Abstract
The modeling of cohort data based on the Armitage-Doll multistage model of the carcinogenic process has gained popular acceptance as a methodology for quantitative risk assessment for estimating the dose-related relationships between different occupational and environmental carcinogenic exposures and cancer mortality. The multistage model can be used for extrapolation to low doses relevant for setting environmental standards and also provides information regarding whether more than one stage is dose-related, which assists in determining whether different carcinogens affect different stages of the cancer process. This paper summarizes recent developments in the multistage modeling of cohort data and emphasizes practical issues such as handling data arising from large epidemiologic follow-up studies, the time-dependent nature of exposures and statistical issues such as multicollinearity in time-related variables, robustness of parameter estimates, validating of the fitted models, and routine inferential procedures. Problems related to uncertainties of risk estimates are discussed also. Computer programs for fitting multistage models with one or two dose-related stages to cohort data incorporating time-dependent exposure patterns; constructing confidence regions for model parameters; and predicting lifetime risks of dying from cancer adjusting for competing causes of death are detailed. Illustrations are provided using lung cancer mortality in a cohort of nonwhite male coke oven workers exposed to coal tar pitch volatiles.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Brown C. C., Chu K. C. A new method for the analysis of cohort studies: implications of the multistage theory of carcinogenesis applied to occupational arsenic exposure. Environ Health Perspect. 1983 Apr;50:293–308. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8350293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brown C. C., Chu K. C. Use of multistage models to infer stage affected by carcinogenic exposure: example of lung cancer and cigarette smoking. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40 (Suppl 2):171S–179S. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9681(87)80020-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Day N. E., Brown C. C. Multistage models and primary prevention of cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1980 Apr;64(4):977–989. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dong M. H., Redmond C. K., Mazumdar S., Costantino J. P. A multistage approach to the cohort analysis of lifetime lung cancer risk among steelworkers exposed to coke oven emissions. Am J Epidemiol. 1988 Oct;128(4):860–873. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gail M. Measuring the benefit of reduced exposure to environmental carcinogens. J Chronic Dis. 1975 Mar;28(3):135–147. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(75)90002-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gibb H. J., Chen C. W. Multistage model interpretation of additive and multiplicative carcinogenic effects. Risk Anal. 1986 Jun;6(2):167–170. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1986.tb00204.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moolgavkar S. H. Carcinogenesis modeling: from molecular biology to epidemiology. Annu Rev Public Health. 1986;7:151–169. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.07.050186.001055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moolgavkar S. H., Knudson A. G., Jr Mutation and cancer: a model for human carcinogenesis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1981 Jun;66(6):1037–1052. doi: 10.1093/jnci/66.6.1037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]