Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 1998 Dec;106(Suppl 6):1291–1293. doi: 10.1289/ehp.98106s61291

Maximum workplace concentration values and carcinogenicity classification for mixtures.

R Bartsch 1, S Forderkunz 1, U Reuter 1, H Sterzl-Eckert 1, H Greim 1
PMCID: PMC1533424  PMID: 9860883

Abstract

In Germany, the Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area (MAK Commission) generally sets maximum workplace concentration values (i.e., a proposed occupational exposure level [OEL]) for single substances, not for mixtures. For mixtures containing substances with a genotoxic and carcinogenic potential, the commission considered it scientifically inappropriate to establish a safe threshold. This approach is currently under discussion. Carcinogenic mixtures are categorized according to either the carcinogenicity of the mixture or the classification of the carcinogenic substances included. In regulating exposure to mixtures, an approach similar to that used by the American Conference of Governmental Hygienists is proposed: For components with the same target organ and mode of action or interfering metabolism, synergistic effects must be expected and the respective OELs must be lowered. However, if there is proof that the components act independently, the OELs of the individual compounds are not considered to be modified. In the view of the commission, calculating OELs for solvent mixtures according to their liquid phase composition is not justified, and the setting of scientifically based OELs for complex mixtures is not possible.

Full text

PDF
1291

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bolt H. M., Mumtaz M. M. Risk assessment of mixtures and standard setting: working towards practical compromises. Food Chem Toxicol. 1996 Nov-Dec;34(11-12):1179–1181. doi: 10.1016/s0278-6915(97)00096-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cassee F. R., Arts J. H., Groten J. P., Feron V. J. Sensory irritation to mixtures of formaldehyde, acrolein, and acetaldehyde in rats. Arch Toxicol. 1996;70(6):329–337. doi: 10.1007/s002040050282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Groten J. P., Schoen E. D., van Bladeren P. J., Kuper C. F., van Zorge J. A., Feron V. J. Subacute toxicity of a mixture of nine chemicals in rats: detecting interactive effects with a fractionated two-level factorial design. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1997 Mar;36(1):15–29. doi: 10.1006/faat.1996.2281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hasegawa R., Cabral R., Hoshiya T., Hakoi K., Ogiso T., Boonyaphiphat P., Shirai T., Ito N. Carcinogenic potential of some pesticides in a medium-term multi-organ bioassay in rats. Int J Cancer. 1993 May 28;54(3):489–493. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910540322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hasegawa R., Tanaka H., Tamano S., Shirai T., Nagao M., Sugimura T., Ito N. Synergistic enhancement of small and large intestinal carcinogenesis by combined treatment of rats with five heterocyclic amines in a medium-term multi-organ bioassay. Carcinogenesis. 1994 Nov;15(11):2567–2573. doi: 10.1093/carcin/15.11.2567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Henschler D., Bolt H. M., Jonker D., Pieters M. N., Groten J. P. Experimental designs and risk assessment in combination toxicology: panel discussion. Food Chem Toxicol. 1996 Nov-Dec;34(11-12):1183–1185. doi: 10.1016/s0278-6915(97)00097-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ito N., Hasegawa R., Imaida K., Kurata Y., Hagiwara A., Shirai T. Effect of ingestion of 20 pesticides in combination at acceptable daily intake levels on rat liver carcinogenesis. Food Chem Toxicol. 1995 Feb;33(2):159–163. doi: 10.1016/0278-6915(94)00118-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jonker D., Woutersen R. A., Feron V. J. Toxicity of mixtures of nephrotoxicants with similar or dissimilar mode of action. Food Chem Toxicol. 1996 Nov-Dec;34(11-12):1075–1082. doi: 10.1016/s0278-6915(97)00077-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jonker D., Woutersen R. A., van Bladeren P. J., Til H. P., Feron V. J. 4-week oral toxicity study of a combination of eight chemicals in rats: comparison with the toxicity of the individual compounds. Food Chem Toxicol. 1990 Sep;28(9):623–631. doi: 10.1016/0278-6915(90)90170-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jonker D., Woutersen R. A., van Bladeren P. J., Til H. P., Feron V. J. Subacute (4-wk) oral toxicity of a combination of four nephrotoxins in rats: comparison with the toxicity of the individual compounds. Food Chem Toxicol. 1993 Feb;31(2):125–136. doi: 10.1016/0278-6915(93)90126-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mumtaz M. M., Sipes I. G., Clewell H. J., Yang R. S. Risk assessment of chemical mixtures: biologic and toxicologic issues. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1993 Oct;21(3):258–269. doi: 10.1006/faat.1993.1098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Neumann H. G., Thielmann H. W., Filser J. G., Gelbke H. P., Greim H., Kappus H., Norpoth K. H., Reuter U., Vamvakas S., Wardenbach P. Proposed changes in the classification of carcinogenic chemicals in the work area. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1997 Dec;26(3):288–295. doi: 10.1006/rtph.1997.1152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sterzl-Eckert H., Greim H. Occupational exposure. Food Chem Toxicol. 1996 Nov-Dec;34(11-12):1177–1178. doi: 10.1016/s0278-6915(97)00095-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES