Skip to main content
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1998 Nov;88(11):1721–1726. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.11.1721

Economic organization of medicine and the Committee on the Costs of Medical Care.

B B Perkins 1
PMCID: PMC1508565  PMID: 9807547

Abstract

Recent strategies in managed care and managed competition illustrate how health care reforms may reproduce the patterns of economic organization of their times. Such a reform approach is not a new development in the United States. The work of the 1927-1932 Committee on the Costs of Medical Care exemplifies an earlier effort that applied forms of economic organization to medical care. The committee tried to restructure medicine along lines consistent with its economic environment while attributing its models variously to science, profession, and business. Like current approaches, the committee's reports defined costs as the major problem and business models of organization as the major solution. The reports recommended expanded financial management and group medicine, which would include growth in self-supporting middle-class services such as fee clinics and middle-rate hospital units. Identifying these elements as corporate practice of medicine, the American Medical Association-based minority dissented from the final report in favor of conserving individual entrepreneurial practice. This continuum in forms of economic organization has limited structural reform strategies in medicine for the remainder of the century.

Full text

PDF
1721

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Davis M. M. GROUP MEDICINE. Am J Public Health (N Y) 1919 May;9(5):358–362. doi: 10.2105/ajph.9.5.358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fee E. The social history of the hospital: from charity care to the management of medicine: a review essay. Radic Hist Rev. 1984;(28-30):472–481. doi: 10.1215/01636545-1984-28-30-472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fox D. M. From reform to relativism: a history of economists and health care. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1979 Summer;57(3):297–336. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fox D. M. History and health policy: an autobiographical note on the decline of historicism. J Soc Hist. 1985;18(3):349–364. doi: 10.1353/jsh/18.3.349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kunitz S. J. Efficiency and reform in the financing and organization of American medicine in the progressive era. Bull Hist Med. 1981 Winter;55(4):497–515. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Porter D. The mission of social history of medicine: an historical view. Soc Hist Med. 1995 Dec;8(3):345–359. doi: 10.1093/shm/8.3.345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pumphrey R. E. Michael M. Davis and the development of the Health Care Movement, 1900-1928. Societas. 1972 Winter;2(1):27–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. ROREM C. R. Developments in group medical practice. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1958 Aug;48(8):983–986. doi: 10.2105/ajph.48.8.983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Schroeder S. A. Group practice recommendations of the Committee on the Costs of Medical Care: a new look at an old issue. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1978 Spring;56(2):169–186. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Walker F. A. Americanism versus sovietism: a study of the reaction to the committee on the costs of medical care. Bull Hist Med. 1979 Winter;53(4):489–504. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES