Skip to main content
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 1995 Sep;103(Suppl 6):213–222. doi: 10.1289/ehp.95103s6213

Science and policy in regulatory decision making: getting the facts right about hazardous air pollutants.

K Sexton 1
PMCID: PMC1518925  PMID: 8549476

Abstract

Hazardous air pollutants are regulated under Title III of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments. The Amendments replace the risk-based approach mandated in the 1977 Amendments with a prescriptive, technology-based approach requiring that maximum achievable control technology (MACT) be applied to all major industrial sources of 189 hazardous air pollutants. The change reflects political, rather than scientific consensus that the public health benefits justify the costs. The choice is put into perspective by looking at the interface between science and policy that occurs as part of regular decisionmaking. Particular emphasis is given to examining the interrelationships among facts (science), judgments (science policy), and policy (values) in the context of the risk assessment paradigm. Science and policy are discussed in relation to Title III, contrasting the political consensus for action with the scientific uncertainty about risks and benefits. It is argued that a balanced research program is needed to get the facts right about hazardous air pollutants, including research to meet statutory requirements, to reduce uncertainties in risk assessment, and to address strategic issues.

Full text

PDF
213

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Browner C. M. Protecting the Environment: EPA's Role. Science. 1993 Sep 10;261(5127):1373–1373. doi: 10.1126/science.261.5127.1373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. McIntosh H. Catching up on the Clean Air Act. Environ Health Perspect. 1993 Aug;101(3):226–229. doi: 10.1289/ehp.101-1519770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Romagnolo D., Selmin O. Renovating Italian science. Science. 1994 Mar 25;263(5154):1669–1669. doi: 10.1126/science.8134828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ruch R. B., Jr, Howell J. S., Jr Proactive industrial strategies for the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. J Air Waste Manage Assoc. 1991 Jul;41(7):922–927. doi: 10.1080/10473289.1991.10466888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Sexton K., Olden K., Johnson B. L. "Environmental justice": the central role of research in establishing a credible scientific foundation for informed decision making. Toxicol Ind Health. 1993 Sep-Oct;9(5):685–727. doi: 10.1177/074823379300900504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sexton K. The role of scientific research in risk assessment and risk management decisions. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1992 Jun;106(6):635–641. doi: 10.1177/019459989210600604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES