Skip to main content
NCBI home page
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1998 Nov;88(11):1623–1629. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.11.1623

The effect of expanding Medicaid prenatal services on birth outcomes.

L M Baldwin 1, E H Larson 1, F A Connell 1, D Nordlund 1, K C Cain 1, M L Cawthon 1, P Byrns 1, R A Rosenblatt 1
PMCID: PMC1508570  PMID: 9807527

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Over 80% of US states have implemented expansions in prenatal services for Medicaid-enrolled women, including case management, nutritional and psychosocial counseling, health education, and home visiting. This study evaluates the effect of Washington State's expansion of such services on prenatal care use and low-birthweight rates. METHODS: The change in prenatal care use and low-birthweight rates among Washington's Medicaid-enrolled pregnant women before and after initiation of expanded prenatal services was compared with the change in these outcomes in Colorado, a control state. RESULTS: The percentage of expected prenatal visits completed increased significantly, from 84% to 87%, in both states. Washington's low-birthweight rate decreased (7.1% to 6.4%, P = .12), while Colorado's rate increased slightly (10.4% to 10.6%, P = .74). Washington's improvement was largely due to decreases in low-birthweight rates for medically high-risk women (18.0% to 13.7%, P = .01, for adults; 22.5% to 11.5%, P = .03, for teenagers), especially those with preexisting medical conditions. CONCLUSIONS: A statewide Medicaid-sponsored support service and case management program was associated with a decrease in the low-birthweight rate of medically high-risk women.

Full text

PDF
1623

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ananth C. V., Peedicayil A., Savitz D. A. Effect of hypertensive diseases in pregnancy on birthweight, gestational duration, and small-for-gestational-age births. Epidemiology. 1995 Jul;6(4):391–395. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199507000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blondel B., Bréart G. Home visits during pregnancy: consequences on pregnancy outcome, use of health services, and women's situations. Semin Perinatol. 1995 Aug;19(4):263–271. doi: 10.1016/s0146-0005(05)80040-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Buescher P. A., Roth M. S., Williams D., Goforth C. M. An evaluation of the impact of maternity care coordination on Medicaid birth outcomes in North Carolina. Am J Public Health. 1991 Dec;81(12):1625–1629. doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.12.1625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Buescher P. A., Smith C., Holliday J. L., Levine R. H. Source of prenatal care and infant birth weight: the case of a North Carolina county. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Jan;156(1):204–210. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(87)90239-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Buescher P. A., Taylor K. P., Davis M. H., Bowling J. M. The quality of the new birth certificate data: a validation study in North Carolina. Am J Public Health. 1993 Aug;83(8):1163–1165. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.8.1163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Farrag O. A. Prospective study of 3 metabolic regimens in pregnant diabetics. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1987 Feb;27(1):6–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1987.tb00921.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gold R. B., Singh S., Frost J. The Medicaid eligibility expansions for pregnant women: evaluating the strength of state implementation efforts. Fam Plann Perspect. 1993 Sep-Oct;25(5):196–207. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Goldenberg R. L., Andrews W. W. Intrauterine infection and why preterm prevention programs have failed. Am J Public Health. 1996 Jun;86(6):781–783. doi: 10.2105/ajph.86.6.781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Haas J. S., Udvarhelyi I. S., Morris C. N., Epstein A. M. The effect of providing health coverage to poor uninsured pregnant women in Massachusetts. JAMA. 1993 Jan 6;269(1):87–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Heins H. C., Jr, Nance N. W., Ferguson J. E. Social support in improving perinatal outcome: the Resource Mothers Program. Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Aug;70(2):263–266. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Heins H. C., Jr, Nance N. W., McCarthy B. J., Efird C. M. A randomized trial of nurse-midwifery prenatal care to reduce low birth weight. Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Mar;75(3 Pt 1):341–345. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hueston W. J. A critical assessment of preterm labor prevention strategies. J Fam Pract. 1992 Jul;35(1):81–89. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kitzman H., Olds D. L., Henderson C. R., Jr, Hanks C., Cole R., Tatelbaum R., McConnochie K. M., Sidora K., Luckey D. W., Shaver D. Effect of prenatal and infancy home visitation by nurses on pregnancy outcomes, childhood injuries, and repeated childbearing. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1997 Aug 27;278(8):644–652. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kotelchuck M. An evaluation of the Kessner Adequacy of Prenatal Care Index and a proposed Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index. Am J Public Health. 1994 Sep;84(9):1414–1420. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.9.1414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mustard C. A., Roos N. P. The relationship of prenatal care and pregnancy complications to birthweight in Winnipeg, Canada. Am J Public Health. 1994 Sep;84(9):1450–1457. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.9.1450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Olds D. L., Henderson C. R., Jr, Tatelbaum R., Chamberlin R. Improving the delivery of prenatal care and outcomes of pregnancy: a randomized trial of nurse home visitation. Pediatrics. 1986 Jan;77(1):16–28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Piper J. M., Mitchel E. F., Jr, Ray W. A. Evaluation of a program for prenatal care case management. Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 Mar-Apr;28(2):65–68. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Piper J. M., Mitchel E. F., Jr, Ray W. A. Expanded Medicaid coverage for pregnant women to 100 percent of the federal poverty level. Am J Prev Med. 1994 Mar-Apr;10(2):97–102. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Piper J. M., Mitchel E. F., Jr, Snowden M., Hall C., Adams M., Taylor P. Validation of 1989 Tennessee birth certificates using maternal and newborn hospital records. Am J Epidemiol. 1993 Apr 1;137(7):758–768. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Piper J. M., Ray W. A., Griffin M. R. Effects of Medicaid eligibility expansion on prenatal care and pregnancy outcome in Tennessee. JAMA. 1990 Nov 7;264(17):2219–2223. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ray W. A., Mitchel E. F., Jr, Piper J. M. Effect of Medicaid expansions on preterm birth. Am J Prev Med. 1997 Jul-Aug;13(4):292–297. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Reichman N. E., Florio M. J. The effects of enriched prenatal care services on Medicaid birth outcomes in New Jersey. J Health Econ. 1996 Aug;15(4):455–476. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(96)00491-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sokol R. J., Woolf R. B., Rosen M. G., Weingarden K. Risk, antepartum care, and outcome: impact of a maternity and infant care project. Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Aug;56(2):150–156. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Velentgas P., Benga-De E., Williams M. A. Chronic hypertension, pregnancy-induced hypertension, and low birthweight. Epidemiology. 1994 May;5(3):345–348. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199405000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Villar J., Farnot U., Barros F., Victora C., Langer A., Belizan J. M. A randomized trial of psychosocial support during high-risk pregnancies. The Latin American Network for Perinatal and Reproductive Research. N Engl J Med. 1992 Oct 29;327(18):1266–1271. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199210293271803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES