Skip to main content
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 1998 Apr;106(4):217–226. doi: 10.1289/ehp.98106217

Hazard screening of chemical releases and environmental equity analysis of populations proximate to toxic release inventory facilities in Oregon.

C M Neumann 1, D L Forman 1, J E Rothlein 1
PMCID: PMC1532974  PMID: 9494125

Abstract

A comprehensive approach using hazard screening, demographic analysis, and a geographic information system (GIS) for mapping is employed to address environmental equity issues in Oregon. A media-specific chronic toxicity index [or chronic index (CI)] was used to compare environmental chemical releases reported in the EPA's Toxic Chemical Release Inventory (TRI) database. In 1992, 254 facilities reportedly released more than 40 million pounds of toxic chemicals directly into the environment on-site or transferred them to sewage treatment plants or other off-site facilities for disposal and recycling. For each reported on-site TRI chemical release, a CI based on oral toxicity factors and total mass was calculated. CIs were aggregated on a media-, facility-, and chemical-specific basis. Glycol ethers, nickel, trichloroethylene, chloroform, and manganese were ranked as the top five chemicals released statewide based on total CI. In contrast, based on total mass, methanol, nickel, ammonia, acetone, and toluene were identified as the top five TRI chemicals released in Oregon. TRI facility rankings were related to the demographics and household income of surrounding neighborhoods using bivariate GIS mapping and statistical analysis. TRI facilities were disproportionately located in racial and ethnic minority neighborhoods. They were also located in areas with lower incomes compared to those in the surrounding county. No relationship was observed between the hazard ranking of the TRI facilities overall and socioeconomic characteristics of the community in which they were located.

Full text

PDF
217

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Paull J. M. The origin and basis of threshold limit values. Am J Ind Med. 1984;5(3):227–238. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700050306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Sexton K., Callahan M. A., Bryan E. F. Estimating exposure and dose to characterize health risks: the role of human tissue monitoring in exposure assessment. Environ Health Perspect. 1995 Apr;103 (Suppl 3):13–29. doi: 10.1289/ehp.95103s313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Stockwell J. R., Sorensen J. W., Eckert J. W., Jr, Carreras E. M. The U.S. EPA Geographic Information System for mapping environmental releases of Toxic Chemical Release Inventory (TRI) chemicals. Risk Anal. 1993 Apr;13(2):155–164. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb01065.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES