Skip to main content
British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.) logoLink to British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.)
. 1982 Aug 28;285(6342):600–603. doi: 10.1136/bmj.285.6342.600

Relationship between cigarette yields, puffing patterns, and smoke intake: evidence for tar compensation?

S R Sutton, M A Russell, R Iyer, C Feyerabend, Y Saloojee
PMCID: PMC1499443  PMID: 6819031

Abstract

The relationship between cigarette yields (of nicotine, tar, and carbon monoxide), puffing patterns, and smoke intake was studied by determining puffing patterns and measuring blood concentrations of nicotine and carboxy-haemoglobin (COHb) in a sample of 55 smokers smoking their usual brand of cigarette. Regression analyses showed that the total volume of smoke puffed from a cigarette was a more important determinant of peak blood nicotine concentration than the nicotine or tar yield of the cigarette, its length, or the reported number of cigarettes smoked on the test day. There was evidence of compensation for a lower tar yield over and above any compensation for nicotine. When nicotine yield was controlled for, smokers of lower-tar cigarettes not only puffed more smoke from their cigarettes than smokers of higher-tar cigarettes but they also had higher plasma nicotine concentrations, suggesting that they were compensating for the reduced delivery of tar by puffing and inhaling a greater volume of smoke. The results based on the COHb concentrations were consistent with this interpretation. If an adequate intake of tar proves to be one of the main motives for smoking, then developing a cigarette that is acceptable to smokers and also less harmful to their health will be much more difficult.

Full text

PDF
600

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Creighton D. E., Noble M. J., Whewell R. T. A portable smoking pattern recorder. Biotelem Patient Monit. 1979;6(4):186–191. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Feyerabend C., Russell M. A. Improved gas chromatographic method and micro-extraction technique for the measurement of nicotine in biological fluids. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1979 Feb;31(2):73–76. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1979.tb13435.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Goldfarb T., Gritz E. R., Jarvik M. E., Stolerman I. P. Reactions to cigarettes as a function of nicotine and "tar". Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1976 Jun;19(6):767–772. doi: 10.1002/cpt1976196767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Russell M. A., Cole P. V., Brown E. Absorption by non-smokers of carbon monoxide from room air polluted by tobacco smoke. Lancet. 1973 Mar 17;1(7803):576–579. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(73)90718-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Russell M. A., Jarvis M., Iyer R., Feyerabend C. Relation of nicotine yield of cigarettes to blood nicotine concentrations in smokers. Br Med J. 1980 Apr 5;280(6219):972–976. doi: 10.1136/bmj.280.6219.972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wald N. J., Idle M., Boreham J., Bailey A. Inhaling habits among smokers of different types of cigarette. Thorax. 1980 Dec;35(12):925–928. doi: 10.1136/thx.35.12.925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Medical Journal (Clinical research ed.) are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES