Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1999 Jan 19;96(2):742–747. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.2.742

Endoplasmic reticulum and trans-Golgi network generate distinct populations of Alzheimer β-amyloid peptides

Jeffrey P Greenfield *,†, Julia Tsai , Gunnar K Gouras *,†, Bing Hai *, Gopal Thinakaran , Frederic Checler §, Sangram S Sisodia , Paul Greengard *, Huaxi Xu *,
PMCID: PMC15207  PMID: 9892704

Abstract

The excessive generation and accumulation of 40- and 42-aa β-amyloid peptides (Aβ40/Aβ42) in selectively vulnerable brain regions is a major neuropathological feature of Alzheimer’s disease. Aβ, derived by proteolytic cleavage from the β-amyloid precursor protein (βAPP), is normally secreted. However, recent evidence suggests that significant levels of Aβ also may remain inside cells. Here, we have investigated the subcellular compartments within which distinct amyloid species are generated and the compartments from which they are secreted. Three experimental approaches were used: (i) immunofluorescence performed in intact cortical neurons; (ii) sucrose gradient fractionation performed with mouse neuroblastoma cells stably expressing wild-type βAPP695 (N2a695); and (iii) cell-free reconstitution of Aβ generation and trafficking from N2a695 cells. These studies demonstrate that: (i) Aβ40 (Aβ1–40 plus Aβx-40, where x is an NH2-terminal truncation) is generated exclusively within the trans-Golgi Network (TGN) and packaged into post-TGN secretory vesicles; (ii) Aβx-42 is made and retained within the endoplasmic reticulum in an insoluble state; (iii) Aβ42 (Aβ1–42 plus Aβx-42) is made in the TGN and packaged into secretory vesicles; and (iv) the amyloid peptides formed in the TGN consist of two pools (a soluble population extractable with detergents and a detergent-insoluble form). The identification of the organelles in which distinct forms of Aβ are generated and from which they are secreted should facilitate the identification of the proteolytic enzymes responsible for their formation.


Alzheimer’s disease (AD), the most common form of dementia in the elderly, is characterized clinically by the insidious onset and inexorable progression of dementia, and pathologically by the abnormal accumulation of amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles in vulnerable brain regions. Plaques are composed of variously sized β-amyloid peptides (Aβ) derived through proteolytic processing of the β-amyloid precursor protein (βAPP). Mutations within βAPP were discovered to cause autosomal dominant familial AD (FAD) (1, 2), implicating βAPP in the etiology of this disease. In addition, early-onset FAD also segregates with two other genes, the presenilin 1 (PS1) gene (3) and the presenilin 2 (PS2) gene (4), which appear to cause FAD by increasing the ratio of Aβ ending with amino acid 42 (Aβ42) versus Aβ ending with amino acid 40 (Aβ40) (5, 6). Aβ42 is more highly amyloidogenic than Aβ40 (7) and is believed to form the core of the amyloid plaques, despite being produced far less abundantly than Aβ40. Any one of several diverse molecular anomalies of βAPP metabolism may lead to AD.

βAPP, an integral membrane glycoprotein, matures through the secretory pathway and is metabolically processed by at least two distinct pathways. Cleavage of βAPP by an enzyme, α-secretase, in a late secretory compartment, or at the cell surface, generates a large βAPP fragment (sβAPPα). This cleavage, within the Aβ coding region, precludes formation of Aβ. Alternatively, cleavage by two enzymes, β- and γ-secretase, is believed to generate the majority of β-amyloid variants (8). βAPP is initially synthesized and cotranslationally inserted into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Recently, evidence has been obtained for the presence of Aβ42 within the ER (912), but it was not determined whether the peptides found in the ER were packaged into vesicles for trafficking through the late secretory pathway. In addition, finding Aβ species in the ER does not demonstrate that they were generated there; retrograde transport of proteins from the Golgi complex and trans-Golgi Network (TGN) to the ER has been documented (13, 14). Finally, reports of Aβ42 in the ER have been based primarily on ELISA assays using C-terminal specific antibodies. These assays cannot distinguish between the N termini of captured peptides and thus do not distinguish between full-length and N-truncated species both of which may end at amino acid 42.

The majority of βAPP molecules are transported through the secretory pathway to the TGN. The TGN has many known cellular functions including sorting secretory proteins, lysosomal enzymes, and plasma membrane proteins, and proteolytically cleaving prohormones (15). These functions, the localization of βAPP within the TGN, and the TGN′s acidic pH, which is optimal for the activity of many processing enzymes, suggested that Aβ generation might occur within the TGN or late Golgi (16). Generation of Aβ peptides within the TGN first was demonstrated in a cell-free system derived from cells expressing βAPP harboring the Swedish double-point mutation (17). The identity of the Aβ found in the TGN was not established.

In this study we were able to determine the sites of generation and identities of several Aβ species by using a well-characterized (15, 18) cell-free assay. In addition, we determined which species contributed to the secreted pool of peptides and which were retained intracellularly. Finally, we demonstrated that within the ER and TGN Aβ can be separated into biochemically distinct pools based on their solubility. These in vitro observations were consistent with results obtained by performing cell fractionation and immunofluorescence studies in intact cells.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell Lines.

Neuroblastoma (N2a) cells doubly transfected with human βAPP695 and human wild-type PS1 were maintained in medium containing 50% DMEM, 50% Opti-MEM, supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum, 200 μg/ml of G418, and antibiotics (GIBCO/BRL). Cells were induced with 10 mM n-butyric acid (Sigma) to stimulate βAPP transcription 12 h before performing metabolic labeling experiments.

Neuronal Cultures.

Primary rat neuronal cultures were derived from the cerebral cortices of embryonic day 17 embryos obtained from timed-pregnant Sprague–Dawley rats (Charles River Breeding Laboratories) as described (19). Brains were removed, and cortices and meninges were excised from the remaining brain. Cortices were triturated in glass pipettes until cells were dissociated. Cells were counted in a hemocytometer and plated in equal amounts in serum-free Neurobasal media with N2 supplement (GIBCO), 25 mM glutamate, and 0.5 mM l-glutamine on poly-d-lysine-treated (0.1 mg/ml; Sigma) 100-mm dishes (Fisher) (approximately 8–10 × 106 cells per plate) for biochemical analyses, or on microscope cover slides (Fisher) at low concentrations for immunofluorescence studies. More than 95% of cells in the preparations were neurons (19).

Antibodies.

Polyclonal antibody 369 recognizes the C terminus of βAPP; FCA3340 recognizes Aβ40, but not Aβ42; FCA3542 recognizes Aβ42, but not Aβ40; FCA18 recognizes Aβ1-x, where x is an NH2-terminal truncation (20); anti-TGN38 was obtained from Affinity BioReagents, Golden, CO; anti-calnexin and anti-ER-restricted binding protein (BIP) were obtained from StressGen Biotechnologies, Victoria, Canada; anti-EEA1 was obtained from Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY; fluorescent secondary antibodies Alexa 488 goat anti-mouse and Alexa 594 goat anti-rabbit were obtained from Molecular Probes.

Enzymes and Drugs.

Complete protease inhibitor mixture tablets, adenosine-5′-triphosphate, guanosine-5′-triphosphate, creatine phosphate, and creatine phosphokinase were obtained from Boehringer Mannheim.

Immunofluorescence.

Immunofluorescence was performed on embryonic day 17 primary neuronal cultures that had been grown for 3 days on poly-d-lysine-coated no. 1 round glass coverslips (Fisher). Cells were washed three times with PBS containing 0.2 mM CaCl2 and 2 mM MgCl2 (PBS/CM) on ice, fixed with prechilled (−80°C) methanol for 25 min at −20°C, and rehydrated with 3× 5-min washes of PBS/CM at room temperature. Cells were quenched with 50 mM NH4Cl in PBS/CM for 10 min and rinsed with PBS/CM before being permeabilized and blocked with 0.075% saponin in PBS/CM/0.2% BSA buffer for 30 min at room temperature. Primary antibodies diluted in the PBS/CM/BSA/Saponin buffer (buffer A) were added for 1 h at room temperature, followed by 3× 10-min washes with buffer A. Appropriate fluorescent species-specific secondary antibody conjugates, diluted in buffer A, were added, and incubations were carried out for 1 h at room temperature. After 3× 10-min washes with buffer A, coverslips were mounted with a ProLong Antifade Kit (Molecular Probes) on glass slides. Antibody dilutions were: FCA3340, 1:750; FCA3542, 1:750; FCA18, 1:750; anti-TGN38, 1:500; anti-calnexin, 1:1,000; anti-EEA1, 1:500; fluorescent secondary antibodies Alexa 488 goat anti-mouse and Alexa 594 goat anti-rabbit, 1:500. In each experiment fluorescence was shown to be negligible in the absence of primary antibody.

Confocal Microscopy.

Images were collected and analyzed on a confocal laser scanning microscope (model LSM 510, Zeiss) using a 63× water immersion lens and rhodamine or fluorescein isothiocyanate filters. Images were converted into tiff format and processed by using Adobe Photoshop Software (version 3.0.5, Mountain View, CA) and printed on a color laser printer.

Sucrose Gradients.

To separate and enrich TGN and ER membranes, cells were homogenized by using a stainless steel ball-bearing homogenizer in 0.25 M sucrose, 10 mM Tris⋅HCl (pH 7.4), 1 mM MgAc2, and a protease inhibitor mixture in a final concentration of 1 vol of cell pellet per 5 vol of homogenizing medium. The homogenate was loaded on top of a step gradient comprised of 1 ml of 2 M sucrose, 4 ml of 1.3 M sucrose, 3.5 ml of 1.16 M sucrose, and 2.0 ml of 0.8 M sucrose. All solutions contained 10 mM Tris⋅HCl, pH 7.4, and 1 mM MgAc2. The gradients were centrifuged for 2.5 h at 100,000 × g in a Beckman SW41Ti rotor. Twelve 1-ml fractions were collected from the top of each gradient and assayed for total protein by the method of Bradford. TGN-38, BIP, and βAPP were assayed by running fractions on 4–12% SDS/PAGE, transferring the proteins onto poly(vinylidene difluoride) membranes, and performing Western blot analysis. Aβ40, Aβ42, and Aβ1-x were assayed by metabolic labeling-immunoprecipitation with FCA3340, FCA3542, and FCA18, respectively.

Preparation of Permeabilized N2a Cells.

It is well established that incubation of cells at 15°C (18) or 20°C (15, 24) leads to an accumulation of membrane and secretory proteins in the ER and TGN, respectively. To assay Aβ generation in the TGN, cells were pulse-labeled with [35S]methionine (500 μCi/ml) for 15 min at 37°C, washed with PBS (prewarmed to 20°C), and chased for 2 h at 20°C in complete media prewarmed to 20°C. To assay for Aβ generation in the ER, cells were pulse-labeled with [35S]methionine (500 μCi/ml) for 4 h at 15°C. For both types of preparation, cells were permeabilized at the termination of the incubation. For this purpose, cells were incubated at 4°C in swelling buffer (10 mM KCl/10 mM Hepes, pH 7.2) for 10 min. The buffer was aspirated and replaced with 1 ml of breaking buffer (90 mM KCl/10 mM Hepes, pH 7.2), after which the cells were broken by scraping with a rubber policeman. The cells were centrifuged at 800 × g for 5 min, washed in breaking buffer, and resuspended in 5 vol of breaking buffer. This procedure resulted in >95% cell breakage evaluated by staining with trypan blue. Broken cells (approx. 2 × 106 cells) were incubated in a final volume of 300 μl containing 2.5 mm MgCl2, 0.5 mM CaCl2, 110 mM KCl, and an energy-regenerating system consisting of 1 mM ATP, 0.02 mM GTP, 10 mM creatine phosphate, 80 μg/ml of creatine phosphokinase, and a protease inhibitor cocktail. Incubations were carried out at 15°, 20°, or 37°C as indicated. Each experiment was performed at least three times.

Formation of Nascent Secretory Vesicles in Permeabilized Cells.

After incubation of broken cells, vesicle and membrane fractions were separated by centrifugation at 14,000 rpm for 15 sec at 4°C in a Brinkman centrifuge. Vesicle (supernatant) and membrane (pellet) fractions were extracted with a cell lysis buffer containing 0.5% Nonidet P-40 and 0.5% deoxycholate. In some experiments, membrane fractions were extracted further with 70% formic acid and neutralized with 2 M Tris⋅HCl, pH 8.3.

Immunoprecipitation.

Extracted proteins from the various fractions were brought to 0.5% SDS and heated for 3 min at 75°C. Samples were treated with IP buffer (10 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.4/100 mM sodium chloride/1% Triton X-100), and appropriate antibody was added. After incubating overnight, samples were treated with protein-A Sepharose, and the immunoprecipitable material was analyzed by SDS/PAGE using 10–20% Tricine gels (for Aβ species) or 4–12% Tris-glycine gels (for full-length βAPP).

Densitometry.

Band intensities were analyzed and quantified by using NIH image quant software, version 1.52.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Localization of Aβ40, Aβ42, and Aβ1-x by Double Immunofluroescence Confocal Microscopy.

Cortical cultures derived from embryonic day 17 fetal rat brains were used to examine the subcellular distribution of Aβ terminating at amino acid 40 by using FCA3340. Aβ40 immunoreactivity was limited to an area of the cells that corresponded with the localization of a TGN protein, TGN-38 (Fig. 1a). The distribution of Aβ40 was distinct from that of calnexin, an ER-restricted protein (Fig. 1b). These findings confirm previous biochemical results that suggested the TGN as the primary intracellular site within which Aβ40 exists under steady-state conditions (9, 17).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Localization of Aβ in rat primary neurons by double immunofluorescence confocal microscopy. (a and b) Aβ40 colocalizes with TGN38, but not with calnexin. (c and d) Aβ42 colocalizes with TGN-38 and calnexin. (e and f) Aβ1-x colocalizes with TGN38, but not calnexin. (g) EEA1 has a punctate, cytoplasmic localization, different than that of Aβ40, Aβ42, and Aβ1-x. Aβ were visualized by incubation with primary antibody followed by rhodamine-conjugated (red fluorescence) secondary antibody. TGN-38, calnexin, and EEA1 were used as markers for TGN, ER, and endsomes respectively, and were visualized by incubation with primary antibody followed by fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated (green fluorescence) secondary antibody. Overlays represent digitally merged images. Yellow fluorescence indicates colocalization of β-amyloid with marker protein. (Bar = 10 μm.)

Although Aβ40 does not appear to be generated within an early compartment of the secretory pathway, accumulating evidence has indicated that Aβ42 may be found within an early compartment (912). When we performed immuno-fluorescence with FCA3542, Aβ42 was detected in a pattern that partially overlapped with calnexin (Fig. 1d), providing evidence that Aβ42 is present in the ER under steady-state conditions. Aβ42 also was localized within the TGN (Fig. 1c). These experiments provide evidence that Aβ40 is present in a late Golgi compartment, whereas Aβ42 is present in both early and late organelles of the secretory pathway.

To evaluate the subcellular distribution of non-N-terminal truncated Aβ, immunofluorescence studies were performed by using FCA18. Aβ1-x was restricted to a circumscribed region of the cells that matched the localization of TGN-38 (Fig. 1e), but not calnexin (Fig. 1f). These studies suggest that Aβ42 species seen within the ER may not be full-length Aβ1–42 but rather a truncated Aβx-42 species.

To evaluate a possible localization of Aβ within endosomal compartments (21, 22), we compared the localization of EEA1, a protein that is restricted to endocytic endosomal compartments, with that of Aβ40 and Aβ42. A punctate pattern of staining was found for EEA1 (Fig. 1g), distinct from that observed for Aβ40 (Fig. 1 a and b), Aβ42 (Fig. 1 c and d), and Aβ1-x (Fig. 1 e and f). These findings do not, however, rule out a role for the endocytic pathway in Aβ generation. For instance, a pathway recently has been described (23) through which cell-surface proteins can be delivered to the TGN after trafficking through an endocytic recycling compartment. This pathway could contribute to a lesser extent to Aβ generation in the TGN.

Subcellular Distribution of Aβ40 and Aβ42 by Using Sucrose Gradient Fractionation.

The localization of Aβ also was determined by subcellular fractionation by using TGN-38 and βAPP as markers for the TGN and BIP as a marker for the ER. For determination of Aβ, mouse neuroblastoma cells doubly expressing human βAPP695 and wild-type PS1 were metabolically labeled with [35S]methionine for 4 h. Proteins present in subcellular fractions prepared from these cells were immunoprecipitated with FCA3340 and FCA3542 and analyzed by SDS/PAGE. The distribution of marker proteins was determined by immunoblotting subcellular fractions from unlabeled cells. TGN-38 was localized within fractions 3 and 4 (Fig. 2a), whereas BIP was found mainly in fractions 11 and 12, and to a lesser extent in fractions 8 and 9 (Fig. 2b), presumably representing heavy and light fractions of ER membranes, respectively. βAPP was found in all but the lightest of fractions, but was most heavily concentrated within the TGN-enriched fractions. Immature βAPP was found in both the ER and Golgi fractions, whereas mature βAPP was localized to the Golgi fractions (Fig. 2c).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Localization of Aβ by sucrose gradient fractionation. Rat primary neurons (a) and N2a cells doubly expressing human βAPP695 and wild-type PS1 (b and c) were homogenized, and a postnuclear supernatant was fractionated on an equilibrium flotation sucrose gradient (see Materials and Methods). Proteins from each fraction were precipitated with trichloroacetic acid and separated by 4–12% SDS/PAGE, followed by immunoblotting using antibodies against either (a) TGN-38, (b) BIP, or (c) βAPP. (d and e) N2a cells were labeled with [35S]methionine for 4 h at 37°C followed by fractionation as for a-c. Each fraction was sequentially immunoprecipitated with (d) FCA3340 (anti-Aβ40) and (e) FCA3642 (anti-Aβ42) and analyzed by 10–20% Tricine SDS/PAGE. Arrows indicate mature (m) and immature (im) forms of βAPP, Aβ1–40, Aβx-40, Aβ1–42, and Aβx-42.

1–40 and Aβx-40 were immunoprecipitated from the TGN fractions of labeled cells (Fig. 2d). Both Aβ1–42 and a 3-kDa Aβ, Aβx-42, were detected in the TGN (Fig. 2e). Aβx-42 also was found in the ER (fraction 11) (Fig. 2d). In parallel experiments, Aβ1-x was not detected within the ER, whereas a single 4-kDa species presumably representing Aβ1–40 and Aβ1–42 was detected within TGN fractions (data not shown). Thus the results of the sucrose gradient fractionation studies were in good agreement with results obtained by using double immunofluorescence confocal microscopy.

Reconstitution of βAPP Trafficking from ER and TGN in a Cell-Free System.

Microscopy and fractionation studies do not allow conclusions concerning whether the compartments within which specific Aβ were located were the same compartments within which they were generated. This issue is important because the compartment within which the peptides are generated presumably represents the location of the secretases, the major, as yet-unidentified biological targets for AD therapeutics. We attempted to resolve these questions by designing a cell-based in vitro assay to identify the compartments within which specific peptides are generated and to determine whether those peptides are secreted from those intracellular compartments.

To determine the reliability of this cell-free system for the study of ER- and TGN-specific events, we examined the intracellular trafficking of βAPP. Cells were labeled to accumulate βAPP within either the TGN or ER (see Materials and Methods), permeabilized, and incubated at 37° for 90 min. Only immature βAPP could be recovered from the ER (Fig. 3, lanes 1 and 2), whereas both mature and immature βAPP could be recovered from the TGN (Fig. 3, lanes 5 and 6). To validate the integrity of protein trafficking within this system, βAPP was immunoprecipitated from post-ER and post-TGN vesicles (Fig. 3, lanes 3, 4, 7 and 8). Under complete conditions (see Materials and Methods), ER (Fig. 3, lane 4) and TGN (Fig. 3, lane 8) vesicles each contain approximately 20% of the material found in the membrane (donor) fraction. Vesicle budding from the ER and the TGN are arrested at 15°C and 20°C, respectively (18, 24). Under these conditions, budding of vesicles containing βAPP was almost entirely abolished (Fig. 3, lanes 3 and 7), demonstrating the temperature dependence of the assay. Elimination of the energy-regenerating system reduced vesicle budding by nearly 90% (data not shown). These results indicated that a cell-free assay reconstituted from βAPP695-expressing neuroblastoma cells was a reliable system in which to study the in vitro generation and trafficking of relevant Aβ within and from distinct intracellular compartments.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Cell-free formation of post-ER and post-TGN vesicles containing βAPP. N2a cells were labeled with [35S]methionine either at 15°C for 4 h or at 37°C for 15 min followed by a 2-h chase at 20°C to accumulate labeled βAPP in the ER and TGN, respectively. Cells were permeabilized and incubated (see Materials and Methods) for 90 min with an energy-regenerating system at 15°C (lanes 1 and 3), 20°C (lanes 5 and 7), or 37°C (lanes 2, 4, 6, and 8). After incubation, samples were centrifuged, pellets (lanes 1, 2, 5, and 6) and supernatants (lanes 3, 4, 7, and 8) were immunoprecipitated with polyclonal antibody 369 and separated by SDS/PAGE (4–12%). Arrows indicate the positions of mature and immature βAPP.

Reconstitution of Aβ40 Generation and Trafficking from ER and TGN.

In permeabilized cells in which labeled βAPP had accumulated in the ER, Aβ40 was not detected in either detergent or formic acid extractions (Fig. 4a, lanes 1–4) or in vesicles derived from ER membranes (Fig. 4a, lanes 5 and 6) after in vitro incubations, confirming the immunofluorescence and cell fractionation studies. The absence of Aβ40 is not attributable to a lack of substrate, because full-length βAPP is found in the ER, and the absence of vesicle-associated Aβ is not attributable to deficits in vesicle formation because βAPP is detected in post-ER vesicles (Fig. 3).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Formation of Aβ40 and Aβ42 in a cell-free system. Experiments were performed as described in the legend to Fig. 3. except that, after detergent extraction, insoluble pellets were re-extracted by using 70% formic acid. Detergent-soluble (lanes 1 and 2), detergent-insoluble (lanes 3 and 4), and vesicle-associated (lanes 5 and 6) fractions were analyzed for Aβ40 (a and b) and Aβ42 (c and d) by sequential immunoprecipitation with FCA3440 followed by FCA3642. Immunoprecipitated proteins were subjected to Tricine SDS/PAGE (10–20%) analysis. Arrows indicate the positions of 4-kDa Aβ1–40, 3-kDa Aβx-40, 4-kDa Aβ1–42, and 3-kDa Aβx-42.

In permeabilized cells in which labeled βAPP accumulated in the TGN, detergent extraction, followed by immunoprecipitation with FCA3340 revealed Aβ40 of ≈4 and ≈3 kDa (Fig. 4b, lane 2). The formation of these Aβ species was inhibited at 20°C (Fig. 4b, lane 1). Further extracting the membranes with 70% formic acid followed by immunoprecipitation with FCA3340 revealed a detergent-insoluble pool of Aβ40 (Fig. 4b, lanes 3 and 4). Peptides of 3 and 4 kDa also were detected in post-TGN vesicles at 37°C but not at 20°C (Fig. 4b, lanes 5 and 6). Further experiments will be needed to determine the proportion of vesicle-associated peptides derived from the soluble versus insoluble pools of Aβ40.

Reconstitution of Aβ42 Generation and Trafficking from ER and TGN.

Detergent-soluble Aβ42 was not detected within the ER (Fig. 4c, lanes 1 and 2). However, a large pool of detergent-insoluble Aβx-42 was revealed by formic acid extraction (Fig. 4c, lanes 3 and 4). Aβx-42 produced within the ER was not packaged into ER-derived vesicles (Fig. 4c, lanes 5 and 6), indicating that insoluble Aβ42 cannot serve as a source for secreted Aβ. These results are consistent with a previous report that insoluble Aβ42 accumulates intracellularly with age in NT2N cells, a neuronal-like cell line (12). Aβ1–42, and more abundantly Aβx-42, were found in detergent-insoluble (Fig. 4d, lanes 3 and 4) but not detergent-soluble (Fig. 4d, lanes 1 and 2) extracts of TGN. Both Aβ1–42 and Aβx-42 also were found in vesicles derived from the TGN (Fig. 4d, lanes 5 and 6). The intracellular sites of Aβ1-x generation were similar to those of Aβ1–40 generation (data not shown). Thus, detectable levels of Aβ1-x were neither generated within ER membranes (either soluble or insoluble fractions) nor within vesicles derived from ER membranes. However, Aβ1-x of 4 kDa were detected in both soluble and insoluble extracts of TGN and in vesicles derived from the TGN.

A schematic diagram of βAPP metabolism that can account for recent relevant literature, plus the data derived from the immunofluorescence, sucrose gradient fractionation, and cell-free reconstitution studies, is shown in Fig. 5. It was demonstrated in the present investigation that Aβ1–40 and Aβx-40 are generated within the TGN and packaged into post-TGN secretory vesicles. In conjunction with our earlier findings (15, 17) and evidence from other laboratories (9, 16), these current studies suggest that the TGN is the major, if not exclusive, intracellular compartment within which the 40-specific γ-secretase is active. In addition, we confirmed that a population of insoluble Aβx-42 is generated within the ER and cannot be secreted. Thus, the source of the constitutively secreted population of Aβ42, which is believed to be deposited as extracellular insoluble amyloid plaques, must reside elsewhere. The present results indicate that both Aβx-42 and Aβ1–42 are formed within the TGN, and that these peptides, combined with TGN-generated Aβx-40 and Aβ1–40, constitute the major reservoir of peptides from which the constitutively secreted pool of Aβ is recruited. Cell-free Aβ generation assays may provide an opportunity to delineate the contributions of intracellular insoluble peptides versus secreted soluble peptides to amyloid plaque formation.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Proposed sites of Aβ generation in the secretory pathway. When βAPP is translocated into the lumen of the ER, an N-terminally truncated Aβ42 is formed by the actions of both a β-like secretase (s) and γ42-secretase. This Aβ42 remains in the ER in an insoluble state whereas uncleaved βAPP molecules are packaged into post-ER vesicles and travel through the Golgi apparatus (GA) to the TGN where most of them reside. Both β- and β-like secretases together with γ40- and γ42-secretases cleave βAPP within the TGN. Detergent-insoluble Aβ molecules aggregate and remain within the TGN. Full-length βAPP, β-CTFs, and soluble Aβ are packaged into post-TGN secretory vesicles. Full-length βAPP can be proteolyzed by α-secretase late within the secretory pathway/cell surface to release sβAPPα. Some uncleaved βAPP molecules as well as C-terminal fragments can be internalized via a clathrin-coated endocytic pathway to the endosome or lysosome where βAPP processing enzymes also might occur. A recently characterized pathway (23) could deliver those molecules to the TGN for an additional round of Aβ generation.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Ching-Hwa Sung for technical advice on immunofluorescence studies. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health/National Institute on Aging Grant AG09464, and an Alzheimer Association Grant (G.K.G.).

ABBREVIATIONS

β-amyloid peptides

βAPP

β-amyloid precursor protein

TGN

trans-Golgi network

ER

endoplasmic reticulum

AD

Alzheimer’s disease

PS

presenilin

BIP

ER-restricted binding protein

References

  • 1.Goate A, Chartier-Harlin M, Mullan M, Brown J, Crawford F, Fidani L, Giuffra L, Haynes A, Irving N, James L, et al. Nature (London) 1991;349:704–706. doi: 10.1038/349704a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Murrell J, Farlow M, Ghetti B, Benson M D. Science. 1991;254:97–99. doi: 10.1126/science.1925564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sherrington R, Rogaev E, Liang Y, Rogaeva E, Levesque G, Ikeda M, Chi H, Lin C, Li G, Holman K, et al. Nature (London) 1995;375:754–760. doi: 10.1038/376775a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Levy-Lahad E, Wasco W, Poorkaj P, Romano D, Oshima J, Pettingel W H, Yu C-E, Jondro P D, Schmidt S D, Wang K, et al. Science. 1995;269:973–977. doi: 10.1126/science.7638622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Duff K, Eckman C, Zehr C, Yu X, Prada C, Perez-tur J, Hutton M, Buee L, Harigaya Y, Yager D, et al. Nature (London) 1996;383:710–713. doi: 10.1038/383710a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Scheuner D, Eckman C, Jensen M, Song X, Citron M, Suzuki N, Bird T, Hardy J, Hutton M, Kukull W, et al. Nat Med. 1996;2:864–870. doi: 10.1038/nm0896-864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pike C J, Overman M J, Cotman C W. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:23895–23898. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.41.23895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Greenfield J P, Gouras G K, Xu H. Front Biosci. 1998;3:399–407. doi: 10.2741/a283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hartmann T, Bieger S C, Bruhl B, Tienari P J, Ida N, Allsop D, Roberts G W, Masters C L, Dotti C G, Unsicker K, Beyreuther K. Nat Med. 1997;3:1016–1020. doi: 10.1038/nm0997-1016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cook D G, Forman M S, Sung J C, Leight S, Kolson D L, Iwatsubo T, Lee V M, Doms R W. Nat Med. 1997;3:1021–1023. doi: 10.1038/nm0997-1021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wild-Bode C, Yamazaki T, Capell A, Leimer U, Steiner H, Ihara Y, Haass C. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:16085–16088. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.26.16085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Skovronsky D M, Doms R W, Lee V M. J Cell Biol. 1998;141:1031–1039. doi: 10.1083/jcb.141.4.1031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lippincotz-Schwart J, Cole N B, Donaldson J G. Histochem Cell Biol. 1998;109:449–462. doi: 10.1007/s004180050247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Drecktrah D, Figueiredo P, Mason R M, Brown W J. J Cell Sci. 1998;111:951–965. doi: 10.1242/jcs.111.7.951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Xu H, Shields D. J Cell Biol. 1993;122:1169–1184. doi: 10.1083/jcb.122.6.1169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Thinakaran G, Teplow D S, Siman R, Greenberg B, Sisodia S S. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:9390–9397. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.16.9390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Xu H, Sweeney D, Wang R, Thinakaran G, Lo A, Sisodia S S, Greengard P, Gandy S. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:3748–3752. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.8.3748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Beckers C J M, Balch W E. J Cell Biol. 1989;108:1245–1256. doi: 10.1083/jcb.108.4.1245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gouras G K, Xu H, Jovanovic J N, Buxbaum J D, Wang R, Greengard P, Relkin N R, Gandy S. J Neurochem. 1998;71:1920–1925. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1998.71051920.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Barelli H, Lebeau A, Vizzavona J, Delaere P, Chevallier N, Drouot C, Marambaud P, Ancolio K, Buxbaum J D, Khorkova O, et al. Mol Med. 1997;3:695–707. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Haass C, Koo E, Mellon A, Hung A, Selkoe D. Nature (London) 1992;357:3116–3123. doi: 10.1038/357500a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Koo E, Squazzo S L. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:17386–17389. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ghosh R, Mallet W G, Soe T T, McGraw T E, Maxfield F R. J Cell Biol. 1998;142:923–936. doi: 10.1083/jcb.142.4.923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.DeCurtis I, Simons K. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1988;85:8052–8056. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.21.8052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES