Abstract
There is a great tendency in recent years to seek psychiatric answers to well-nigh all kinds of child problems. This tendency is seriously questioned. The average child has splendid capacities to solve his own growth problems, within the limits of home, school, neighborhood. Evidence accumulates that the average parent who seeks counsel has done a rather respectable job; that in his fear of setting limits because of “how the child will feel,” there is more of psychological threat to the child than in daring to comfortably move ahead and make some mistakes.
Psychiatric treatment of a child implies that the child is unable to meet situations as adequately as other children. Such treatment should be reserved, in the main, for use in situations in which the psychiatrist and parents are willing to underwrite the implications of treatment. Treatment aimed at the vague goal of making the child “happier” is dubious. Treatment by a psychiatrist is presumably medical treatment and carries with it the advantages and disadvantages inherent in this fact. When given without carefully defining the reasons for it and the goals at which it is aimed, within medical framework, it is potentially an undesirable procedure.
Full text
PDF
