Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Clinical and Experimental Immunology logoLink to Clinical and Experimental Immunology
. 1980 Jul;41(1):55–62.

Characterization of antisera against bovine prolactin for in vivo studies on prolactin function in the rat.

R Kofler, M Tabarelli, S Schwarz, H Wolf, K Loewit, G Wick
PMCID: PMC1536915  PMID: 7002391

Abstract

The IgG fraction of rabbit antisera to bovine prolactin (PRL), intended for in vivo studies on the role of PRL in the rat, was prepared and characterized in vitro and in vivo. The antibodies showed a strong reaction with bovine PRL in double diffusion, immunoelectrophoresis, radioimmunoassay and passive haemagglutination using bovine PRL-coated erythrocytes. In indirect immunofluorescence on paraffin sections of bovine pituitary glands the antibodies could be used for the detection of PRL-producing cells. Cross-reaction with rat PRL was observed in passive haemagglutination with rat PRL-coated erythrocytes and in indirect immunofluorescence on rat pituitary gland, but not in any of the other test systems. The ability of the antibodies to neutralize homologous, i.e. bovine, PRL was tested in lactating rats depleted of endogenous PRL by bromergocriptin treatment. The impaired lactation performance of such animals can be restored by substitution with bovine PRL. If the bovine PRL used for substitution was complexed with anti-bovine PRL-IgG, it lost its biological activity. On the other hand, injections of even high amounts of the antibodies into lactating rats failed to reveal any effect on lactation. It is concluded that either the antibodies do not cross-react with circulating rat PRL in contrast to pituitary PRL (preprolactin?) or that the cross-reacting antibody-populations(s) lack(s) the ability to neutralize the biological function of rat PRL.

Full text

PDF
55

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Clements J. A., Faiman C., Paraskevas F., Reyes F. I., Winter J. S. Development of anti-hLH antibodies after therapy with posterior pituitary extract. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1978 Jul;47(1):1–8. doi: 10.1210/jcem-47-1-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. EMMART E. W., BATES R. W., TURNER W. A. LOCALIZATION OF PROLACTIN IN RAT PITUITARY AND IN A TRANSPLANTABLE MAMMOTROPIC PITUITARY TUMOR USING FLUORESCENT ANTIBODY. J Histochem Cytochem. 1965 Mar;13:182–190. doi: 10.1177/13.3.182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Evans G. A., Hucko J., Rosenfeld M. G. Preprolactin represents the initial product of prolactin mRNA translation. Endocrinology. 1977 Dec;101(6):1807–1814. doi: 10.1210/endo-101-6-1807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gold E. R., Fudenberg H. H. Chromic chloride: a coupling reagent for passive hemagglutination reactions. J Immunol. 1967 Nov;99(5):859–866. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Herzog F., Albini B., Wick G. Comparison of filters used in immunofluorescent staining procedures with fluorescein-isothiocyanate (FITC) conjugates. J Immunol Methods. 1973 Oct;3(2):211–219. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(73)90032-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hunter W. M. Radioimmunoassay and saturation analysis. Preparation and assessment of radioactive tracers. Br Med Bull. 1974 Jan;30(1):18–23. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a071161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jones G. E. Comparative immunological studies between canine prolactin and prolactin from other species. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 1976 Jul;82(3):475–485. doi: 10.1530/acta.0.0820475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kofler R., Wick G., Loewit K. Immunological dissection of rat pregnancy: study of the mode of action of antisera to luteinizing hormone. Clin Exp Immunol. 1977 Aug;29(2):326–333. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kofler R., Wick G. Some methodologic aspects of the chromium chloride method for coupling antigen to erythrocytes. J Immunol Methods. 1977;16(3):201–209. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(77)90198-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Loewit K. K., Laurence K. A. Termination of pregnancy in the rat with rabbit antibovine LH serum. Fertil Steril. 1969 Jul-Aug;20(4):679–688. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)37097-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. McLean B. K., Nikitovitch-Winer M. B. Corpus luteum function in the rat: a critical period for luteal activation and the control of luteal maintenance. Endocrinology. 1973 Aug;93(2):316–323. doi: 10.1210/endo-93-2-316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Morishige W. K., Rothchild I. Temporal aspects of the regulation of corpus luteum function by luteinizing hormone, prolactin and placental luteotrophin during the first half of pregnancy in the rat. Endocrinology. 1974 Jul;95(1):260–274. doi: 10.1210/endo-95-1-260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Purandare T. V., Dattatreymurty B., Munshi S. R., Rao S. S. Immunobiological actions of antiserum to ovine prolactin in mice. J Reprod Fertil. 1975 Sep;44(3):411–419. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0440411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Raj H. G., Moudgal N. R. Hormonal control of gestation in the intact rat. Endocrinology. 1970 Apr;86(4):874–889. doi: 10.1210/endo-86-4-874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sairam M. R., Rao A. J., Li C. H. The use of antiserum to rat prolactin to evaluate its role as luteotrophin in the hamster. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 1975 Jun;79(2):351–356. doi: 10.1530/acta.0.0790351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Schwarz S. Standardisierte Auswertung und Qualitätskontrolle radioimmunologischer Analysen. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1978 Nov 24;90(22):781–789. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Shani J., Goldhaber G., Sulman F. G. Effect of antiserum to rat prolactin on milk yield and food intake in the rat. J Reprod Fertil. 1975 Jun;43(3):571–573. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0430571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical and Experimental Immunology are provided here courtesy of British Society for Immunology

RESOURCES