Abstract
The presence and nucleotide sequences of the two mecA repressors, mecI and blaI, were assessed in 73 clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Isolates with mecI mutations were grouped into unique clonal types based on their spa nucleotide repeat patterns. Forty-three of the 45 (96%) isolates with mutant mecI or with a deletion of mecI contained blaI, while blaI was present in only 21 of 28 (78%) isolates with wild-type mecI (P < 0.05). Among 22 additional isolates that did not contain blaI, all had wild-type mecI sequences. We conclude that oxacillin-resistant S. aureus must have at least one of the two functional mecA regulators.
Transcription of mecA, the gene mediating oxacillin resistance in staphylococci, is regulated by a repressor, mecI, that is divergently transcribed from mecA as the second gene in a two-gene operon that also includes mecR1 (1, 11, 21). More than 90% of staphylococcal isolates also produce β-lactamase, the product of blaZ, and contain blaZ regulatory sequences (blaI and blaR1) that are similar in sequence and function to mecA regulators (9, 10). In addition to regulating blaZ transcription, BlaI also binds to mecA-mecR1 promoter-operator (P-O) sequences and regulates their transcription (9, 13, 14, 19). Coregulation of mecA by both MecI and BlaI has been demonstrated in defined laboratory strains (14), but neither the presence nor the nucleotide sequences of the two coregulators have been investigated in clinical isolates.
Mutations and deletions in mecI and deletions of both mecI and mecR1 appear to be common in clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates (1, 12, 16, 21, 22). In contrast, while there has been no systematic assessment of blaI and blaR1 in clinical isolates, these regulators have been found to be intact in sequence or function whenever they have been examined. To explore the extent of MecI and BlaI coregulation of mecA, we examined a collection of geographically and temporally diverse oxacillin-resistant S. aureus isolates, most of which were also shown to have genetic diversity. We also correlated the clonal type with regulator sequence by using the number of unique nucleotide repeat sequences in the protein A (spa) gene as a typing tool as previously described (20).
Source of isolates.
The oxacillin-resistant S. aureus isolates examined in this study came from three sources. The first source was the Public Health Research Institute (PHRI) collection, from which 40 isolates were chosen. These isolates were selected because 37 of the 40 isolates had different spa repeat patterns (20), indicating clonal diversity. They were of unknown mecI status, came from five different countries and 19 cities, and were isolated between 1960 and 1997. The second source was the Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) collection, from which 33 isolates were chosen. These isolates had been previously shown to have sequences that hybridized with a mecI probe (1) and were recovered from patients in 25 different cities in four countries between 1968 and 1993. The final source was the SCOPE collection (6), from which 208 oxacillin-resistant S. aureus isolates were examined for β-lactamase production. These isolates were recovered from the blood of patients in 38 contributing hospitals in the United States between 1997 and 2000. All isolates were identified as S. aureus by standard criteria and were shown to have the mecA gene by PCR amplification of genomic DNA.
Identification and characterization of repressors.
Chromosomal DNA was prepared by using a Qiagen (Chatsworth, Calif.) genomic DNA preparation kit according to the manufacturer's directions. PCR amplification of DNA sequences was performed to confirm the presence of mecA, mecI, mecA-mecR1 P-O sequences, blaZ, and blaI by use of the corresponding primers shown in Table 1. A Qiagen Taq PCR master mix kit was used in the amplification reaction, and the recommended thermocycling conditions were achieved according to the manufacturer's directions. The sequences of mecI, blaI, and mecA P-O from different S. aureus isolates were determined from specific amplified PCR products, and sequence analysis was performed by using the automated laser fluorescence technique employing fluorescein-labeled oligonucleotides (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.). Sequencher DNA sequencing analysis software (Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, Mich.) was used to compare sequences for each isolate with the database sequences for these genes from S. aureus N315 and the β-lactamase plasmid pI258. The production of β-lactamase was assessed with nitrocefin disks (Becton Dickinson, Cockeysville, Md.) according to the manufacturer's instructions and as previously described (4).
TABLE 1.
Primers used in this study
Gene and primer | Nucleotide sequence | |
---|---|---|
mecA | ||
566 | 5′-TCATAGCGTCATTATTCC-3′ | |
570 | 5′-ATCACTTGGTATATCTTCACC-3′ | |
mecA-mecRI P-O
|
||
234 | 5′-CCAAACCCGACAACTAC-3′ | |
247 | 5′-CGTGTCAGATACATTTCG-3′ | |
mecI | ||
205 | 5′-CCGGAATTCGCATATGGATTTCAC-3′ | |
251 | 5′-GATGGTTCGTAGGTTATGTTG-3′ | |
214 | 5′-CGGATCCGAAATGGAATTAATATAATG-3′ | |
215 | 5′-CGGAATTCGACTTGATTGTTTCCT-3′ | |
blaZ | ||
048 | 5′-TCAAACAGTTCACATGCC-3′ | |
049 | 5′-TTCATTACACTCTGGCG-3′ | |
blaI | ||
422 | 5′-CCCAATGGGTGTTTTAAATGGCCAA-3′ | |
453 | 5′-AATGGTTATTTTCTGTACACTCT-3′ |
The mecI gene was detected in 56 of the 73 VCU and PHRI isolates (77%) by hybridization and subsequent PCR amplification. The other 17 isolates contained the identical deletion of mecI and the 3′ 783 nucleotides of mecR1, with insertion of a truncated copy of IS1272, as has been previously described (1, 2). Examination of the nucleotide sequences of the mecI PCR products showed that 27 of the 56 isolates (48%) contained the wild-type gene, identical to sequences shown to provide maximal repression of mecA transcription (14, 19). The other 29 isolates had genetic alterations in mecI. In addition, the mecA-mecR1 intergenic region, containing the mecA and mecR1 promoters as well as the MecI binding site, was PCR amplified in all 56 isolates having mecI; all sequences were identical to wild type.
β-lactamase was produced by 64 of the 73 VCU and PHRI isolates, and all of these 64 isolates also had PCR products amplified by blaZ- and blaI-specific primers. None of the nine β-lactamase-negative isolates had sequences that could be amplified by blaI primers. The blaI nucleotide sequence was determined for all isolates having a mecI mutation or deletion (45 isolates). For all but two of these isolates, the blaI sequences were the same as those published previously or in the database. Seven of the nine isolates with no blaI contained mecI with wild-type sequence. Twenty-two of the 208 (11%) oxacillin-resistant S. aureus isolates from the SCOPE collection were β-lactamase- and blaI-negative, and each of the 22 contained wild-type mecI.
The genetic alterations in mecI were nonsense (13 isolates), frameshift (4 isolates), or missense (11 isolates) mutations. The nonsense and frameshift mutations introduced translational stop codons into the sequence at positions that were predicted to truncate the protein, rendering it inactive. The effect of missense mutations on repressor function could not be reliably predicted from examination of the predicted amino acid sequence, but in each case the nucleotide change resulted in substitution of an amino acid. Sixteen of the 17 isolates with a deletion of mecI and 27 of the 28 isolates with mecI mutations (43 of 45 isolates in all [98%]) contained blaI with sequence identical to that of published, functional repressors. The mecI mutation in the single isolate of this group that was blaI negative was a missense mutation (Leu48 → Phe), resulting in a conservative substitution. In contrast, only 21 of 28 (75%) isolates with intact mecI contained blaI (43 of 45 versus 21 of 28; P < 0.05, Fisher's exact test) (Table 2). Thus, among 281 isolates examined in this study, 31 (11%) were β-lactamase and blaI negative, and 29 of these 31 (94%) had wild-type mecI sequences. In contrast, among the 65 β-lactamase-positive isolates in which mecI was examined, only 21 (32%) contained wild-type mecI sequences (P < 0.001, Fisher's exact test).
TABLE 2.
Number of S. aureus isolates containing mecA repressors
mecI genotype | No. (%) of isolates with blaI
|
|
---|---|---|
Present | Absent | |
Mutant (nonsense) | 13 (100) | 0 (0) |
Mutant (frameshift) | 4 (100) | 0 (0) |
Mutant (missense) | 10 (92) | 1 (8) |
Deletion | 16 (94) | 1 (6) |
Wild type | 21 (75) | 7 (25) |
Total | 64 (88) | 9 (12) |
Relationship between repressor content and clonal type.
Some of the isolates with the same spa type were also examined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) of genomic DNA, digested with the restriction enzyme SmaI, and electrophoresed to visualize both large and small restriction fragments, as previously described (7). The isolates with mecI mutations and deletions were clustered into clonal groups, and those with the same mutation were in the same clonal group. As shown in Table 3, 12 isolates had the same mutation at nucleotide 202 (Gln68 → stop) and all 12 had the identical spa pattern. Seven of the 12 isolates containing this nonsense mutation came from different cities and were isolated in different years, and 9 of the 12 had unique PFGE patterns (>3-band difference). Three isolates and two isolates had the same missense mutations (Ala11 → Val and Leu116 → Ser, respectively). The spa types were the same for the latter two isolates and were the same or closely related for the former three. All five of these isolates had unique PFGE types. Thus, the spa and mecI types seem to designate stable clones that have disseminated over time and place while PFGE analysis identifies more recent genetic alterations that reflect local environmental pressures.
TABLE 3.
Clonal distribution of S. aureus isolates relative to mecA repressor genotype
mecI-blaI genotype | No. of isolates | spa type(s) | Related profilea |
---|---|---|---|
mecI mutation (Gln68→stop) | 12 | Type 3 (12 isolates) | WGKAOMQ |
mecI mutation (Glu115→stop) | 1 | Type 16 (1 isolate) | WGKAKAOMQQQ |
mecI mutation (Ala11→Val) | 3 | Type 245 (2 isolates) | YHFMBQBLO |
Type 7 (1 isolate) | YHGCMBQBLO | ||
mecI mutation (Leu116→Ser) | 2 | Type 1 (2 isolates) | YGFMBQBLO |
Different mecI mutations (frameshifts, missense, and deletions) | 27 | Types 1 (3 isolates), 48, 7 (2 isolates), 1, and 4 | YHGFMBQBLO related |
Type 3 | WGKAOMQ | ||
Types 5, 6, 9, 10, 13, 15, 17, 19, 20, 21, 27, 31, 32, 34, 43, and 55 | Unrelated to any other types | ||
Types 2, 14, and 28 | TJMBMDMGMK relatedb | ||
mecI wild type | 28 | Types 2 (13 isolates), 11, 12, 23, 24, 26, 29, and 41 | TJMBMDMGM related |
Type 123 (2 isolates) | WGKKKKAOMc | ||
Types 8, 43, 49, 50, 56, and NEW | Unrelated to any other types |
Related, ≥80% of repeats in the same order; unrelated, ≤20% of repeats in the same order.
Isolates with mutant mecI having spa types found among isolates with wild-type mecI.
Isolates with wild-type mecI having spa types found among isolates with mutant mecI.
Among the 45 isolates containing a mecI mutation or deletion, only 3 had a spa type that was found among the 27 isolates with wild-type mecI; among the 28 with wild-type sequence, only 2 had a type related to those isolates with mutations (Table 3). Thus, spa typing identified unique clonal groups that might be more likely to develop a mutant or deleted mecI. It is possible that the presence of mecI mutations defines oxacillin-resistant S. aureus clones with a mutator phenotype that could result in mutations, deletions, or insertions of other genes that were not sought in this study.
Conclusion.
The retention of functional mecA and blaZ repressors may not be due solely to a need to modulate the quantity of regulated gene products in response to the presence of β-lactam antibiotics in the environment. It has been shown that the expression of oxacillin resistance (high level [homotypic] or low level [heterotypic]) has little correlation with mecA transcription (8, 17, 18). Furthermore, 90% of staphylococci retain blaZ and its regulatory genes despite the narrow substrate specificity of the β-lactamase (5), providing no protection against most of the β-lactam antibiotics that are prevalent in hospitals. Therefore, the retention of β-lactamase and mecA regulatory sequences may be necessary to prevent the deleterious effects on the cell of unregulated protein production. The target of regulation is either PBP 2a or penicillinase, both of which can be produced in large quantities in the absence of induction without any obvious consequences to the cell (3, 15). However, mecR1 and blaR1 are also regulated by mecI and blaI as a consequence of autoregulation of the two-gene operon. Overproduction of mecR1 on an expression vector in the absence of β-lactam induction markedly retards cell growth (A. Rosato, unpublished observations). Both blaZ and mecA encode penicillin-binding proteins, which, like all penicillin-binding proteins, are products of evolution from a common ancestor (11). However, PBP2a and penicillinase are less closely related, by comparison of amino acid sequences, than are their regulators. Thus, it is tempting to speculate that the regulators evolved from an ancestor different from that of at least one of the regulated genes and that, in the case of mecA, regulation has persisted not so much to allow fine modulation of the regulated gene product as to prevent toxic overproduction of one of the proteins.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported in part by Public Health Service grant R37 AI 35705 from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
REFERENCES
- 1.Archer, G. L., D. M. Niemeyer, J. A. Thanassi, and M. J. Pucci. 1994. Dissemination among staphylococci of DNA sequences associated with methicillin resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38:447-454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Archer, G. L., J. A. Thanassi, D. M. Niemeyer, and M. J. Pucci. 1996. Characterization of IS1272, an insertion sequence-like element from Staphylococcus haemolyticus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:924-929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cohen, S., and H. M. Sweeney. 1968. Constitutive penicillinase formation in Staphylococcus aureus owing to a mutation unlinked to the penicillinase plasmid. J. Bacteriol. 93:1368-1374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dickinson, T. M., and G. L. Archer. 2000. Phenotypic expression of oxacillin resistance in Staphylococcus epidermidis: roles of mecA transcriptional regulation and resistant-subpopulation selection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:1616-1623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dyke, K., and P. D. Gregory. 1997. Resistance to β-lactam antibiotics. Resistance mediated by β-lactamase, p. 139-157. In K. B. Crossley and G. L. Archer (ed.), The staphylococci in human disease. Churchill Livingstone, New York, N.Y.
- 6.Edmond, M. B., S. E. Wallace, D. K. McClish, M. A. Pfaller, R. N. Jones, and R. P. Wenzel. 1999. Nosocomial bloodstream infections in United States hospitals: a three-year analysis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 29:239-243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fey, P. D., M. W. Climo, and G. L. Archer. 1998. Determination of the chromosomal relationship between mecA and gyrA in methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:306-312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Finan, J. E., A. E. Rosato, T. M. Dickinson, D. Ko, and G. L. Archer. 2002. Conversion of oxacillin-resistant staphylococci from heterotypic to homotypic resistance expression. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:24-30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gregory, P. D., R. A. Lewis, S. P. Curnock, and K. G. Dyke. 1997. Studies of the repressor (BlaI) of beta-lactamase synthesis in Staphylococcus aureus. Mol. Microbiol. 24:1025-1037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hackbarth, C. J., and H. F. Chambers. 1993. blaI and blaR1 regulate β-lactamase and PBP2′ production in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 37:1144-1149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hiramatsu, K. 1995. Molecular evolution of MRSA. Microbiology 39:531-543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kobayashi, N., K. Taniguchi, and S. Urasawa. 1998. Analysis of diversity of mutations in the mecI gene and mecA promoter/operator region of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:717-720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lewis, R. A., and K. G. Dyke. 2000. mecI represses synthesis from the beta-lactamase operon of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 45:139-144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.McKinney, T. K., V. K. Sharma, W. A. Craig, and G. L. Archer. 2001. Transcription of the gene mediating methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus (mecA) is corepressed but not coinduced by cognate mecA and beta-lactamase regulators. J. Bacteriol. 183:6862-6868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Niemeyer, D. M., M. J. Pucci, J. A. Thanassi, V. K. Sharma, and G. L. Archer. 1996. Role of mecA transcriptional regulation in the phenotypic expression of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 178:5464-5471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Petinaki, E., A. Arvaniti, G. Dimitracopoulos, and I. Spiliopoulou. 2001. Detection of mecA, mecR1 and mecI genes among clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant staphylococci by combined polymerase chain reactions. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 47:297-304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ryffel, C., F. H. Kayser, and B. Berger-Bachi. 1992. Correlation between regulation of mecA transcription and expression of methicillin resistance in staphylococci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 36:25-31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ryffel, C., A. Strassle, F. H. Kayser, and B. Berger-Bachi. 1994. Mechanisms of heteroresistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38:724-728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sharma, V. K., C. J. Hackbarth, and T. M. Dickinson. 1998. Interaction of native and mutant MecI repressors with sequences that regulate mecA, the gene encoding penicillin binding protein 2a in methicillin-resistant staphylococci. J. Bacteriol. 180:2160-2166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Shopsin, B., M. Gomez, S. O. Montgomery, D. H. Smith, M. Waddington, D. E. Dodge, D. A. Bost, M. Riehman, S. Naidich, and B. N. Kreiswirth. 1999. Evaluation of protein A gene polymorphic region DNA sequencing for typing of Staphylococcus aureus strains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:3556-3563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Suzuki, E., K. Kuwahara-Arai, J. F. Richardson, and K. Hiramatsu. 1993. Distribution of mec regulator genes in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus clinical strains. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 37:1219-1226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Weller, T. M. 1999. The distribution of mecA, mecR1 and mecI and sequence analysis of mecI and the mec promoter region in staphylococci expressing resistance to methicillin. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 43:15-22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]