Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study examined the prevalence and effects of potential barriers to removal of levonorgestrel implants (Norplant) among low-income women. METHODS: A sample of 687 women who received Norplant at hospital-based family planning clinics were interviewed before Norplant insertion and 6 months after Norplant insertion (or at Norplant removal if removal occurred earlier). Those who continued to use Norplant were reinterviewed at 2 years or at removal. RESULTS: In a multivariate analysis, only 1 of the 4 potential barriers--cost--significantly impeded Norplant discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: Family planning clinics need to make clear that they follow a policy of Norplant removal on demand, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Cushman L. F., Davidson A. R., Kalmuss D., Heartwell S., Rulin M. Beliefs about Norplant implants among low income urban women. Contraception. 1996 May;53(5):285–291. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davidson A. R., Kalmuss D. Topics for our times: Norplant coercion--an overstated threat. Am J Public Health. 1997 Apr;87(4):550–551. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.4.550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Forrest J. D., Kaeser L. Questions of balance: issues emerging from the introduction of the hormonal implant. Fam Plann Perspect. 1993 May-Jun;25(3):127–132. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kalmuss D., Davidson A. R., Cushman L. F., Heartwell S., Rulin M. Determinants of early implant discontinuation among low-income women. Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 Nov-Dec;28(6):256–260. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moskowitz E. H., Jennings B., Callahan D. Long-acting contraceptives. Ethical guidance for policymakers and health care providers. Hastings Cent Rep. 1995 Jan-Feb;25(1):S1–S8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]