Skip to main content
PMC home page
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 1998 Feb;106(Suppl 1):277–283. doi: 10.1289/ehp.98106s1277

The adaptive response in radiobiology: evolving insights and implications.

S Wolff 1
PMCID: PMC1533272  PMID: 9539019

Abstract

The first of the regularly reproducible experiments to show that very low doses of ionizing radiation, like very low doses of chemical agents, could induce mechanisms whereby cells become better fit to cope with subsequent exposures to high doses were carried out on the induction of chromosome aberrations in cultures of human lymphocytes. If cells that had been exposed to a very low dose (1 cGy) of X rays were subsequently exposed to a relatively high dose (1 Gy), approximately half as many chromosome breaks were induced. Subsequent experiments showed that this adaptive response to low doses requires a certain minimal dose before it becomes active; occurs only within a relatively small window of dose; is dose-rate dependent; and depends on the genetic constitution of the people or animals exposed, with some being unresponsive. It was further shown that the response to the low-dose preexposure was not instantaneous but took approximately 4 to 6 hr to become fully active, and could be prevented if during this period protein synthesis was inhibited, i.e., a necessary protein (enzyme) was being induced. In fact, subsequent experiments with two-dimensional gel electrophoresis showed new proteins in cells irradiated with 1 to 2 cGy. The adaptation induced by low doses of radiation was therefore attributed to the induction of a novel efficient chromosome break repair mechanism that if active at the time of challenge with high doses would lead to less residual damage. This hypothesis was strengthened by a series of experiments in which it was found that inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase, an enzyme implicated in DNA strand break rejoining, could prevent the adaptive response. Although the phenomenon is well established in cellular systems, it is still problematical as to whether or not it will have any utility in establishing risks of ionizing radiation to humans. Newer experiments have now been carried out on the mechanisms underlying the effect and whether or not the effect can manifest itself as a decrease in the number of induced cancers and radiation-induced mortality. Experiments with restriction enzymes now indicate that double-strand breaks in DNA can be triggering events in adaptation. In addition, preliminary experiments on the survival of whole-body irradiated mice have shown that multiple exposures to low adapting doses can have profound effects on survival, and other experiments have shown that adaptation can affect the induction of thymic lymphoma in irradiated mice. It therefore appears that the initial experiments behind the adaptive response have led to a vigorous worldwide effort to understand the basic mechanisms behind it. This effort is stimulated both by a desire to understand the basic cell biology behind the response and a desire to see if indeed this phenomenon affects the estimation of risks of low-level radiation exposure.

Full text

PDF
277

Images in this article

279Figure 1
on p.279
280Figure 2
on p.280

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bhattacharjee D. Role of radioadaptation on radiation-induced thymic lymphoma in mice. Mutat Res. 1996 Nov 4;358(2):231–235. doi: 10.1016/s0027-5107(96)00125-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bhattacharjee D. Role of radioadaptation on radiation-induced thymic lymphoma in mice. Mutat Res. 1996 Nov 4;358(2):231–235. doi: 10.1016/s0027-5107(96)00125-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boothman D. A., Meyers M., Fukunaga N., Lee S. W. Isolation of x-ray-inducible transcripts from radioresistant human melanoma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Aug 1;90(15):7200–7204. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.15.7200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bosi A., Olivieri G. Variability of the adaptive response to ionizing radiations in humans. Mutat Res. 1989 Mar;211(1):13–17. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(89)90102-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cai L., Liu S. Z. Induction of cytogenetic adaptive response of somatic and germ cells in vivo and in vitro by low-dose X-irradiation. Int J Radiat Biol. 1990 Jul;58(1):187–194. doi: 10.1080/09553009014551541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fritz-Niggli H., Schaeppi-Buechi C. Adaptive response to dominant lethality of mature (class A) and immature (class B) oocytes of D. melanogaster to low doses of ionizing radiation: effects in repair-proficient (yw) and repair-deficient strains (mei 41D5 and mus 302D1). Int J Radiat Biol. 1991 Jan;59(1):175–184. doi: 10.1080/09553009114550161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ikushima T. Chromosomal responses to ionizing radiation reminiscent of an adaptive response in cultured Chinese hamster cells. Mutat Res. 1987 Oct;180(2):215–221. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(87)90217-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kelsey K. T., Memisoglu A., Frenkel D., Liber H. L. Human lymphocytes exposed to low doses of X-rays are less susceptible to radiation-induced mutagenesis. Mutat Res. 1991 Aug;263(4):197–201. doi: 10.1016/0165-7992(91)90001-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Liang P., Averboukh L., Pardee A. B. Distribution and cloning of eukaryotic mRNAs by means of differential display: refinements and optimization. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 Jul 11;21(14):3269–3275. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.14.3269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Liang P., Pardee A. B. Differential display of eukaryotic messenger RNA by means of the polymerase chain reaction. Science. 1992 Aug 14;257(5072):967–971. doi: 10.1126/science.1354393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Natarajan A. T., Obe G., van Zeeland A. A., Palitti F., Meijers M., Verdegaal-Immerzeel E. A. Molecular mechanisms involved in the production of chromosomal aberrations. II. Utilization of Neurospora endonuclease for the study of aberration production by X-rays in G1 and G2 stages of the cell cycle. Mutat Res. 1980 Feb;69(2):293–305. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(80)90094-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Olivieri G., Bodycote J., Wolff S. Adaptive response of human lymphocytes to low concentrations of radioactive thymidine. Science. 1984 Feb 10;223(4636):594–597. doi: 10.1126/science.6695170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rigaud O., Papadopoulo D., Moustacchi E. Decreased deletion mutation in radioadapted human lymphoblasts. Radiat Res. 1993 Jan;133(1):94–101. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Samson L., Schwartz J. L. Evidence for an adaptive DNA repair pathway in CHO and human skin fibroblast cell lines. Nature. 1980 Oct 30;287(5785):861–863. doi: 10.1038/287861a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sanderson B. J., Morley A. A. Exposure of human lymphocytes to ionizing radiation reduces mutagenesis by subsequent ionizing radiation. Mutat Res. 1986 Dec;164(6):347–351. doi: 10.1016/0165-1161(86)90027-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sankaranarayanan K., von Duyn A., Loos M. J., Natarajan A. T. Adaptive response of human lymphocytes to low-level radiation from radioisotopes or X-rays. Mutat Res. 1989 Mar;211(1):7–12. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(89)90101-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Shadley J. D., Afzal V., Wolff S. Characterization of the adaptive response to ionizing radiation induced by low doses of X rays to human lymphocytes. Radiat Res. 1987 Sep;111(3):511–517. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Shadley J. D., Wolff S. Very low doses of X-rays can cause human lymphocytes to become less susceptible to ionizing radiation. Mutagenesis. 1987 Mar;2(2):95–96. doi: 10.1093/mutage/2.2.95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wiencke J. K., Afzal V., Olivieri G., Wolff S. Evidence that the [3H]thymidine-induced adaptive response of human lymphocytes to subsequent doses of X-rays involves the induction of a chromosomal repair mechanism. Mutagenesis. 1986 Sep;1(5):375–380. doi: 10.1093/mutage/1.5.375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wolff S., Afzal V., Wiencke J. K., Olivieri G., Michaeli A. Human lymphocytes exposed to low doses of ionizing radiations become refractory to high doses of radiation as well as to chemical mutagens that induce double-strand breaks in DNA. Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med. 1988 Jan;53(1):39–47. doi: 10.1080/09553008814550401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wolff S. The repair of x-ray-induced chromosome aberrations in stimulated and unstimulated human lymphocytes. Mutat Res. 1972 Aug;15(4):435–444. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(72)90007-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Yonezawa M., Misonoh J., Hosokawa Y. Two types of X-ray-induced radioresistance in mice: presence of 4 dose ranges with distinct biological effects. Mutat Res. 1996 Nov 4;358(2):237–243. doi: 10.1016/s0027-5107(96)00126-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Youngblom J. H., Wiencke J. K., Wolff S. Inhibition of the adaptive response of human lymphocytes to very low doses of ionizing radiation by the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide. Mutat Res. 1989 Dec;227(4):257–261. doi: 10.1016/0165-7992(89)90107-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhou P. K., Liu X. Y., Sun W. Z., Zhang Y. P., Wei K. Cultured mouse SR-1 cells exposed to low dose of gamma-rays become less susceptible to the induction of mutagenesis by radiation as well as bleomycin. Mutagenesis. 1993 Mar;8(2):109–111. doi: 10.1093/mutage/8.2.109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES