Skip to main content
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1999 Feb;89(2):182–187. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.2.182

The impact of condom availability [correction of distribution] in Seattle schools on sexual behavior and condom use.

D Kirby 1, N D Brener 1, N L Brown 1, N Peterfreund 1, P Hillard 1, R Harrist 1
PMCID: PMC1508534  PMID: 9949746

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Ten Seattle high schools made condoms available through vending machines, baskets in school clinics, or both. This study measured the number of condoms that students obtained and subsequent changes in sexual behavior and condom use. METHODS: Schoolwide surveys were administered in spring 1993 and in spring 1995, before and during the condom availability program. These data were compared with data from nationally representative surveys administered at the same time. RESULTS: Seattle students obtained an average of 4.6 condoms per year, the vast majority from baskets and very few from vending machines. Relative to the national samples, the percentage of Seattle students who had ever had sex remained stable after the program began; current sexual activity decreased significantly; and the percentage of sexually experienced students who used a condom the last time they had sex decreased significantly, particularly in the 5 schools with baskets of condoms in clinics. CONCLUSIONS: Making condoms available in Seattle schools enabled students to obtain relatively large numbers of condoms but did not lead to increases in either sexual activity or condom use.

Full text

PDF
182

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brown N. L., Pennylegion M. T., Hillard P. A process evaluation of condom availability in the Seattle, Washington public schools. J Sch Health. 1997 Oct;67(8):336–340. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.1997.tb03469.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Furstenberg F. F., Jr, Geitz L. M., Teitler J. O., Weiss C. C. Does condom availability make a difference? An evaluation of Philadelphia's health resource centers. Fam Plann Perspect. 1997 May-Jun;29(3):123–127. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Guttmacher S., Lieberman L., Ward D., Freudenberg N., Radosh A., Des Jarlais D. Condom availability in New York City public high schools: relationships to condom use and sexual behavior. Am J Public Health. 1997 Sep;87(9):1427–1433. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.9.1427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kirby D. B., Brown N. L. Condom availability programs in U.S. schools. Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 Sep-Oct;28(5):196–202. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Schuster M. A., Bell R. M., Berry S. H., Kanouse D. E. Impact of a high school condom availability program on sexual attitudes and behaviors. Fam Plann Perspect. 1998 Mar-Apr;30(2):67-72, 88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES