Skip to main content
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1998 May;88(5):813–816. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.5.813

Validity of insurance information on California birth certificates.

P Braveman 1, M Pearl 1, S Egerter 1, K Marchi 1, R Williams 1
PMCID: PMC1508950  PMID: 9585754

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the validity of health insurance information on California birth certificates. METHODS: Insurance information from birth certificates and linked face-to-face interviews was compared for 7428 postpartum women in California. RESULTS: There was excellent agreement between insurance information in birth certificate and interview data, especially when capitated plans were grouped with all other private coverage. Analyses using both data sources produced similar estimates of the likelihood of untimely prenatal care according to type of insurance coverage. CONCLUSIONS: Birth certificate data including insurance information appear to be an appropriate resource for examining both the extent of coverage for maternity care and associations between prenatal care use and insurance status.

Full text

PDF
813

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Braveman P., Bennett T., Lewis C., Egerter S., Showstack J. Access to prenatal care following major Medicaid eligibility expansions. JAMA. 1993 Mar 10;269(10):1285–1289. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Buescher P. A., Taylor K. P., Davis M. H., Bowling J. M. The quality of the new birth certificate data: a validation study in North Carolina. Am J Public Health. 1993 Aug;83(8):1163–1165. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.8.1163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Frost F., Starzyk P., George S., McLaughlin J. F. Birth complication reporting: the effect of birth certificate design. Am J Public Health. 1984 May;74(5):505–506. doi: 10.2105/ajph.74.5.505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Piper J. M., Mitchel E. F., Jr, Snowden M., Hall C., Adams M., Taylor P. Validation of 1989 Tennessee birth certificates using maternal and newborn hospital records. Am J Epidemiol. 1993 Apr 1;137(7):758–768. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Snell L. M., Little B. B., Knoll K. A., Johnston W. L., Jr, Rosenfeld C. R., Gant N. F. Reliability of birth certificate reporting of congenital anomalies. Am J Perinatol. 1992 May;9(3):219–222. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-999325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Starr P., Starr S. Reinventing vital statistics. The impact of changes in information technology, welfare policy, and health care. Public Health Rep. 1995 Sep-Oct;110(5):534–544. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Watkins M. L., Edmonds L., McClearn A., Mullins L., Mulinare J., Khoury M. The surveillance of birth defects: the usefulness of the revised US standard birth certificate. Am J Public Health. 1996 May;86(5):731–734. doi: 10.2105/ajph.86.5.731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES