Abstract
Twelve out of 96 Veillonella spp. isolated from oral samples harbored tetracycline resistance genes. The most common resistance gene was tet(M). A tet(M)-positive Veillonella dispar strain was shown to transfer a Tn916-like element to four Streptococcus spp. by conjugation at a frequency of 5.2 × 10−6 to 4.5 × 10−5 per recipient.
The tetracyclines are broad-spectrum, bacteriostatic antibiotics used for the treatment of skin, respiratory, and oral infections (18); however, bacterial resistance is limiting their usefulness. The oral cavity harbors a diverse community of microorganisms and has been shown to be a reservoir for antibiotic-resistant bacteria (5, 9, 14). The most widespread tetracycline resistance (Tcr) gene identified from oral bacteria is tet(M) (9, 17, 19). It has been identified in 42 genera (16) and is usually found on conjugative transposons of the Tn916/Tn1545 family (4). Transfer of Tn916-like elements between oral streptococci has been observed (7, 8, 15). However, the role of oral bacteria other than streptococci in the transfer of Tcr genes has not been thoroughly investigated. Previous work has shown that the most prevalent group of tetracycline-resistant oral bacteria, other than the oral streptococci, are Veillonella spp. (9). Veillonella spp. are anaerobic, gram-negative cocci and are residents of the oral cavity, gastrointestinal tract, and vagina (2). The aim of this study was to determine if oral Veillonella spp. harbored transferable Tcr.
Ninety-six Veillonella isolates were tested for Tcr. The isolates were recovered from the dental plaque of 52 healthy subjects who had not received antibiotics in the previous three months (ethical approval 98/56 [Local Health Authority Research and Ethics Committee]). Of these isolates, 12.5% were shown to be tetracycline resistant by agar dilution (12) (MIC ≥ 16 μg/ml), and five different Tcr genes were detected (Table 1) by PCR and sequencing using previously published primers (13, 19). The most common Tcr gene was tet(M), followed by tet(S) (Table 1). Veillonella dispar (34.2A) containing tet(M) was used as a donor of Tcr. The genetic support for tet(M) was demonstrated by PCR. Reactions were carried out to amplify the region from the start of tet(M) to the int gene using previously published primer pairs RT1 and RT2, RT3 and RT4 (15), orf6 (5′ TGGATATTTGTGTCCTGTATGTG) and xis (5′ CGTAGCTTGTTTTCGCCAAT), and intxis1 and intxis2 (15). The results of the PCR and sequencing demonstrated that the tet(M) gene was likely to be contained within a Tn916-like conjugative transposon.
TABLE 1.
Identity of bacterium | No. tested | No. (%) resistant to tetracycline | Tetracycline MIC50 (mg/liter) (range) | No. of isolates from which the indicated Tcr gene was isolated
|
No. of isolates with more than one Tcr gene | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
tet(M) | tet(S) | tet(O) | tet(A) | tet(L) | |||||
Veillonella parvula | 52 | 6 (11.5) | 32 (16-64) | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2a |
Veillonella dispar | 37 | 5 (13.5) | 16 (16-32) | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2b |
Veillonella atypica | 3 | 0 (0) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Unspeciated Veillonella | 4 | 1 (25.0) | 16 (16-32) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 96 | 12 (12.5) | 16 (16-64) | 8 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
One with tet(M) plus tet(L); one with tet(S) plus tet(A).
One with tet(M) plus tet(S); one with tet(M) plus tet(O).
Determination of conjugative transfer of the Tn916-like element from V. dispar to four oral streptococci (Table 2) was achieved by filter-mating and transformation experiments in the presence and absence of DNase I. The donor V. dispar 34.2A (MIC, 32 μg/ml) was grown anaerobically overnight on tetracycline containing anaerobic agar (8 μg/ml; Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, United Kingdom) supplemented with 5% defibrinated horse blood (E&O Laboratories, Bonnybridge, United Kingdom). The four tetracycline-susceptible recipients (MIC ≤ 0.25 μg/ml; Table 2) were grown overnight in air with 5% CO2 on antibiotic-free Columbia blood agar (Oxoid) supplemented with 5% defibrinated horse blood. The cells from these plates were suspended in 20 ml of antibiotic-free brain heart infusion (BHI) broth (Oxoid) and grown overnight at 37°C anaerobically. Ten milliliters of antibiotic-free BHI broth was inoculated with 100 μl of overnight culture and incubated at 37°C until mid-exponential phase (optical density at 600 nm, 0.4 to 0.6). The cultures were centrifuged (1,910 × g) for 10 min, and the supernatant was discarded. The cells were resuspended in 1 ml of BHI broth with or without 50 mg/liter DNase I (3), and 100 μl aliquots from the donor and one of the recipients were spread onto 0.45 μm nitrocellulose filters (Fisher Scientific, London, United Kingdom) on antibiotic-free anaerobic agar and incubated anaerobically overnight at 37°C. To control for transformation (as all the recipients are naturally competent), the pelleted recipient cells were mixed with 371 ng of pAM120 DNA and spread onto filters as described above. The plasmid pAM120 is pGL101 containing Tn916 and flanking DNA on an EcoRI fragment. This plasmid has previously been shown to transform gram-positive cells to have Tcr (6). As with the filter-mating experiments, these transformation experiments were carried out both in the presence and in the absence of DNase I. The filters were removed from the agar plates and placed in sterile universals with 1 ml of prewarmed BHI broth and vortexed (20 s). Aliquots of 100 μl were then spread onto Columbia blood agar plates containing tetracycline (8 μg/ml). These plates were incubated at 37°C for 48 h in air supplemented with 5% CO2, providing selection against the obligate anaerobic donor. Colonies were counted and subcultured onto tetracycline-containing agar to ensure resistance and purity. Putative transconjugants were identified by partial 16S rRNA gene sequencing (10, 20). Sequences were analyzed using relevant databases (1, 11). The presence of the Tn916-like element within the streptococcal transconjugants was confirmed by PCR amplification and sequencing of the tet(M) gene and int and xis (15).
TABLE 2.
Filter-mating expt parameters | No. and type of Tcr isolates | Transfer frequency |
---|---|---|
Streptococcus mitis NCTC 12261 | No spontaneous mutants | |
S. mitis + V. dispar | 1.1 × 103 colonies | 1.6 × 10−6/recipient |
S. mitis + V. dispar + DNase | 2.9 × 103 transconjugants | 4.1 × 10−6/recipient |
S. mitis + pAM120 | 29 transformants | 7.8 × 10−2/ng DNA |
S. mitis + pAM120 + DNase | No transformants | |
S. oralis NCTC 11427 | No spontaneous mutants | |
Streptococcus oralis + V. dispar | 3.3 × 103 colonies | 5.6 × 10−5/recipient |
S. oralis + V. dispar + DNase | 6.7 × 104 transconjugants | 5.7 × 10−5/recipient |
S. oralis + pAM120 | 3,120 transformants | 8.4/ng DNA |
S. oralis + pAM120 + DNase | 6 transformants | 1.6 × 10−2/ng DNA |
Streptococcus parasanguinis NCTC 55898 | No spontaneous mutants | |
S. parasanguinis + V. dispar | 1.8 × 103 colonies | 4.6 × 10−6/recipient |
S. parasanguinis + V. dispar + DNase | 8.0 × 103 transconjugants | 5.2 × 10−6/recipient |
S. parasanguinis + pAM120 | 512 transformants | 1.4/ng DNA |
S. parasanguinis + pAM120 + DNase | 5 transformants | 1.3 × 10−2/ng DNA |
S. salivarius NCTC 8618 | No spontaneous mutants | |
S. salivarius + V. dispar | 2.6 × 103 colonies | 8.7 × 10−5/recipient |
S. salivarius + V. dispar + DNase | 4.6 × 103 transconjugants | 4.5 × 10−5/recipient |
S. salivarius + pAM120 | 22 transformants | 5.9 × 10−2/ng DNA |
S. salivarius + pAM120 + DNase | No transformants |
Results of the filter-mating experiments are shown in Table 2. None of the recipients became spontaneously resistant to tetracycline, and tetracycline-resistant transconjugants (MIC, 32 μg/ml) arose from each of the mating experiments. PCR and sequencing demonstrated that the donor and transconjugants contained identical tet(M), int, and xis genes. DNase I was added to the matings to ensure that transfer occurred by conjugation. Mating experiments in which DNase I was not added were also carried out. The transformation experiments with pAM120 in the absence of DNase I showed that the four recipients were all naturally transformable while incubating on the filters. The same experiment in the presence of DNase I showed a dramatic reduction in the number of transformants (Table 2), confirming the observation that most of the extracellular DNA present during these experiments was being degraded. Therefore, the majority of the transfer observed during these filter-mating experiments was likely to be due to conjugation.
Other studies have shown transfer of Tcr between oral streptococci (7, 8, 15). However, the potential of Veillonella spp. to harbor and transfer Tcr has not previously been investigated. In this study, 12.5% of Veillonella spp. were shown to be tetracycline resistant, and tet(M) was found to be the most common resistance gene. Furthermore, the transfer of tet(M) from V. dispar to four streptococcal species was demonstrated.
Tetracycline-resistant Veillonella spp. have the opportunity to come into close contact with, and consequently transfer resistance elements to, other oral bacteria and bacteria which pass through the oral cavity. Additionally, oral bacteria have the opportunity to transfer from person to person, and this transfer could further allow the spread of a resistant bacterium to a new host and subsequent dissemination of the mobile Tcr genes to susceptible bacteria.
Acknowledgments
We thank Julia Roche for collecting the plaque samples and Lindsay Sharp for help with 16S rRNA gene sequencing.
This work was supported by funding from the Charles Wolfson Trust.
REFERENCES
- 1.Altschul, S. F., T. L. Madden, A. A. Schäffer, J. Zhang, Z. Zhang, W. Miller, and D. J. Lipman. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389-3402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bhatti, M. A., and M. O. Frank. 2000. Veillonella parvula meningitis: case report and review of Veillonella infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 31:839-840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Christie, P. J., R. Z. Korman, S. A. Zahler, J. C. Adsit, and G. M. Dunny. 1987. Two conjugation systems associated with Streptococcus faecalis plasmid pCF10: identification of a conjugative transposon that transfers between S. faecalis and Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 169:2529-2536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Clewell, D. B., S. E. Flannagan, and D. D. Jaworski. 1995. Unconstrained bacterial promiscuity: the Tn916-Tn1545 family of conjugative transposons. Trends Microbiol. 3:229-236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Edlund, C., L. Björkman, J. Ekstrand, G. Sandborgh-Englund, and C. E. Nord. 1996. Resistance of the normal human microflora to mercury and antimicrobials after exposure to mercury from dental amalgam fillings. Clin. Infect. Dis. 22:944-950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gawron-Burke, C., and D. B. Clewell. 1984. Regeneration of insertionally inactivated streptococcal DNA fragments after excision of transposon Tn916 in Escherichia coli: strategy for targeting and cloning of genes from gram-positive bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 159:214-221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hartley, D. L., K. R. Jones, J. A. Tobian, D. J. LeBlanc, and F. L. Macrina. 1984. Disseminated tetracycline resistance in oral streptococci: implication of a conjugative transposon. Infect. Immun. 45:13-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kuramitsu, H. K., and V. Trapa. 1984. Genetic exchange between oral streptococci during mixed growth. J. Gen. Microbiol. 130:2497-2500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lancaster, H., D. Ready, P. Mullany, D. Spratt, R. Bedi, and M. Wilson. 2003. Prevalence and identification of tetracycline-resistant oral bacteria in children not receiving antibiotic therapy. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 228:99-104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lane, D. J. 1996. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing, p. 115-175. In E. Stackebrandt and M. Goodfellow (ed.), Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., Chichester, United Kingdom.
- 11.Maidak, B. L., J. R. Cole, T. G. Lilburn, C. T. Parker, Jr., P. R. Saxman, J. M. Stredwick, G. M. Garrity, B. Li, G. J. Olsen, S. Pramanik, T. M. Schmidt, and J. M. Tiedje. 2000. The RDP (Ribosomal Database Project) continues. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:173-174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2003. Methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria, 5th ed. Approved standard M11-A5. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Villanova, Pa.
- 13.Ng, L. K., I. Martin, M. Alfa, and M. Mulvey. 2001. Multiplex PCR for the detection of tetracycline resistant genes. Mol. Cell. Probes 15:209-215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ready, D., R. Bedi, D. A. Spratt, P. Mullany, and M. Wilson. 2003. Prevalence, proportions, and identities of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in the oral microflora of healthy children. Microb. Drug Resist. 9:367-372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Roberts, A. P., G. Cheah, D. Ready, J. Pratten, M. Wilson, and P. Mullany. 2001. Transfer of Tn916-like elements in microcosm dental plaques. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:2943-2946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Roberts, M. C. 2005.. Update on acquired tetracycline resistance genes. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 245:195-203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Roberts, M. C. 2002. Antibiotic toxicity, interactions and resistance development. Periodontol. 2000. 28:280-297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Smilack, J. D. 1999. The tetracyclines. Mayo Clin. Proc. 74:727-729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Villedieu, A., M. L. Diaz-Torres, M. L. Hunt, R. McNab, D. A. Spratt, M. Wilson, and P. Mullany. 2003. Prevalence of tetracycline resistance genes in oral bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:878-882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wilson, M. J., A. J. Weightman, and W. G. Wade. 1997. Applications of molecular ecology in the characterisation of uncultured microorganisms associated with human disease. Rev. Med. Microbiol. 8:91-101. [Google Scholar]