Skip to main content
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1998 Sep;88(9):1387–1389. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.9.1387

Hyaline membrane disease is underreported in a linked birth-infant death certificate database.

A Hamvas 1, P Kwong 1, M DeBaun 1, W Schramm 1, F S Cole 1
PMCID: PMC1509088  PMID: 9736884

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the Missouri State Department of Health linked birth-infant death certificate database and medical records with respect to recording hyaline membrane disease in very low-birth-weight infants. METHODS: We reviewed the records for all 976 infants weighing 500 to 1500 g who were born to St. Louis, Mo, residents in 1989, 1991, and 1992. RESULTS: Eighteen percent of the birth certificates and 54% of the medical records documented hyaline membrane disease, resulting in 34% sensitivity and 99% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: The Missouri State Department of Health birth-infant death certificate database underestimates the incidence of hyaline membrane disease, which suggest that national statistics for the disease are also underestimated.

Full text

PDF
1387

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Buescher P. A., Taylor K. P., Davis M. H., Bowling J. M. The quality of the new birth certificate data: a validation study in North Carolina. Am J Public Health. 1993 Aug;83(8):1163–1165. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.8.1163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. DeBaun M., Rowley D., Province M., Stockbauer J. W., Cole F. S. Selected antepartum medical complications and very-low-birthweight infants among black and white women. Am J Public Health. 1994 Sep;84(9):1495–1497. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.9.1495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Freedman M. A., Gay G. A., Brockert J. E., Potrzebowski P. W., Rothwell C. J. The 1989 revisions of the US Standard Certificates of Live Birth and Death and the US Standard Report of Fetal Death. Am J Public Health. 1988 Feb;78(2):168–172. doi: 10.2105/ajph.78.2.168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hamvas A., Wise P. H., Yang R. K., Wampler N. S., Noguchi A., Maurer M. M., Walentik C. A., Schramm W. F., Cole F. S. The influence of the wider use of surfactant therapy on neonatal mortality among blacks and whites. N Engl J Med. 1996 Jun 20;334(25):1635–1640. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199606203342504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Parrish K. M., Holt V. L., Connell F. A., Williams B., LoGerfo J. P. Variations in the accuracy of obstetric procedures and diagnoses on birth records in Washington State, 1989. Am J Epidemiol. 1993 Jul 15;138(2):119–127. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Piper J. M., Mitchel E. F., Jr, Snowden M., Hall C., Adams M., Taylor P. Validation of 1989 Tennessee birth certificates using maternal and newborn hospital records. Am J Epidemiol. 1993 Apr 1;137(7):758–768. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Taffel S. M., Ventura S. J., Gay G. A. Revised U.S. certificate of birth--new opportunities for research on birth outcome. Birth. 1989 Dec;16(4):188–193. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536x.1989.tb00896.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wegman M. E. Annual summary of vital statistics--1992. Pediatrics. 1993 Dec;92(6):743–754. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES