Abstract
The EPA uses an exposure assessment model to estimate daily intake to chemicals of potential concern. At the Anaconda Superfund site in Montana, the EPA exposure assessment model was used to predict total and speciated urinary arsenic concentrations. Predicted concentrations were then compared to concentrations measured in children living near the site. When site-specific information on concentrations of arsenic in soil, interior dust, and diet, site-specific ingestion rates, and arsenic absorption rates were used, measured and predicted urinary arsenic concentrations were in reasonable agreement. The central tendency exposure assessment model successfully described the measured urinary arsenic concentration for the majority of children at the site. The reasonable maximum exposure assessment model successfully identified the uppermost exposed population. While the agreement between measured and predicted urinary arsenic is good, it is not exact. The variables that were identified which influenced agreement included soil and dust sample collection methodology, daily urinary volume, soil ingestion rate, and the ability to define the exposure unit. The concentration of arsenic in food affected agreement between measured and predicted total urinary arsenic, but was not considered when comparing measured and predicted speciated urinary arsenic. Speciated urinary arsenic is the recommended biomarker for recent inorganic arsenic exposure. By using site-specific data in the exposure assessment model, predicted risks from exposure to arsenic were less than predicted risks would have been if the EPA's default values had been used in the exposure assessment model. This difference resulted in reduced magnitude and cost of remediation while still protecting human health.
Full text
PDFdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b159/5b159638199ebbfdb9eda884c5afd2543d4d6385" alt="133"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0cfd/f0cfd069b6a4f10bf09a33162a81203fd6783398" alt="134"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6beda/6bedae6db607978c79c42cb1b1336ba521eec6a9" alt="135"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1300/f1300d8568e3cb37bab5186833c8e9f8e92cfbb5" alt="136"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c0e4/7c0e46ec607979ba9fbac962b491d319b8185026" alt="137"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7e1f/d7e1f8b5752272ca66dc3c3e34af628425fc8ccd" alt="138"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25723/257230c1007e857e6892ab7beff853902f31be93" alt="139"
Images in this article
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Crecelius E. A. Changes in the chemical speciation of arsenic following ingestion by man. Environ Health Perspect. 1977 Aug;19:147–150. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7719147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Duggan M. J., Inskip M. J., Rundle S. A., Moorcroft J. S. Lead in playground dust and on the hands of schoolchildren. Sci Total Environ. 1985 Jul;44(1):65–79. doi: 10.1016/0048-9697(85)90051-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Freeman G. B., Johnson J. D., Killinger J. M., Liao S. C., Davis A. O., Ruby M. V., Chaney R. L., Lovre S. C., Bergstrom P. D. Bioavailability of arsenic in soil impacted by smelter activities following oral administration in rabbits. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1993 Jul;21(1):83–88. doi: 10.1006/faat.1993.1075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Freeman G. B., Schoof R. A., Ruby M. V., Davis A. O., Dill J. A., Liao S. C., Lapin C. A., Bergstrom P. D. Bioavailability of arsenic in soil and house dust impacted by smelter activities following oral administration in cynomolgus monkeys. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1995 Dec;28(2):215–222. doi: 10.1006/faat.1995.1162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Georis B., Cardenas A., Buchet J. P., Lauwerys R. Inorganic arsenic methylation by rat tissue slices. Toxicology. 1990 Jul;63(1):73–84. doi: 10.1016/0300-483x(90)90070-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hopenhayn-Rich C., Smith A. H., Goeden H. M. Human studies do not support the methylation threshold hypothesis for the toxicity of inorganic arsenic. Environ Res. 1993 Feb;60(2):161–177. doi: 10.1006/enrs.1993.1024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hwang Y. H., Bornschein R. L., Grote J., Menrath W., Roda S. Environmental arsenic exposure of children around a former copper smelter site. Environ Res. 1997 Jan;72(1):72–81. doi: 10.1006/enrs.1996.3691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tseng W. P., Chu H. M., How S. W., Fong J. M., Lin C. S., Yeh S. Prevalence of skin cancer in an endemic area of chronic arsenicism in Taiwan. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1968 Mar;40(3):453–463. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tseng W. P. Effects and dose--response relationships of skin cancer and blackfoot disease with arsenic. Environ Health Perspect. 1977 Aug;19:109–119. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7719109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]