Abstract
The new perinatal death certificate proposed by the World Health Organisation was examined in relation to existing measures for recording perinatal death statistics and also with regard to new information gathered. Present procedures appear to underestimate the number of perinatal deaths by roughly 10%, though late registrations may lower this figure slightly. The use of a minimum birth weight as the criterion for inclusion in perinatal statistics removed much of the uncertainty associated with definitions of live birth and stillbirth. The new certificate led to duplication of some information already recorded through birth notification yet failed to provide information on some other factors generally considered relevant to perinatal mortality. The format proposed for recording cause of death provided a more logical presentation of events. Standardizing birth information recorded on all infants, modifying death certificates, and developing efficient record-linkage schemes would be more valuable than introducing the WHO certificate. Useful interpretation of the meaning of the characteristics of infants dying in the perinatal period awaits these timely changes.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Alberman E. Perinatal mortality rates. Br J Hosp Med. 1978 Oct;20(4):439-40, 442-3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scott M. J., McClure G., Reid M. M., Ritchie J. N., Keilty S. R. Neonatal death in Northern Ireland. Br Med J. 1978 Oct 7;2(6143):987–989. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6143.987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Southgate D. A., Durnin J. V. Calorie conversion factors. An experimental reassessment of the factors used in the calculation of the energy value of human diets. Br J Nutr. 1970 Jun;24(2):517–535. doi: 10.1079/bjn19700050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]