Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the relation of screening mammography to breast cancer incidence and case fatality. METHODS: In a sample of White female Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized in 1990-1991, age-adjusted breast cancer incidence and 2-year case fatality rates were estimated and compared with the frequency of mammographic screening from a population-based survey. RESULTS: The average rates for incidence, case fatality, and mammography within 5 years in 29 states were 414/100,000, 18.8%, and 59.2%, respectively. There was a positive state-level correlation between mammography rates and incidence and an inverse correlation between mammography and case fatality. CONCLUSIONS: High screening mammography rates in some states are associated with reduced breast cancer case fatality rates, presumably as a result of diagnosis of earlier stage cancers.
Full text
PDFSelected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Andersson I., Aspegren K., Janzon L., Landberg T., Lindholm K., Linell F., Ljungberg O., Ranstam J., Sigfússon B. Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmö mammographic screening trial. BMJ. 1988 Oct 15;297(6654):943–948. doi: 10.1136/bmj.297.6654.943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baranovsky A., Myers M. H. Cancer incidence and survival in patients 65 years of age and older. CA Cancer J Clin. 1986 Jan-Feb;36(1):26–41. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.36.1.26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Calle E. E., Flanders W. D., Thun M. J., Martin L. M. Demographic predictors of mammography and Pap smear screening in US women. Am J Public Health. 1993 Jan;83(1):53–60. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.1.53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eley J. W., Hill H. A., Chen V. W., Austin D. F., Wesley M. N., Muss H. B., Greenberg R. S., Coates R. J., Correa P., Redmond C. K. Racial differences in survival from breast cancer. Results of the National Cancer Institute Black/White Cancer Survival Study. JAMA. 1994 Sep 28;272(12):947–954. doi: 10.1001/jama.272.12.947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fisher E. S., Whaley F. S., Krushat W. M., Malenka D. J., Fleming C., Baron J. A., Hsia D. C. The accuracy of Medicare's hospital claims data: progress has been made, but problems remain. Am J Public Health. 1992 Feb;82(2):243–248. doi: 10.2105/ajph.82.2.243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harper A. P. Mammography utilization in the poor and medically underserved. Cancer. 1993 Aug 15;72(4 Suppl):1478–1482. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19930815)72:4+<1478::aid-cncr2820721411>3.0.co;2-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hayward R. A., Shapiro M. F., Freeman H. E., Corey C. R. Who gets screened for cervical and breast cancer? Results from a new national survey. Arch Intern Med. 1988 May;148(5):1177–1181. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Katz S. J., Hofer T. P. Socioeconomic disparities in preventive care persist despite universal coverage. Breast and cervical cancer screening in Ontario and the United States. JAMA. 1994 Aug 17;272(7):530–534. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kerlikowske K., Grady D., Rubin S. M., Sandrock C., Ernster V. L. Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis. JAMA. 1995 Jan 11;273(2):149–154. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koopman J. S., Longini I. M., Jr The ecological effects of individual exposures and nonlinear disease dynamics in populations. Am J Public Health. 1994 May;84(5):836–842. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.5.836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marwick C. NCI changes its stance on mammography. JAMA. 1994 Jan 12;271(2):96–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McBean A. M., Warren J. L., Babish J. D. Measuring the incidence of cancer in elderly Americans using Medicare claims data. Cancer. 1994 May 1;73(9):2417–2425. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19940501)73:9<2417::aid-cncr2820730927>3.0.co;2-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller A. B., Baines C. J., To T., Wall C. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years. CMAJ. 1992 Nov 15;147(10):1477–1488. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nyström L., Rutqvist L. E., Wall S., Lindgren A., Lindqvist M., Rydén S., Andersson I., Bjurstam N., Fagerberg G., Frisell J. Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomised trials. Lancet. 1993 Apr 17;341(8851):973–978. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91067-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parker S. L., Tong T., Bolden S., Wingo P. A. Cancer statistics, 1996. CA Cancer J Clin. 1996 Jan-Feb;46(1):5–27. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.46.1.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Poole C. Ecologic analysis as outlook and method. Am J Public Health. 1994 May;84(5):715–716. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.5.715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rimer B. K., Keintz M. K., Kessler H. B., Engstrom P. F., Rosan J. R. Why women resist screening mammography: patient-related barriers. Radiology. 1989 Jul;172(1):243–246. doi: 10.1148/radiology.172.1.2740510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schwartz S. The fallacy of the ecological fallacy: the potential misuse of a concept and the consequences. Am J Public Health. 1994 May;84(5):819–824. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.5.819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Susser M. The logic in ecological: I. The logic of analysis. Am J Public Health. 1994 May;84(5):825–829. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.5.825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Susser M. The logic in ecological: II. The logic of design. Am J Public Health. 1994 May;84(5):830–835. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.5.830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tabàr L., Fagerberg G., Duffy S. W., Day N. E., Gad A., Gröntoft O. Update of the Swedish two-county program of mammographic screening for breast cancer. Radiol Clin North Am. 1992 Jan;30(1):187–210. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zapka J. G., Stoddard A. M., Costanza M. E., Greene H. L. Breast cancer screening by mammography: utilization and associated factors. Am J Public Health. 1989 Nov;79(11):1499–1502. doi: 10.2105/ajph.79.11.1499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]