Skip to main content
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 2003 Apr;71(4):2292–2295. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.4.2292-2295.2003

The Fibronectin-Binding Proteins of Staphylococcus aureus May Promote Mammary Gland Colonization in a Lactating Mouse Model of Mastitis

Eric Brouillette 1, Brian G Talbot 1, François Malouin 1,*
PMCID: PMC152093  PMID: 12654860

Abstract

The fibronectin-binding proteins (FnBPs) of Staphylococcus aureus are believed to be implicated in the pathogen's adherence to and colonization of bovine mammary glands, thus leading to infectious mastitis. In vitro studies have shown that FnBPs help the adhesion of the pathogen to bovine mammary epithelial cells. However, the importance of FnBPs for the infection of mammary glands has never been directly established in vivo. In this study with a mouse model of mastitis, the presence of FnBPs on the surface of S. aureus increased the capacity of the bacterium to colonize mammary glands under suckling pressure compared to that of a mutant lacking FnBPs.


The most costly disease in the dairy industry, bovine mastitis, is characterized by inflammation of the mammary gland. This inflammation is frequently caused by a microbial infection. Streptococcus spp., primarily Streptococcus agalactiae, coagulase-negative staphylococci, and Staphylococcus aureus may account for more than 75% of intramammary infections (30). Nearly 19% of these infections are caused by S. aureus (30), and this bacterium causes the mastitis cases that are the most difficult to cure (7). This pathogen possesses specific adhesins that can bind a diversity of host proteins mainly in the host extracellular matrix, such as collagen, fibrinogen, and fibronectin (5, 18). The fibronectin-binding proteins A and B (FnBP-A and FnBP-B), encoded by the fnbA and fnbB loci, respectively, were identified as the main adhesins that bind purified fibronectin (10, 24). At least one of the FnBP genes is found in the vast majority of S. aureus strains (25). Pathogen adherence to the teat canal of the udder is believed to be the first step of mammary gland infection, and FnBPs have been proposed as virulence factors in bovine mastitis (27). To date, there is no direct evidence concerning the importance of FnBPs in the colonization of the mammary gland.

Various studies have reported the role of FnBPs in bacterial adherence to eukaryotic cells in vitro (28), to ex vivo biomaterials (6, 29), and to airway epithelia in a xenograft model (17). As reviewed and noted elsewhere (9), the role of FnBPs as virulence factors has never been clearly demonstrated in an in vivo model of infection. In a rat model of endocarditis, transposon mutagenesis mutants impaired in their ability to adhere to fibronectin showed a reduction in the colonization of heart valves (11). The importance of FnBPs in endocarditis has been questioned, however, by another study in which no difference was detected in the virulence of an isogenic mutant of S. aureus 8325-4 that lacked FnBPs (4). In the same infection model, the poorly pathogenic bacterium Lactococcus lactis was found to cause more severe endocarditis when expressing S. aureus FnBP-A (21). Despite such a result, it remains unclear whether other S. aureus adhesins may compensate in vivo for the absence of FnBPs. Surprisingly, a recent study showed that the absence of FnBPs accentuated the virulence of S. aureus in a rat model of pneumonia (16).

In regard to bovine mastitis, the significance of FnBPs in the disease is unknown but in vitro results suggest a role for these adhesins in the colonization of the mammary gland. For example, S. aureus strains isolated from animals with clinical mastitis adhered, in a strain-dependent manner, to primary cultures of bovine mammary epithelial cells (8). By using a well-defined strain of bacteria and a well-defined cell lineage, an isogenic mutant lacking FnBPs was shown to have a 40% decrease in the capacity to adhere to the MAC-T bovine mammary gland epithelial cell line compared to the wild-type laboratory strain S. aureus 8325-4 (3). Moreover, using the same wild-type strain, its isogenic FnBP mutant, and a flow chamber recreating the physiological shear stress found in blood vessels, Reddy and Ross showed that the FnBPs help the adherence of S. aureus to bovine aortic endothelial cells under flow (22). The higher capacity of S. aureus 8325-4 than that of the mutant lacking FnBPs to adhere to and stay on the cells under flow was observed only when the buffer circulation was stopped for 30 min to allow bacteria to settle before restarting the flow. Under continuous circulation of buffer, no adherence was observed for either of the two strains. Similarly, the flow of milk is not continuous during lactation, thus potentially giving the bacteria the opportunity to adhere between milkings.

In addition to the shear stress caused by suckling or milking, the presence of milk and serum proteins in vivo may represent additional factors influencing the expression of virulence genes and bacterial adherence to the mammary gland. For example, clinical strains of S. aureus isolated from animals with mastitis were shown to adhere more efficiently to mammary gland epithelial cells in vitro when grown in a medium composed of milk whey instead of tryptic soy broth (TSB) (8, 14). However, growth in human ex vivo peritoneal dialysate reduced the fibronectin-binding capacity of S. aureus (15), suggesting that different in vivo growth environments may have different consequences for adherence. It should be noted that inflammation of the mammary gland increases the serum protein content in cow milk. Recently, S. aureus genes which are specifically expressed during growth in milk or serum were identified (12, 31). Even if valuable data can be obtained from adherence studies performed in vitro, it is clear that these observations should be taken with care when extrapolated to apply to the in vivo context (28). Consequently, there is a need to study adherence in animal models that represent the disease under investigation.

A mouse model of mastitis was used in the present work to directly evaluate the importance of S. aureus FnBPs for colonization and infection of the mammary gland during lactation. The bacteria used here are the laboratory strain S. aureus 8325-4 and an isogenic strain with mutations in the fnbA and fnbB genes, S. aureus DU5883 (6). Numerous in vitro and in vivo studies have used these strains to evaluate the role of S. aureus FnBPs (3, 4, 6, 13, 16, 17, 20, 22), and in our study, similar to what has previously been shown (3), S. aureus DU5883 demonstrated a 30% reduction in the ability to adhere to cultured MAC-T bovine mammary epithelial cells compared to the wild-type 8325-4 strain (data not shown). The inactivation of S. aureus DU5883 fnb genes was achieved by the insertion of genes for resistance to erythromycin and tetracycline, and the present study took advantage of such genetic markers to selectively identify, on agar plates, tetracycline-resistant bacteria present in mixtures containing both 8325-4 and DU5883 strains. The bacteria used for infection were prepared by using overnight cultures diluted 1:50 in fresh TSB medium and incubated for another 2 h at 35°C to reach the exponential growth phase and thus maximum FnBP expression (23). The cells were then centrifuged at 3,000 × g for 10 min, washed twice, and suspended in cold endotoxin-free phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Both suspensions of S. aureus (8325-4 and DU5883) were adjusted to exactly the same optical densities. The two S. aureus suspensions were then mixed in equal proportions and diluted to the desired number of CFU per milliliter. By using this procedure, it was possible to get mixtures of bacteria with proportions that did not differ by more than 1.6% between the strains. To evaluate the number of CFU per milliliter and the relative percentage of S. aureus DU5883 bacteria, mixtures of bacterial suspensions were serially diluted and plated onto tryptic soy agar medium, with or without 1 μg of tetracycline/ml. The percentage of S. aureus DU5883 bacteria has been calculated by dividing the number of CFU from the plates with tetracycline by the number of CFU from the plates without antibiotic and multiplying the result by 100. When a half-and-half mixture of S. aureus 8325-4 and DU5883 was incubated and grown in TSB, the proportions of both strains remained the same for all phases of the growth curve (data not shown).

Intramammary inoculation was carried out as described by Chandler (2), with some modifications. Briefly, the 13- to 14-day-old pups were removed from lactating CD1 mice (Charles River, St.-Constant, Canada) 1 h before inoculation. The lactating mice were anesthetized by using ketamine and xylazine at 87 and 13 mg/kg of body weight, respectively, and buprenorphine at 0.075 mg/kg as an analgesic. Using a 100-μl glass syringe and a 33-gauge blunt needle, the mammary glands (fourth on the right [R4] and fourth on the left [L4]) were inoculated with 100 μl of bacterial suspension containing equal amounts of S. aureus 8325-4 and DU5883. To allow precise injection into the mammary ducts, the near ends of the teats were aseptically removed before inoculation. Immediately after the injection, the R4 glands were ligatured and referred to as the nonsuckled glands while the L4 glands were allowed to be suckled. The lactating mice were then kept alone for 1 h and 30 min before the return of the pups to allow suckling of the L4 glands. After 20 h of infection, the R4 and L4 mammary glands of each mouse were aseptically removed, weighed, and homogenized in PBS at a final volume of 3 ml. Homogenates diluted 1/10 in PBS containing 20% glycerol were kept at −80°C until used for counting of CFU. To evaluate the CFU content and the proportion of S. aureus DU5883 bacteria, the homogenates were plated onto tryptic soy agar with and without tetracycline as described above. The guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care were respected during all the procedures (19).

Experiments were carried out to evaluate the number of CFU required for a moderate infection in both suckled (L4) and nonsuckled (R4) glands. Four different mixed inocula containing from 101 to 104 CFU were used for intramammary infection of three or four lactating mice per group. Table 1 shows the weights of glands recorded 20 h after inoculation with S. aureus. For the three smaller bacterial inoculum amounts, the difference between the average weights of suckled and nonsuckled glands clearly indicated that milk was indeed removed from the suckled glands since the L4 glands weighed approximately 50% less than the R4 glands. A 50% weight difference between suckled and nonsuckled glands was also previously reported for the Compton White lactating mouse strain (1). We however observed a smaller weight difference when a very large inoculum amount was used (Table 1). In regard to the resulting infection of the glands, Table 1 reports the logarithms of total numbers of CFU obtained according to the inoculum administrated. Similar counts were obtained in all the R4 (or L4) glands despite the wide range in the numbers of CFU injected. In fact, the counts reached their maximum levels at 20 h in both R4 and L4 glands when an inoculum of at least 4.5 × 102 CFU/gland was used. Likewise, maximum bacterial counts were observed at 24 h of infection with similar amounts (1 × 102 to 4 × 102 CFU/gland) of inoculum containing the S. aureus strain Newbould 305, originally isolated from a clinical case of bovine mastitis (E. Brouillette, B. G. Talbot, G. Grondin, and F. Malouin, Abstr. 102nd Gen. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol. 2002, abstr. Z-56, 2002). The average bacterial counts determined for the R4 and L4 glands were different by more than 2 log (P < 0.001), indicating that suckling contributes to a reduction in colonization. Also shown in Table 1, and of greater interest, the percentages of S. aureus DU5883 bacteria found in the L4 gland homogenates for all inocula were significantly different from those found in the R4 gland homogenates (nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test; P < 0.05). In other terms, S. aureus DU5883 bacteria lacking FnBPs were present in a lower proportion, as determined by the amount of DU5883 bacteria relative to the total amount of DU5883 and 8325-4 bacteria, under suckling pressure (L4 glands; 28.9%) than in the absence of suckling pressure (R4 glands; 41.2%).

TABLE 1.

Characteristics of mouse mammary glands and CFU counts resulting from different inocula of S. aureus 8325-4 (with FnBPs) and DU5883 (without FnBPs) bacteria mixed in equal proportions, with or without suckling pressure, after 20 h of infection

Inoculum (CFU) Nonsuckled glands (R4)
Suckled glands (L4)
No. of glands Avg no. of CFU (log) Avg wt (g) % DU5883 bacteria No. of glands Avg no. of CFU (log) Avg wt (g) % DU5883 bacteria
4.5 × 101 3 6.2 0.98 29.0 4 5.0 0.45 22.7
4.5 × 102 3 7.2 0.84 48.1 4 4.7 0.36 35.8
4.5 × 103 3 7.2 0.80 34.2 4 4.6 0.36 33.4
4.5 × 104 3 6.8 0.86 44.3 3 4.9 0.61 22.0
Combined resultsa 12 6.9 (1.0)b 0.87 (0.17)b 41.2 (33.8 and 44.4)c 15 4.8 (0.8)b 0.43 (0.2)b 28.9 (20.0 and 35.4)c
a

Individual data for all R4 or L4 glands were grouped.

b

Average (standard deviation); P < 0.001; Student t test.

c

Median (lower and upper quartiles); P < 0.05; Mann-Whitney U test

To confirm the observation that S. aureus DU5883 bacteria were present in a lower proportion when the glands were suckled, 15 CD1 lactating mice were then experimentally infected with a unique inoculum (6.4 × 102 CFU/gland) composed of equal amounts of S. aureus 8325-4 and DU5883 bacteria. As for the experiment results reported in Table 1, the differences in the weights and the base-10 logarithms of CFU counts for the L4 and R4 glands were found to be statistically significant by using the Student t test (P is <0.001 and <0.01, respectively) (data not shown). The percentage of DU5883 bacteria found in the mammary tissues also confirmed the diminished ability of the mutant lacking FnBPs to colonize the glands under suckling pressure (Fig. 1). More precisely, the percentage of DU5883 bacteria in the initial inoculum (49.9%) was reduced to 34.6% in the glands when they were suckled (L4) (Fig. 1A). By using a Mann-Whitney U test, this percentage was found to be statistically different from the value of 45.3% found for the nonsuckled glands (R4) (P < 0.02). Therefore, the presence of FnBPs at the surface of the wild-type 8325-4 strain increased the pathogen's capacity to colonize the gland when the offspring were suckling. By plotting the percentage of DU5883 bacteria present in the L4 and R4 glands for each mouse, the collective significant difference between the suckled and nonsuckled glands can be put in perspective (Fig. 1B). In fact, only a few mice did displayed no marked difference in the amounts of the FnBP-lacking bacteria represented in the R4 and L4 glands and, for others, the difference in favor of the wild-type S. aureus strain 8325-4 reached 30 to 35%. A factor that may explain the observed differences between mice may be that the number of pups was different for each mouse, i.e., from 8 to 12. Thus, even if the weight of all 15 individual L4 glands showed suckling by comparison to the R4 glands (data not shown), the turnover volume of milk could individually vary and so could the overall suckling-induced flow.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Percentages of S. aureus DU5883 bacteria present in infected mammary glands. Mammary glands of CD1 lactating mice were inoculated with a half-and-half mixture of S. aureus 8325-4 bacteria (with FnBPs) and S. aureus DU5883 bacteria (without FnBPs) at 6.4 × 102 CFU/gland. The percentages for individual glands are represented by circles. (A) Glands were grouped as suckled and nonsuckled. The medians (indicated values) and the first and third quartiles are represented by bars. By using the Mann-Whitney U test, the difference in the percentages of S. aureus DU5883 bacteria in L4 and R4 glands was found to be statistically significant (P < 0.02). (B) For each mouse, results for the suckled and nonsuckled glands are paired to allow comparison of the proportions of S. aureus DU5883 bacteria found within each animal. The bold line indicates the percentage of DU5883 bacteria in the initial inoculum.

Using a lactating mouse model of mastitis, this report demonstrates that the FnBPs of S. aureus confer a selective advantage to the bacterium in vivo. The results show for the first time that S. aureus FnBPs are virulence factors for the colonization of the mammary gland under milk flow. It is reasonable to suggest that adherence to the mammary gland cells conferred by FnBPs prevents S. aureus from washing out during suckling. As opposed to in vitro adherence studies, the lactating mouse model of mastitis supplies conditions that better represent the natural environment found during an infection (presence of serum and milk), incorporates physical factors such as suckling, and takes into account the complexity of inflammation and immune reactions that occur during infectious mastitis. In the future, the mouse mammary gland and its model of infection may also allow the use of recently developed microbiological tools (26), such as in vivo bioluminescence, signature-tagged mutagenesis, and DNA microarrays, to study bacterial gene expression in a context relevant to the infectious mastitis disease.

Acknowledgments

This study was partly supported by grant 89758-01 from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada to F.M.

We thank Lulzim Shkreta for performing the in vitro adherence assays.

Editor: B. B. Finlay

REFERENCES

  • 1.Anderson, J. C. 1981. The effect of suckling on the course of experimental staphylococcal mastitis in the mouse. Br. Vet. J. 137:489-500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chandler, R. L. 1970. Experimental bacterial mastitis in the mouse. J. Med. Microbiol. 3:273-282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dziewanowska, K., J. M. Patti, C. F. Deobald, K. W. Bayles, W. R. Trumble, and G. A. Bohach. 1999. Fibronectin binding protein and host cell tyrosine kinase are required for internalization of Staphylococcus aureus by epithelial cells. Infect. Immun. 67:4673-4678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Flock, J. I., S. A. Hienz, A. Heimdahl, and T. Schennings. 1996. Reconsideration of the role of fibronectin binding in endocarditis caused by Staphylococcus aureus. Infect. Immun. 64:1876-1878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Foster, T. J., and M. Hook. 1998. Surface protein adhesins of Staphylococcus aureus. Trends Microbiol. 6:484-488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Greene, C., D. McDevitt, P. Francois, P. E. Vaudaux, D. P. Lew, and T. J. Foster. 1995. Adhesion properties of mutants of Staphylococcus aureus defective in fibronectin-binding proteins and studies on the expression of fnb genes. Mol. Microbiol. 17:1143-1152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gruet, P., P. Maincent, X. Berthelot, and V. Kaltsatos. 2001. Bovine mastitis and intramammary drug delivery: review and perspectives. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 50:245-259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hensen, S. M., M. J. Pavicic, J. A. Lohuis, and B. Poutrel. 2000. Use of bovine primary mammary epithelial cells for the comparison of adherence and invasion ability of Staphylococcus aureus strains. J. Dairy Sci. 83:418-429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Joh, D., E. R. Wann, B. Kreikemeyer, P. Speziale, and M. Hook. 1999. Role of fibronectin-binding MSCRAMMs in bacterial adherence and entry into mammalian cells. Matrix Biol. 18:211-223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jonsson, K., C. Signas, H. P. Muller, and M. Lindberg. 1991. Two different genes encode fibronectin binding proteins in Staphylococcus aureus. The complete nucleotide sequence and characterization of the second gene. Eur. J. Biochem. 202:1041-1048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kuypers, J. M., and R. A. Proctor. 1989. Reduced adherence to traumatized rat heart valves by a low-fibronectin-binding mutant of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect. Immun. 57:2306-2312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lammers, A., E. Kruijt, C. van de Kuijt, P. J. Nuijten, and H. E. Smith. 2000. Identification of Staphylococcus aureus genes expressed during growth in milk: a useful model for selection of genes important in bovine mastitis? Microbiology 146:981-987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lammers, A., P. J. Nuijten, and H. E. Smith. 1999. The fibronectin binding proteins of Staphylococcus aureus are required for adhesion to and invasion of bovine mammary gland cells. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 180:103-109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mamo, W., and G. Froman. 1994. Adhesion of Staphylococcus aureus to bovine mammary epithelial cells induced by growth in milk whey. Microbiol. Immunol. 38:305-308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Massey, R. C., S. R. Dissanayeke, B. Cameron, D. Ferguson, T. J. Foster, and S. J. Peacock. 2002. Functional blocking of Staphylococcus aureus adhesins following growth in ex vivo media. Infect. Immun. 70:5339-5345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.McElroy, M. C., D. J. Cain, C. Tyrrell, T. J. Foster, and C. Haslett. 2002. Increased virulence of a fibronectin-binding protein mutant of Staphylococcus aureus in a rat model of pneumonia. Infect. Immun. 70:3865-3873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mongodin, E., O. Bajolet, J. Cutrona, N. Bonnet, F. Dupuit, E. Puchelle, and S. de Bentzmann. 2002. Fibronectin-binding proteins of Staphylococcus aureus are involved in adherence to human airway epithelium. Infect. Immun. 70:620-630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Novick, R. P. 2000. Pathogenicity factors and their regulation, p. 392-407. In V. A. Fischetti, R. P. Novick, J. J. Ferretti, D. A. Portnoy, and J. I. Rood (ed.), Gram-positive pathogens. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
  • 19.Olfert, E. D., B. M. Cross, and A. McWilliam (ed.). 1993. Guide to the care and use of experimental animals, 2nd ed., vol. 1. Canadian Council on Animal Care, Ontario, Canada.
  • 20.Peacock, S. J., T. J. Foster, B. J. Cameron, and A. R. Berendt. 1999. Bacterial fibronectin-binding proteins and endothelial cell surface fibronectin mediate adherence of Staphylococcus aureus to resting human endothelial cells. Microbiology 145:3477-3486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Que, Y. A., P. Francois, J. A. Haefliger, J. M. Entenza, P. Vaudaux, and P. Moreillon. 2001. Reassessing the role of Staphylococcus aureus clumping factor and fibronectin-binding protein by expression in Lactococcus lactis. Infect. Immun. 69:6296-6302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Reddy, K., and J. M. Ross. 2001. Shear stress prevents fibronectin binding protein-mediated Staphylococcus aureus adhesion to resting endothelial cells. Infect. Immun. 69:3472-3475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Saravia-Otten, P., H. P. Muller, and S. Arvidson. 1997. Transcription of Staphylococcus aureus fibronectin binding protein genes is negatively regulated by agr and an agr-independent mechanism. J. Bacteriol. 179:5259-5263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Signas, C., G. Raucci, K. Jonsson, P. E. Lindgren, G. M. Anantharamaiah, M. Hook, and M. Lindberg. 1989. Nucleotide sequence of the gene for a fibronectin-binding protein from Staphylococcus aureus: use of this peptide sequence in the synthesis of biologically active peptides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:699-703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Smeltzer, M. S., A. F. Gillaspy, F. L. J. Pratt, M. D. Thames, and J. J. Iandolo. 1997. Prevalence and chromosomal map location of Staphylococcus aureus adhesin genes. Gene 196:249-259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Smith, H. 2000. State and future of studies on bacterial pathogenicity: impact of new methods of studying bacterial behavior in vivo, p. 265-282. In K. A. Brogden, J. A. Roth, T. B. Stanton, C. A. Bolin, F. C. Minion, and M. J. Wannemuehler (ed.), Virulence mechanisms of bacterial pathogens. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
  • 27.Sutra, L., and B. Poutrel. 1994. Virulence factors involved in the pathogenesis of bovine intramammary infections due to Staphylococcus aureus. J. Med. Microbiol. 40:79-89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.van Belkum, A., M. Kools-Sijmons, and H. Verbrugh. 2002. Attachment of Staphylococcus aureus to eukaryotic cells and experimental pitfalls in staphylococcal adherence assays: a critical appraisal. J. Microbiol. Methods 48:19-42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Vaudaux, P. E., P. Francois, R. A. Proctor, D. McDevitt, T. J. Foster, R. M. Albrecht, D. P. Lew, H. Wabers, and S. L. Cooper. 1995. Use of adhesion-defective mutants of Staphylococcus aureus to define the role of specific plasma proteins in promoting bacterial adhesion to canine arteriovenous shunts. Infect. Immun. 63:585-590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wilson, D. J., R. N. Gonzalez, and H. H. Das. 1997. Bovine mastitis pathogens in New York and Pennsylvania: prevalence and effects on somatic cell count and milk production. J. Dairy Sci. 80:2592-2598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wiltshire, M. D., and S. J. Foster. 2001. Identification and analysis of Staphylococcus aureus components expressed by a model system of growth in serum. Infect. Immun. 69:5198-5202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES