Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2002 Feb;40(2):645–648. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.2.645-648.2002

Diffusely Adherent Escherichia coli as a Cause of Acute Diarrhea in Young Children in Northeast Brazil: a Case-Control Study

Isabel C A Scaletsky 1,*, Sandra H Fabbricotti 1, Rozane L B Carvalho 2, Claudia R Nunes 3, Helcio S Maranhão 4, Mauro B Morais 2, Ulysses Fagundes-Neto 2
PMCID: PMC153384  PMID: 11825986

Abstract

In a prospective study carried out in two urban centers in northeastern Brazil, 195 HEp-2-adherent Escherichia coli strains were isolated; 110 were identified as the only pathogen in stools of children with diarrhea, and 85 were from controls. Enteropathogenic E. coli isolates were identified in 21 children with diarrhea (8.9%) and 7 children without diarrhea (3.0%), and they were significantly associated with diarrhea (P < 0.01). Enteroaggregative E. coli strains were isolated from 40 children with diarrhea (16.9%) and 38 children without diarrhea (16.4%) and showed no correlation with diarrhea (P > 0.5). In 49 children with diarrhea (20.7%) and 40 children without diarrhea (17.3%), diffusely adherent E. coli (DAEC) isolates were detected and were not found to be associated with diarrhea (P = 0.41). However, after stratification, for children older than 12 months of age a significant correlation between DAEC infection and diarrhea was detected (P = 0.01). These results suggest that DAEC isolates should be considered potential pathogens in northeastern Brazil and also confirm the association of DAEC with age-dependent diarrhea.


Diarrhea remains an important public health problem for children in developing areas of northeastern Brazil. The bacterial pathogen most commonly associated with endemic forms of childhood diarrhea is Escherichia coli. At least five categories of diarrheagenic E. coli strains are recognized on the basis of distinct epidemiological and clinical features, specific virulence determinants, and an association with certain serotypes: enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC), enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), and enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC) (13). Recently, diffusely adherent E. coli (DAEC) strains have been recognized as the sixth class of diarrheagenic E. coli and appear as a heterogeneous group (13). EPEC, EAEC, and DAEC isolates are characterized by their distinct patterns of adherence to cultured epithelial cells in vitro. EPEC strains bind to host cells in a pattern called localized adherence (LA), in which microcolonies form on the surfaces of the cells (15). EAEC isolates bind in an aggregative adherence (AA) pattern, which is characterized by a stacked brick-like arrangement on the surfaces of the cells as well as those of glass or plastic containers (13). DAEC strains are defined by a pattern of diffuse adherence (DA), in which the bacteria uniformly cover the entire cell surface (15). The implication of DAEC strains in diarrhea remains controversial, since some studies have reported that these strains are found similarly in children with and without diarrhea (6, 8). Tacket et al. (18) were unable to conclusively induce diarrhea with DAEC in adult volunteers but suggested that DAEC may cause disease in immunologically naive or malnourished children. Discrepancies among epidemiological studies could be explained by age-dependent susceptibility to diarrhea or by the use of an inappropriate detection method such as DNA probing (10). The current prospective case-control study was done to determine the role of DAEC strains as a cause of acute diarrhea in northeastern Brazil, where childhood diarrhea is endemic.

The study was conducted at the Hospital de Pediatria da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (Natal, Rio Grande do Norte) and the Hospital Universitário Materno-Infantil (São Luiz, Maranhão). All children less than 2 years of age with acute diarrhea who were brought to the hospital ambulatory clinics from May 1998 to June 1999 were enrolled in the study. Clinical information was collected by means of a standard questionnaire. A control group of children who were examined during the same time period contained asymptomatic children who were matched with children in the study group by age and who were randomly selected from the well-child outpatient clinics of the same hospitals.

Two rectal swab specimens were collected from each child, placed in Cary-Blair transport medium, and processed within 4 h. One swab specimen was processed by routine microbiological and biochemical tests to identify E. coli, Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., Campylobacter spp., and Yersinia enterocolitica, while the second swab specimen was stored in 2 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4) at 4°C until it was tested for rotavirus by enzyme immunoassay. Fecal samples and/or rectal swab specimens were obtained for detection of Giardia lamblia, Entamoeba histolytica, and Cryptosporidium spp. E. coli strains were isolated on MacConkey agar plates. Four separate lactose-fermenting colonies, presumed to be E. coli by colony morphology, and two non-lactose-fermenting colonies of each distinct morphologic type were cultivated in commercial test systems (PROBAC do Brasil, São Paulo, Brazil) for biochemical confirmation of the species or genus. All E. coli colonies were submitted to slide agglutination with polyvalent and monovalent antisera (PROBAC do Brasil) against the O antigens of EPEC serogroups and EHEC strains. All E. coli strains were maintained in nutrient agar slants at room temperature.

All E. coli isolates were screened by colony DNA hybridization for detection of the diarrheagenic E. coli isolates listed in Table 1. The DNA probes were labeled with 50 μCi of [α-32P]dCTP by use of a random primer extension kit (Rediprime DNA Labelling system; Amersham). Colony blots were hybridized at 65°C overnight, washed with 0.1× SSC (1× SSC is 0.15 M NaCl plus 0.015 M sodium citrate)-0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate solution, and exposed to X-ray film overnight at −80°C.

TABLE 1.

DNA probes and control strains used for DNA hybridization assays

E. coli category DNA probe specific fora: Fragment used as a probe [restriction endonuclease(s)] Control strain(s)b Reference
ETEC Enterotoxin LT pCVD403 (1.3-kb BamHI fragment) H10407 11
Enterotoxin STp pCVD426 (157-bp PstI fragment)
Enterotoxin STh pCVD427 (216-bp EcoRI fragment)
EIEC Invasion pPS55 (2.5-kb HindIII fragment) EDL1284 17
EHEC Adherence pCVD419 (3.4-kb HindIII fragment) EDL933 14
Shiga toxin 1 pJN37-19 (1.142-kb BamHI fragment)
Shiga toxin 2 pNN110-18 (842-bp SmaI-PstI fragment)
EPEC EAF pJPN16 (1-kb BamHI-SalI fragment) E2348/69 12
eaeA pCVD434 (1-kb SalI-KpnI fragment) 9
DAEC daaC pSLM852 (390-bp PstI fragment) C1845 3
AIDA-I pIB6 (450-bp EcoRI fragment) 2787 2
EAEC AA pCVD432 (1-kb EcoRI-PstI fragment) 042 1
a

EAF, EPEC adherence factor plasmid; eae, the gene encoding intimin, an outer membrane protein involved in the attaching-effacing lesions promoted by EPEC; daaC, a gene associated with the biogenesis of F1845, a fimbrial adhesin involved in DA, AIDA-I, a protein associated with the DA phenotype; AA, with aggregative adherence plasmid pattern; LT, heat-labile enterotoxin; STp, porcine heat-stable enterotoxin; STh, human heat-stable enterotoxin.

b

The negative control was E. coli K-12 strain C600.

All E. coli isolates were individually tested for specific patterns of LA, DA, and AA to HEp-2 cells as described by Scaletsky et al. (15).

Data derived from children with diarrhea and from controls were compared by two-tailed chi-square and Fisher's exact tests.

In total, 468 fecal samples (of which 237 samples were from symptomatic children) were examined for enteric pathogens (Table 2). Rotavirus and Shigella spp. were isolated from 51 (21.5%) and 38 (16%) children with diarrhea, respectively, and from 13 (5.6%) and 5 (2.2%) controls, respectively (for both groups, P < 0.01). Salmonella spp. were isolated from three children with diarrhea and one control, G. lamblia was isolated from three children with diarrhea and three controls, and E. histolytica was isolated from two children with diarrhea and one control (P > 0.05).

TABLE 2.

Isolation of pathogens from the stools of children with diarrheaa

Pathogen and test No. (%) of children infected
P valueb
Diarrhea group Control group
Rotavirus 51 (21.5) 13 (5.6) <0.01
Shigella spp. 38 (16.0) 5 (2.1) <0.01
Salmonella spp. 3 (1.3) 1 (0.4) 0.97
E. histolytica 2 (0.8) 1 (0.4) 0.33
G. lamblia 3 (1.3) 3 (1.3) 0.58
Rotavirus + EAEC 2 (0.8) 0
Rotavirus + DAEC 3 (1.3) 0
Shigella spp + DAEC 2 (0.8) 0
DAEC
With daaC probe 31 (13.1) 27 (11.7) 0.75
By HEp-2 assay (DA pattern) 49 (20.7) 40 (17.3) 0.41
EAEC
With AA probe 21 (8.9) 27 (11.7) 0.39
By HEp-2 assay (AA pattern) 40 (16.9) 38 (16.4) 1.00
EPEC typical
With eaeA and EAF probes 21 (8.9) 7 (3.0) <0.01
By HEp-2 assay (LA pattern) 21 (8.9) 7 (3.0) <0.01
EPEC atypical, by eaeA probe 13 (5.5) 13 (5.6) 0.89
a

A total of 237 children with diarrhea less than 2 years of age and 231 matched controls were studied.

b

P values were determined by chi-square or Fisher's exact, test. Boldface data indicate a significant difference.

E. coli isolates were tested with DNA probes to classify them into the different categories, and the same E. coli strains were also tested by the HEp-2 cell adhesion assay to identify the different adherence patterns (Table 2). A total of 221 diarrheagenic E. coli strains were isolated from the 468 fecal specimens: 26 nonadherent EPEC strains (atypical EPEC) and 195 HEp-2-adherent E. coli strains. Among the latter isolates, 110 were identified as the only pathogen in the stools of children with diarrhea, and 85 were from controls.

Twenty-one children with diarrhea (8.9%) and seven children without diarrhea (3.0%) carried typical EPEC strains that were significantly associated with diarrhea (P < 0.01), particularly among children <6 months old (Table 3). EPEC has been shown to be an important cause of diarrhea in the region studied as well as in other regions of Brazil (16).

TABLE 3.

Diarrheagenic E. coli detected among patients and controls by age groupa

Organism Age groupb (mo) No. (%) of infected children
P valuef
Diarrhea group Control
DAEC 0-5 8 (13.8)c 9 (16.1)c 0.93
6-12 27 (21.6)c 28 (22.6)c 0.97
13-24 14 (25.9) 3 (5.9) 0.01
Total 49 (20.7) 40 (17.3) 0.41
EAEC 0-5 13 (22.4)c 7 (12.5)c 0.25
6-12 21 (16.8)c 24 (19.3)c 0.13
13-24 6 (11.1)c 7 (13.7)c 0.88
Total 40 (16.9) 38 (16.4) 1.00
EPEC,d typical 0-5 14 (24.1) 2 (3.6) 0.003
6-12 7 (5.6) 5 (4.0) 0.77
13-24 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
Total 21 (8.9) 7 (3.0) <0.01
EPEC,e atypical 0-5 5 (8.6) 1 (1.8) 0.11
6-12 6 (4.8) 9 (7.2) 0.58
13-24 2 (3.7) 3 (5.9) 0.47
Total 13 (5.5) 13 (5.6) 0.89
a

A total of 237 children with diarrhea less than 2 years of age and 231 matched controls were studied.

b

For children with diarrhea there were 58, 125, and 54 children in each of the three age groups, respectively. For the controls, there were 56, 124, and 51 children in each of the three age groups, respectively.

c

The isolates hybridized with the specific DNA probe.

d

Typical isolates were EAF positive.

e

Atypical isolates were EAF negative, and nonadherent.

f

Pvalues were determined by chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Boldface data indicate a significant difference.

Forty children with diarrhea (16.9%) and 38 children without diarrhea (16.4%) were infected with EAEC; thus, there was no correlation between EAEC carriage and diarrhea (P = 1.00). Similarly, there was no age-related association of diarrhea with the presence of EAEC in feces (Table 3). However, in the group aged 0 to 5 months, the frequency of EAEC isolation was twofold higher for children with diarrhea. A number of EAEC isolates failed to hybridize with the EAEC probe. Studies in Fortaleza, another large urban center in northeastern Brazil, have associated EAEC with persistent diarrhea (4). However, in the present study, all the episodes identified were acute diarrhea.

DAEC was recovered from the stools of 49 children with diarrhea (20.7%) and 40 children without diarrhea (17.3%) (Table 2). Thus, overall, DAEC was not significantly associated with diarrhea (P = 0.41). In children <12 months of age, the presence of a DAEC isolate was not significantly associated with diarrhea (P = 0.95). In contrast, DAEC was significantly associated with diarrhea in children >12 months of age (P = 0.01) (Table 3); the symptoms found in these children were not distinct from those observed in children <12 months of age. None of the DAEC strains were positive for the classic serogroups tested, and none of them reacted with the AIDA-I probe. Thirty-one (13.1%) DAEC strains from children with diarrhea and 27 (11.7%) DAEC strains from the control group hybridized with the daaC probe; all the DAEC isolates from children >12 months of age were negative for hybridization with this probe. In a study conducted in New Caledonia, France, DAEC probe-positive strains were significantly associated with diarrhea only in children upon 2 years of age (5).

Our results demonstrate the previously unrecognized importance of DAEC as a cause of childhood diarrhea in the region of Brazil studied and support the evidence from prospective case-control studies showing an association of DAEC with age-dependent diarrhea (7). In the present study, DAEC was associated with diarrhea in children >12 months of age; in contrast, the presence of DAEC in younger children was not associated with diarrhea. Further characterization of the virulence factors of DAEC strains, including identification of the adhesins of daaC-negative DAEC isolates from the present study, is under investigation.

In conclusion, our findings support the association of DAEC with diarrheal disease in children >12 months of age. Statistical analysis of E. coli strains isolated from diarrheal stool specimens and controls indicated that diffusely adherent E. coli strains should be considered potential pathogens in northeastern Brazil.

Acknowledgments

We thank Beatriz A. Castilho and Alfredo G. Torres for critical reading of the manuscript and helpful suggestions.

This work was supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifíco e Tecnológico (CNPq).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Baudry, B., S. J. Savarino, P. Vial, J. B. Kaper, and M. M. Levine. 1990. A sensitive and specific DNA probe to identify enteroaggregative E. coli, a recently discovered diarrheal pathogen. J. Infect. Dis. 161:1249-1251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Benz, I., and M. A. Schmidt. 1989. Cloning and expression of an adhesin (AIDA-I) involved in diffuse adherence of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Infect. Immun. 57:1506-1511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bilge, S. S., C. R. Clausen, W. Lau, and S. L. Moseley. 1989. Molecular characterization of a fimbrial adhesin, F1845, mediating diffuse adherence of diarrhea-associated Escherichia coli to HEp-2 cells. J. Bacteriol. 171:4281-4289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fang, G. D., A. A. M. Lima, C. V. Martins, J. P. Nataro, and R. L. Guerrant. 1995. Etiology and epidemiology of persistent diarrhea in northeastern Brazil: a hospital-based, prospective, case-control study. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 21:137-144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Germani, Y., E. Begaud, P. Duval, and C. Le Bouguenec. 1996. Prevalence of enteropathogenic, enteroaggregative, and diffusely adherent Escherichia coli among isolates from children with diarrhea in New Caledonia. J. Infect. Dis. 174:1124-1126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Girón, J. A., T. Jones, F. Millán-Velasco, E. Castro-Munoz, L. Zarate, J. Fry, G. Frankel, S. L. Moseley, B. Baudry, J. B. Kaper, G. K. Schoolnik, and L. W. Riley. 1991. Diffuse-adhering Escherichia coli (DAEC) as a putative cause of diarrhea in Mayan children in Mexico. J. Infect. Dis. 163:507-513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gunzburg, S. T., B. J. Chang, S. J. Elliot, V. Burke, and M. Gracey. 1993. Diffuse and enteroaggregative patterns of adherence of enteric Escherichia coli from aboriginal children from the Kimberley region of Western Australia. J. Infect. Dis. 167:755-758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jallat, C., V. Livrelli, A. Darfeuille-Michaud, C. Rich, and B. Joly. 1993. Escherichia coli strains involved in diarrhea in France: high prevalence and heterogeneity of diffusely adhering strains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:2031-2037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jerse, A. E., Y. Jun, B. D. Tall, and J. B. Kaper. 1990. A genetic locus of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli necessary for the production of attaching and effacing lesions on tissue culture cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:7839-7843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Levine, M. M., Ferrecio, V. Prado, M. Cayazzo, P. Abrego, J. Martinez, L. Maggi, M. M. Baldini, W. Martin, D. Maneval, B. Kay, L. Guers, H. Lior, S. S. Wasserman, and J. P. Nataro. 1993. Epidemiological studies of Escherichia coli diarrheal infections in a low socioeconomic level peri-urban community in Santiago, Chile. Am. J. Epidemiol. 138:849-898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mosely, S. L., I. Huq, A. R. M. A. Alim, M. So, M. Samadpour-Motalebi, and S. Falkow. 1980. Detection of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli by DNA colony hybridization. J. Infect. Dis. 142:892-898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nataro, J. P., M. M. Baldini, J. B. Kaper, R. E. Black, N. Bravo, and M. M. Levine. 1985. Detection of an adherence factor of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli with a DNA probe. J. Infect. Dis. 152:560-565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nataro, J. P., and J. B. Kaper. 1998. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 11:142-201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Newland, J. W., and R. J. Neill. 1988. DNA probes for Shiga-like toxins I and II and for toxin-converting bacteriophages. J. Clin. Microbiol. 26:1292-1297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Scaletsky, I. C. A., M. L. M. Silva, and L. R. Trabulsi. 1984. Distinctive patterns of adherence of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli to HeLa cells. Infect. Immun. 45:534-536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Scaletsky, I. C. A., M. Z. Pedroso, C. A. G. Oliva, R. L. B. Carvalho, M. B. Morals, and U. Fagundes-Neto. 1999. A localized adherence-like pattern as a second pattern of adherence of classic enteropathogenic Escherichia coli to HEp-2 cells that is associated with infantile diarrhea. Infect. Immun. 67:3410-3415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Small, P. L., and S. Falkow. 1986. Development of a DNA probe for the virulence plasmid of Shigella spp. and enteroinvasive Escherichia coli, p. 121-124. In L. Leive, P. F. Bonventre, J. A. Morello, S. D. Silver, and W. C. Wu (ed.), Microbiology—1986. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
  • 18.Tacket, C. O., S. L. Moseley, B. Kay, G. Losonsky, and M. M. Levine. 1990. Challenge studies in volunteers using Escherichia coli strains with diffuse adherence to HEp-2 cells. J. Infect. Dis. 162:550-552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES