the plateau, where the absorption is mostly caused by single ripplon mode processes. The mode decay rate γω is the phonon irradiation-induced drag equal in the lowest order of perturbation to
where we do not distinguish between the longitudinal and transverse phonons. The corresponding (frequency-dependent) ripplon frequency shift required by the Kramers–Kronig relation gives a renormalized frequency
where the principal value integral (numerically ∼1) is a slow (but sign-changing) function of ω and the cut-off frequency ωc. ωc is of the order (but greater than) (a/ξ)ωD, because the phonons with wave-length shorter than ξ cause an increasingly smaller effective gradient of the phonon field as sensed by a region of size ξ. Although our approximation for γω and ωl(ω) should break down in detail for ω > ωc, it makes little difference computationally, as the damping is already very intense at this point. Both the frequency shift and the damping broaden the absorption peak, the former being quantitatively more important. Although the peaks' positions are determined by the quantum energy scale ωD, the spectral shifts are proportional to Tg. The nonuniversality of the kBTg/ℏωD ratio, which varies over the range of 2–5, thus yields a nonuniversal position of the plateau. This result is consistent with the experimentally observed material dependence in this regime. In Fig. 3, we show the resultant heat conductivities for different values of the ratio kBTg/ℏωD, using the specific cutoff ωc = 1.8(a/ξ)ωD. The nonmonotonic behavior exhibited by this approximation in the plateau region is likely an artifact of neglecting thermal saturation in the kinetic theory. Assuming that heat transport is dominated by thermal phonons alone leads to a temperature-independent lmfp(ω) and a strictly horizontal plateau.
The coupling effects on the heat capacity can be obtained by replacing each Zl with the formula for a damped oscillator. The resulting bump in c/T3, shown in Fig. 2, is therefore also nonuniversal, depending on kBTg/ℏωD being smaller for organic glasses, as seen in experiment.
We have concentrated here on the thermal phenomena ascribed to the boson peak in the glassy state itself at low temperature. Excitations of a similar frequency scale occur also above Tg and have been probed by various spectroscopies (e.g., see refs. 19 and 25). Although heavily damped, the existence of these excitations, analogous to those we discuss, on the basis of the random first-order transition theory is expected so long as the system is below TA. These degrees of freedom doubtless coexist with other, more harmonic excitations at these frequencies. Separating their contributions to experiment requires detailed consideration of the coupling of the molecular motions to electromagnetic radiation or neutrons.
Conclusion
We have explained the microscopic origin of the excess of density of states in amorphous solids leading to the so-called boson peak in the heat capacity and a plateau in thermal conductivity. The dependence of the magnitude of those phenomena on the material constants, primarily Tg and ωD, is given and is subject to experimental tests.
Acknowledgments
We thank Jörg Schmalian for reading and commenting on our manuscript. This work was supported by National Science Foundation Grant CHE-9530680.
Abbreviation
- TLS
two-level systems
References
- 1.Yu C C, Leggett A J. Comments Cond Mat Phys. 1988;14:231–251. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Leggett A J. Physica B. 1991;169:322–327. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Freeman J J, Anderson A C. Phys Rev B Solid State. 1986;34:5684–5690. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.34.5684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Anderson P W, Halperin B I, Varma C M. Philos Mag. 1972;25:1–9. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Phillips W A. J Low Temp Phys. 1972;7:351–360. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Phillips W A, editor. Amorphous Solids: Low-Temperature Properties. Berlin: Springer; 1981. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Grigera T S, Martín-Mayor V, Parisi G, Verrocchio P. Phys Rev Lett. 2001;87:085502. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.085502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Galperin Y M, Karpov V G, Kozub V I. Adv Phys. 1991;38:669–737. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lubchenko V, Wolynes P G. Phys Rev Lett. 2001;87:195901. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.195901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wolynes P G. Acc Chem Res. 1992;25:513–519. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kirkpatrick T R, Thirumalai D. Transp Theor Stat Phys. 1995;24:927–945. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Xia X, Wolynes P G. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:2990–2994. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.7.2990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Russell E V, Israeloff N E. Nature. 2000;408:695–698. doi: 10.1038/35047037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sillescu H J. NonCryst Solids. 1999;243:81–108. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Horbach J, Kob W, Binder K. J Phys Chem. 1999;103:4104–4108. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Xia X, Wolynes P G. Phys Rev Lett. 2001;86:5526–5529. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.5526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Anderson A C. In: Amorphous Solids: Low-Temperature Properties. Phillips W A, editor. Berlin: Springer; 1981. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Morse P M, Feshbach H. Methods of Theoretical Physics. Vol. 2. New York: McGraw–Hill; 1953. p. 1469. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wischnewski A, Buchenau U, Dianoux A J, Kamitakahara W A, Zarestky J L. Phys Rev B Solid State. 1998;57:2663–2666. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pohl R O. In: Amorphous Solids: Low-Temperature Properties. Phillips W A, editor. Berlin: Springer; 1981. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zaitlin M P, Anderson A C. Phys Rev B Solid State. 1975;12:4475–4492. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Einstein A. Ann Phys. 1911;35:679–694. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cahill D G, Watson S K, Pohl R O. Phys Rev B Solid State. 1992;46:6131–6140. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.46.6131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Smith T L. Ph.D. thesis. Urbana–Champaign: Univ. of Illinois; 1974. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sette F, Krisch M H, Masciovecchio C, Ruocco G, Monaco G. Nature. 1998;280:1550–1555. [Google Scholar]