Skip to main content
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1998 Jul;88(7):1047–1051. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.7.1047

Occupational skin diseases in Washington State, 1989 through 1993: using workers' compensation data to identify cutaneous hazards.

J D Kaufman 1, M A Cohen 1, S R Sama 1, J W Shields 1, J Kalat 1
PMCID: PMC1508281  PMID: 9663152

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to characterize occupational dermatoses and cutaneous hazards. METHODS: Workers' compensation claims filed for skin disease in the Washington State Fund were analyzed for 1989 through 1993; incidence rates for industries and employers were calculated, and cutaneous hazards associated with the highest rates were identified. RESULTS: A total of 7445 claims were filed for skin disorders, principally contact dermatitis; 675 (9.1%) involved more than 3 missed work-days. The rate of accepted skin disorder claims was 1.0 per 1000 full-time employee-years. The highest incidence rates (4.6 to 30.7 accepted claims per 1000 full-time employee-years) were in certain manufacturing industries (plastics related, concrete products, aircraft parts, sporting goods, and boat building), wholesale farm product raw materials, automotive glass replacement, and beauty shops. Seven of the 10 employers with the highest incidence rates (19.6 to 85.5 accepted claims per 1000 full-time employee-years) used fiber-reinforced plastics (composites) and exposed workers to epoxy and other resin systems associated with contact dermatitis. CONCLUSIONS: Workers' compensation data identify known and emerging workplace cutaneous hazards and show promise for targeting prevention efforts.

Full text

PDF
1047

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Avnstorp C. Prevalence of cement eczema in Denmark before and since addition of ferrous sulfate to Danish cement. Acta Derm Venereol. 1989;69(2):151–155. doi: 10.2340/0001555569151155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker E. L., Melius J. M., Millar J. D. Surveillance of occupational illness and injury in the United States: current perspectives and future directions. J Public Health Policy. 1988 Summer;9(2):198–221. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Behrens V., Seligman P., Cameron L., Mathias C. G., Fine L. The prevalence of back pain, hand discomfort, and dermatitis in the US working population. Am J Public Health. 1994 Nov;84(11):1780–1785. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.11.1780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Holmes N., Pearce P., Simpson G. Prevention of epoxy resin dermatitis: failure of manufacturers to use available research information. Am J Ind Med. 1993 Nov;24(5):605–617. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700240510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Holness D. L., Nethercott J. R. Dermatitis in hairdressers. Dermatol Clin. 1990 Jan;8(1):119–126. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Holness D. L., Nethercott J. R. Work outcome in workers with occupational skin disease. Am J Ind Med. 1995 Jun;27(6):807–815. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700270605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jolanki R., Kanerva L., Estlander T., Tarvainen K., Keskinen H., Henriks-Eckerman M. L. Occupational dermatoses from epoxy resin compounds. Contact Dermatitis. 1990 Sep;23(3):172–183. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1990.tb04779.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kanerva L., Jolanki R., Toikkanen J. Frequencies of occupational allergic diseases and gender differences in Finland. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1994;66(2):111–116. doi: 10.1007/BF00383366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Keil J. E., Shmunes E. The epidemiology of work-related skin disease in South Carolina. Arch Dermatol. 1983 Aug;119(8):650–654. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Leow Y. H., Ng S. K., Wong W. K., Goh C. L. Allergic contact dermatitis from epoxy resin in Singapore. Contact Dermatitis. 1995 Nov;33(5):355–356. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1995.tb02059.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mathias C. G., Sinks T. H., Seligman P. J., Halperin W. E. Surveillance of occupational skin diseases: a method utilizing workers' compensation claims. Am J Ind Med. 1990;17(3):363–370. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700170309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Meding B., Swanbeck G. Consequences of having hand eczema. Contact Dermatitis. 1990 Jul;23(1):6–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1990.tb00076.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Newmark F. M. Hops allergy and terpene sensitivity: an occupational disease. Ann Allergy. 1978 Nov;41(5):311–312. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. O'Malley M., Thun M., Morrison J., Mathias C. G., Halperin W. E. Surveillance of occupational skin disease using the Supplementary Data System. Am J Ind Med. 1988;13(2):291–299. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700130210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Tosti A., Guerra L., Vincenzi C., Peluso A. M. Occupational skin hazards from synthetic plastics. Toxicol Ind Health. 1993 May-Jun;9(3):493–502. doi: 10.1177/074823379300900308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES