Skip to main content
NCBI home page
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1998 Aug;88(8):1161–1167. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.8.1161

Final results of the Maryland WIC 5-A-Day Promotion Program.

S Havas 1, J Anliker 1, D Damron 1, P Langenberg 1, M Ballesteros 1, R Feldman 1
PMCID: PMC1508288  PMID: 9702141

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This National Cancer Institute-funded study sought to increase fruit and vegetable consumption among women served by the WIC program in Maryland. METHODS: Over a 2-year period, a multifaceted intervention program using a randomized crossover design sought to increase fruit and vegetable consumption at 16 WIC program sites in Baltimore City and 6 Maryland counties. Participants were surveyed at baseline, 2 months postintervention, and 1 year later. RESULTS: Two months postintervention, mean daily consumption had increased by 0.56 +/- 0.11 servings in intervention participants and 0.13 +/- 0.07 servings in control participants (P = .002). Intervention participants also showed greater changes in stages of change, knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy. Changes in consumption were closely related to number of nutrition sessions attended, baseline stage of change, race, and education. One year later, mean consumption had increased by an additional 0.27 servings in both intervention and control participants. CONCLUSIONS: Dietary changes to prevent cancer can be achieved and sustained in this hard-to-reach, low-income population. However, many obstacles must be overcome to achieve such changes.

Full text

PDF
1161

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abrams B. Preventing low birth weight: does WIC work? A review of evaluations of the special supplemental food program for women, infants, and children. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993 Mar 15;678:306–316. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26133.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Armstrong B., Doll R. Environmental factors and cancer incidence and mortality in different countries, with special reference to dietary practices. Int J Cancer. 1975 Apr 15;15(4):617–631. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910150411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Block G., Patterson B., Subar A. Fruit, vegetables, and cancer prevention: a review of the epidemiological evidence. Nutr Cancer. 1992;18(1):1–29. doi: 10.1080/01635589209514201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Doll R., Peto R. The causes of cancer: quantitative estimates of avoidable risks of cancer in the United States today. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1981 Jun;66(6):1191–1308. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Donner A., Birkett N., Buck C. Randomization by cluster. Sample size requirements and analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 1981 Dec;114(6):906–914. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Endres J., Dunning S., Poon S. W., Welch P., Duncan H. Older pregnant women and adolescents: nutrition data after enrollment in WIC. J Am Diet Assoc. 1987 Aug;87(8):1011-6, 1019. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Foerster S. B., Kizer K. W., Disogra L. K., Bal D. G., Krieg B. F., Bunch K. L. California's "5 a day--for better health!" campaign: an innovative population-based effort to effect large-scale dietary change. Am J Prev Med. 1995 Mar-Apr;11(2):124–131. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Greenwald P., Lanza E., Eddy G. A. Dietary fiber in the reduction of colon cancer risk. J Am Diet Assoc. 1987 Sep;87(9):1178–1188. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hammad T. A., Havas S., Damron D., Langenberg P. Withdrawal rates for infants and children participating in WIC in Maryland. J Am Diet Assoc. 1997 Aug;97(8):893–895. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(97)00219-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Havas S., Heimendinger J., Damron D., Nicklas T. A., Cowan A., Beresford S. A., Sorensen G., Buller D., Bishop D., Baranowski T. 5 A Day for better health--nine community research projects to increase fruit and vegetable consumption. Public Health Rep. 1995 Jan-Feb;110(1):68–79. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Heimendinger J. Community nutrition intervention strategies for cancer risk reduction. Cancer. 1993 Aug 1;72(3 Suppl):1019–1023. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19930801)72:3+<1019::aid-cncr2820721313>3.0.co;2-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jobe J. B., Mingay D. J. Cognitive research improves questionnaires. Am J Public Health. 1989 Aug;79(8):1053–1055. doi: 10.2105/ajph.79.8.1053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kennedy E. T., Gershoff S., Reed R., Austin J. E. Evaluation of the effect of WIC supplemental feeding on birth weight. J Am Diet Assoc. 1982 Mar;80(3):220–227. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kotelchuck M., Schwartz J. B., Anderka M. T., Finison K. S. WIC participation and pregnancy outcomes: Massachusetts Statewide Evaluation Project. Am J Public Health. 1984 Oct;74(10):1086–1092. doi: 10.2105/ajph.74.10.1086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Metcoff J., Costiloe P., Crosby W. M., Dutta S., Sandstead H. H., Milne D., Bodwell C. E., Majors S. H. Effect of food supplementation (WIC) during pregnancy on birth weight. Am J Clin Nutr. 1985 May;41(5):933–947. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/41.5.933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Miller A. B. Diet and cancer. A review. Acta Oncol. 1990;29(1):87–95. doi: 10.3109/02841869009089996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rush D., Alvir J. M., Kenny D. A., Johnson S. S., Horvitz D. G. The National WIC Evaluation: evaluation of the Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants, and Children. III. Historical study of pregnancy outcomes. Am J Clin Nutr. 1988 Aug;48(2 Suppl):412–428. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/48.2.412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rush D., Leighton J., Sloan N. L., Alvir J. M., Garbowski G. C. The National WIC Evaluation: evaluation of the Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants, and Children. II. Review of past studies of WIC. Am J Clin Nutr. 1988 Aug;48(2 Suppl):394–411. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/48.2.394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rush D., Leighton J., Sloan N. L., Alvir J. M., Horvitz D. G., Seaver W. B., Garbowski G. C., Johnson S. S., Kulka R. A., Devore J. W. The National WIC Evaluation: evaluation of the Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants, and Children. VI. Study of infants and children. Am J Clin Nutr. 1988 Aug;48(2 Suppl):484–511. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/48.2.484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rush D., Sloan N. L., Leighton J., Alvir J. M., Horvitz D. G., Seaver W. B., Garbowski G. C., Johnson S. S., Kulka R. A., Holt M. The National WIC Evaluation: evaluation of the Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants, and Children. V. Longitudinal study of pregnant women. Am J Clin Nutr. 1988 Aug;48(2 Suppl):439–483. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/48.2.439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Schramm W. F. WIC prenatal participation and its relationship to newborn Medicaid costs in Missouri: a cost/benefit analysis. Am J Public Health. 1985 Aug;75(8):851–857. doi: 10.2105/ajph.75.8.851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Steinmetz K. A., Potter J. D. Vegetables, fruit, and cancer. I. Epidemiology. Cancer Causes Control. 1991 Sep;2(5):325–357. doi: 10.1007/BF00051672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Stockbauer J. W. WIC prenatal participation and its relation to pregnancy outcomes in Missouri: a second look. Am J Public Health. 1987 Jul;77(7):813–818. doi: 10.2105/ajph.77.7.813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Subar A. F., Heimendinger J., Patterson B. H., Krebs-Smith S. M., Pivonka E., Kessler R. Fruit and vegetable intake in the United States: the baseline survey of the Five A Day for Better Health Program. Am J Health Promot. 1995 May-Jun;9(5):352–360. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-9.5.352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES