Abstract
Epidemiological studies examining the association between exposure to tap water contaminants (such as chlorination by-products) and disease outcomes (such as cancer and adverse reproductive outcomes) have been limited by inaccurate exposure assessment. Failure to take into account the variation in beverage and tap water consumption and exposure to volatile contaminants through inhalation and dermal absorption can introduce misclassification in assessing the association between exposure to tap water contaminants and health. To refine exposure assessment of tap water contaminants, we describe in detail the tap water consumption, showering, and bathing habits of pregnant women and their male partners as assessed by a questionnaire and a 3-day water diary. We found good agreement between questionnaire and 3-day water diary values for drinking water intake (Pearson's r = 0.78) and for time spent showering(r = 0.68) and bathing (r = 0.78). Half of the participants consumed tap water on a regular basis with an overall mean +/- 1 standard deviation (SD) of 0. 78 +/- 0.51 l/day. Our results further suggest that full-time employees, compared to women working part-time or less, have more heterogeneous consumption patterns over time. Seventy-nine percent of women and 94% of men took showers for an average of 11.6 +/-4.0 min and 10.4 +/- 4.8 min, respectively. Baths were taken more frequently by women than men (21% vs. 3%) for an average of 22.9 +/-10.1 min and 21.3 +/- 12.4 min, respectively. Thus, these patterns of tap water use should be considered in the design and interpretation of environmental epidemiology studies.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bland J. M., Altman D. G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307–310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ershow A. G., Brown L. M., Cantor K. P. Intake of tapwater and total water by pregnant and lactating women. Am J Public Health. 1991 Mar;81(3):328–334. doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.3.328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hertz-Picciotto I., Swan S. H., Neutra R. R., Samuels S. J. Spontaneous abortions in relation to consumption of tap water: an application of methods from survival analysis to a pregnancy follow-up study. Am J Epidemiol. 1989 Jul;130(1):79–93. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lynch C. F., Woolson R. F., O'Gorman T., Cantor K. P. Chlorinated drinking water and bladder cancer: effect of misclassification on risk estimates. Arch Environ Health. 1989 Jul-Aug;44(4):252–259. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1989.9935891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rimm E. B., Giovannucci E. L., Stampfer M. J., Colditz G. A., Litin L. B., Willett W. C. Reproducibility and validity of an expanded self-administered semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire among male health professionals. Am J Epidemiol. 1992 May 15;135(10):1114–1136. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sharrett A. R., Carter A. P., Orheim R. M., Feinleib M. Daily intake of lead, cadmium, copper, and zinc from drinking water: The Seattle Study of Trace Metal Exposure. Environ Res. 1982 Aug;28(2):456–475. doi: 10.1016/0013-9351(82)90142-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weisel C. P., Jo W. K. Ingestion, inhalation, and dermal exposures to chloroform and trichloroethene from tap water. Environ Health Perspect. 1996 Jan;104(1):48–51. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9610448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]