Skip to main content
NCBI home page
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1999 Oct;89(10):1514–1521. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.10.1514

Assessing the effects of welfare reform policies on reproductive and infant health.

P Wise 1, W Chavkin 1, D Romero 1
PMCID: PMC1508818  PMID: 10511833

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The welfare reform law of 1996 marked a historical moment in US policy toward the poor by ending the entitlement to cash assistance, by requiring work, and by establishing time limits. This article examines the potential impact on the health of women and children, the primary recipients of welfare benefits. METHODS: The authors outline the reproductive health outcomes most likely to be sensitive to welfare policies, identify indicators that might be used to assess these outcomes, review empirical evidence, and suggest specific methods and data sources. RESULTS: State welfare requirements could improve health outcomes or deter families from Medicaid and food stamps, as well as income support, thus worsening health outcomes. National and state data may prove useful in detecting these effects; however, new data sources may be required for specific health-related questions. CONCLUSIONS: Assessing the effects of welfare policies on reproductive and infant health is possible, although challenging. Reauthorization of the legislation is required in 2002; it is essential that the consequences for health be included in the next round of public debate.

Full text

PDF
1514

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Berkowitz G. S. Employment-related physical activity and pregnancy outcome. J Am Med Womens Assoc. 1995 Sep-Oct;50(5):167-9, 174. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blank R. M., George C. C., London R. A. State abortion rates. The impact of policies, providers, politics, demographics, and economic environment. J Health Econ. 1996 Oct;15(5):513–553. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(96)00494-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Donovan P. The 'illegitimacy bonus' and state efforts to reduce out-of wedlock births. Fam Plann Perspect. 1999 Mar-Apr;31(2):94–97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Forrest J. D., Fordyce R. R. Women's contraceptive attitudes and use in 1992. Fam Plann Perspect. 1993 Jul-Aug;25(4):175–179. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Henshaw S. K. Abortion incidence and services in the United States, 1995-1996. Fam Plann Perspect. 1998 Nov-Dec;30(6):263-70, 287. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Henshaw S. K., Van Vort J. Abortion services in the United States, 1991 and 1992. Fam Plann Perspect. 1994 May-Jun;26(3):100-6, 112. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hillier S. L., Nugent R. P., Eschenbach D. A., Krohn M. A., Gibbs R. S., Martin D. H., Cotch M. F., Edelman R., Pastorek J. G., 2nd, Rao A. V. Association between bacterial vaginosis and preterm delivery of a low-birth-weight infant. The Vaginal Infections and Prematurity Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1995 Dec 28;333(26):1737–1742. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199512283332604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jones E. F., Forrest J. D. Underreporting of abortion in surveys of U.S. women: 1976 to 1988. Demography. 1992 Feb;29(1):113–126. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lichter D. T., McLaughlin D. K., Ribar D. C. State abortion policy, geographic access to abortion providers and changing family formation. Fam Plann Perspect. 1998 Nov-Dec;30(6):281–287. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lundberg S., Plotnick R. D. Effects of state welfare, abortion and family planning policies on premarital childbearing among white adolescents. Fam Plann Perspect. 1990 Nov-Dec;22(6):246-51, 275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Matthews S., Ribar D., Wilhelm M. The effects of economic conditions and access to reproductive health services on state abortion rates and birthrates. Fam Plann Perspect. 1997 Mar-Apr;29(2):52–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Moore K. A., Caldwell S. B. The effect of government policies on out-of-wedlock sex and pregnancy. Fam Plann Perspect. 1977 Jul-Aug;9(4):164–169. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. O'Campo P., Rojas-Smith L. Welfare reform and women's health: review of the literature and implications for state policy. J Public Health Policy. 1998;19(4):420–446. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Parker J. D., Schoendorf K. C., Kiely J. L. Associations between measures of socioeconomic status and low birth weight, small for gestational age, and premature delivery in the United States. Ann Epidemiol. 1994 Jul;4(4):271–278. doi: 10.1016/1047-2797(94)90082-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Piccinino L. J., Mosher W. D. Trends in contraceptive use in the United States: 1982-1995. Fam Plann Perspect. 1998 Jan-Feb;30(1):4-10, 46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Singh S. Adolescent pregnancy in the United States: an interstate analysis. Fam Plann Perspect. 1986 Sep-Oct;18(5):210–220. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wise P. H. Confronting racial disparities in infant mortality: reconciling science and politics. Am J Prev Med. 1993 Nov-Dec;9(6 Suppl):7–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES