Abstract
Inversion injuries of the ankle are a common cause of referral and presentation to accident units. They impose a load on radiographic services. A prospective trial was carried out to determine the accuracy of clinical examination. All patients were assessed clinically then examined radiographically, the clinical assessment missed 5% of the fractures. These, however, were all minor avulsion fractures or crush fractures and Tubigrip support was sufficient. Clinical examinations is, therefore, accurate and the need for most x-ray examination is questionable. X-ray examination should be reserved for patients with continuing pain or those who clinically have a fracture requiring immobilisation. This would produce a large saving in NHS resources.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- GARFIELD J. S. Is radiological examination of the twisted ankle necessary? Lancet. 1960 Nov 26;2(7161):1167–1169. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(60)92356-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Golberg B. Department of inappropriate investigations. Br Med J. 1977 Nov 12;2(6097):1274–1275. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6097.1274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- de Lacey G., Bradbrooke S. Rationalising requests for x-ray examination of acute ankle injuries. Br Med J. 1979 Jun 16;1(6178):1597–1598. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6178.1597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]