Skip to main content
PMC home page
Clinical and Experimental Immunology logoLink to Clinical and Experimental Immunology
. 1979 May;36(2):347–354.

The time of day of antigen encounter influences the magnitude of the immune response.

R Pownall, P A Kabler, M S Knapp
PMCID: PMC1537726  PMID: 477035

Abstract

Studies in the rat and in man have shown that the time of day at which an antigen is encountered has an influence on the expression of any subsequent cell-mediated immunity, when the response is measured after a fixed interval. This suggests that immune processes are modulated by intrinsic biological rhythms. Experiments are now reported in which sensitized rats were ear-challenged with oxazolone and studied at intervals during the delayed hypersensitivity reaction. These show that differences in the expression of immunity due to the clock time of challenge became apparent at an early stage and were still present after the maximum response, assessed by the change in ear thickness. The experiments also show that the circadian variations in antigen responsiveness are present during the second recall of immunity and can be manipulated by altering the lighting regimen. The light-dark cycle is often a synchronizer for biological rhythms, although its precise role in the oxazolone system remains to be evaluated. This study demonstrates that phase reversal of the lighting regimen alters the proportions of lymphocytes present in rat blood at two clock times, one of which is the time of day at which the maximum immune response to oxazolone is initiated.

Full text

PDF
347

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allwood G. G. The migratory behavior of T blasts to contact sensitivity reactions in activelyand passively sensitized mice. Immunology. 1975 Apr;28(4):681–692. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Asherson G. L., Zembala M. Inhibitory T cells. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1975;72:55–100. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-66289-8_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cove-Smith J. R., Kabler P., Pownall R., Knapp M. S. Circadian variation in an immune response in man. Br Med J. 1978 Jul 22;2(6132):253–254. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6132.253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Davies A. J. The thymus and the cellular basis of immunity. Transplant Rev. 1969;1:43–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1969.tb00136.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fauci A. S. Mechanisms of corticosteroid action on lymphocyte subpopulations. I. Redistribution of circulating T and b lymphocytes to the bone marrow. Immunology. 1975 Apr;28(4):669–680. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jansa P. Cellular evaluation of hypersensitivity to 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene. Neoplasma. 1977;24(5):529–532. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kostiala A. A. Radiometric ear index test as a measure of delayed-type-hypersensitivity in the rat. Immunology. 1977 Oct;33(4):561–571. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Phanuphak P., Moorhead J. W., Claman H. N. Tolerance and contact sensitivity to DNFB in mice. I. In vivo detection by ear swelling and correlation with in vitro cell stimulation. J Immunol. 1974 Jan;112(1):115–123. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Philippens K. M., von Mayersbach H., Scheving L. E. Effects of the scheduling of meal-feeding at different phases of the circadian system in rats. J Nutr. 1977 Feb;107(2):176–193. doi: 10.1093/jn/107.2.176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pownall R., Knapp M. S. Circadian rhythmicity of delayed hypersensitivity to oxazolone in the rat. Clin Sci Mol Med. 1978 Apr;54(4):447–449. doi: 10.1042/cs0540447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Steel C. M., Evans J., Smith M. A. Physiological variation in circulating B cell:T cell ratio in man. Nature. 1974 Feb 8;247(5440):387–389. doi: 10.1038/247387a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Tavadia H. B., Fleming K. A., Hume P. D., Simpson H. W. Circadian rhythmicity of human plasma cortisol and PHA-induced lymphocyte transformation. Clin Exp Immunol. 1975 Oct;22(1):190–193. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Zembala M., Asherson G. L. Contact sensitivity in the mouse. V. The role of macrophage cytophilic antibody in passive transfer and the effect of trypsin and anti-gamma globulin serum. Cell Immunol. 1970 Sep;1(3):276–289. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(70)90049-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical and Experimental Immunology are provided here courtesy of British Society for Immunology

RESOURCES