Skip to main content
Clinical and Experimental Immunology logoLink to Clinical and Experimental Immunology
. 1989 Mar;75(3):461–465.

Local reactivity, local resistance and systemic dissemination in Mycobacterium lepraemurium (MLM) infection.

M Løvik 1, O Closs 1
PMCID: PMC1541963  PMID: 2649294

Abstract

Local reactivity measured as swelling of the infected footpad, local resistance to bacterial multiplication, and capacity to limit systemic dissemination were studied in C57BL, C3H/Bom, C3H/HeJ, and A/Sn mice inoculated with Mycobacterium lepraemurium. C57BL mice developed a strong local reaction with a sudden onset, and effectively limited local multiplication as well as systemic dissemination of bacteria to the liver and spleen as determined 19 weeks after the inoculation. C3H/Bom mice showed no local reaction, had high numbers of bacteria locally, and had extensive systemic dissemination of the infection. C3H/HeJ mice, on the other hand, developed a small local reaction and had less systemic dissemination of bacteria than C3H/Bom mice. In C57BL mice and in the two C3H substrains local reactivity, local resistance to infection, and resistance to systemic spread of the infection paralleled each other. In contrast, A/Sn mice showed a small local reaction, had the most extensive bacterial multiplication at the site of inoculation of the four mouse strains tested, and at the same time were the mice that most effectively restricted systemic dissemination of the infection. Thus, the mechanisms restricting local bacterial multiplication may be different from the mechanisms limiting bacterial dissemination. Neither bacterial growth locally at the site of subcutaneous inoculation in the footpad, nor systemic dissemination of the infection, followed a mouse strain pattern consistent with the Ity/Lsh/Bcg gene model. In experimental mycobacterial infection both local bacterial growth at the site of inoculation and systemic dissemination should be determined.

Full text

PDF
461

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adu H. O., Curtis J., Turk J. L. The resistance of C57BL/6 mice to subcutaneous infection with Mycobacterium lepraemurium is dependent on both T cells and other cells of bone marrow origin. Cell Immunol. 1983 Jun;78(2):249–256. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(83)90279-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown I. N., Glynn A. A., Plant J. Inbred mouse strain resistance to Mycobacterium lepraemurium follows the Ity/Lsh pattern. Immunology. 1982 Sep;47(1):149–156. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown I. N., Glynn A. A. The Ity/Lsh/Bcg gene significantly affects mouse resistance to Mycobacterium lepraemurium. Immunology. 1987 Dec;62(4):587–591. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Closs O. Experimental murine leprosy: growth of Mycobacterium lepraemurium in C3H and C57/BL mice after footpad inoculation. Infect Immun. 1975 Sep;12(3):480–489. doi: 10.1128/iai.12.3.480-489.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Closs O., Haugen O. A. Experimental murine leprosy. 2. Further evidence for varying susceptibility of outbred mice and evaluation of the response of 5 inbred mouse strains to infection with Mycobacterium lepraemurium. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand A. 1974 Jul;82(4):459–474. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Closs O., Haugen O. A. Experimental murine leprosy. 3. Early local reaction to mycobacterium lepraemurium in C3H and C57/BL mice. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand A. 1975 Jan;83(1):51–58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Closs O., Løvik M., Wigzell H., Taylor B. A. H-2-linked gene(s) influence the granulomatous reaction to viable Mycobacterium lepraemurium in the mouse. Scand J Immunol. 1983 Jul;18(1):59–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.1983.tb00836.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Curtis J., Adu H. O., Turk J. L. A lack of correlation between antigen-specific cellular reactions and resistance to Mycobacterium lepraemurium infection in mice. Immunology. 1981 Jun;43(2):293–301. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Curtis J., Akuffo-Adu H., Turk J. L. H-2-linked genes which modify resistance of C57BL/10 mice to subcutaneous infection with Mycobacterium lepraemurium. Infect Immun. 1984 Dec;46(3):635–638. doi: 10.1128/iai.46.3.635-638.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gros P., Skamene E., Forget A. Genetic control of natural resistance to Mycobacterium bovis (BCG) in mice. J Immunol. 1981 Dec;127(6):2417–2421. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hoffenbach A., Bach M. A. Bacillary growth, interleukin 2 production defect, and specific antibody secretion governed by different genetical factors in mice infected subcutaneously with Mycobacterium lepraemurium. Cell Immunol. 1986 Oct 15;102(2):273–286. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(86)90421-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hoffenbach A., Lagrange P. H., Bach M. A. Strain variation of lymphokine production and specific antibody secretion in mice infected with Mycobacterium lepraemurium. Cell Immunol. 1985 Mar;91(1):1–11. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(85)90026-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. KAWAGUCHI Y. Classification of mouse leprosy. Jpn J Exp Med. 1959 Dec;29:651–663. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lagrange P. H. Active or passive acquired resistance after Mycobacterium lepraemurium infection in C57BL/6 and C3H/HeN mice. Ann Immunol (Paris) 1979 Jul-Aug;130C(4):561–579. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lagrange P. H., Hurtrel B. Local immune response to Mycobacterium lepraemurium in C3H and C57Bl/6 mice. Clin Exp Immunol. 1979 Dec;38(3):461–474. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lissner C. R., Weinstein D. L., O'Brien A. D. Mouse chromosome 1 Ity locus regulates microbicidal activity of isolated peritoneal macrophages against a diverse group of intracellular and extracellular bacteria. J Immunol. 1985 Jul;135(1):544–547. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Løvik M., Closs O. M., Haugen O. A. Immunization of highly susceptible C3H mice with ultrasonicated Mycobacterium lepraemurium (MLM) bacilli facilitates the development of increased resistance during MLM infection. Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 1984 Sep;52(3):351–361. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Løvik M., Closs O. Effect of BCG vaccination on Mycobacterium lepraemurium infection in a highly susceptible inbred mouse strain. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand C. 1981 Apr;89(2):133–138. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1981.tb02676.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Løvik M., Closs O. Induction of delayed type hypersensitivity against ultrasonicated Mycobacterium lepraemurium bacilli without simultaneous local reactivity against live bacilli or protective immunity. Clin Exp Immunol. 1983 Aug;53(2):319–327. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Løvik M., Closs O. Induction of immunity against live Mycobacterium lepraemurium: a requirement for viable bacilli? Immunology. 1984 Sep;53(1):165–173. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Løvik M., Collins F. M., Closs O. Inbred C3H mouse substrain differences demonstrated in experimental murine leprosy. Immunogenetics. 1982;16(6):607–611. doi: 10.1007/BF00372030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Løvik M. Experimental murine leprosy and its relevance for the study of resistance to mycobacterial infections in man. Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 1987 Dec;55(4):689–701. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Løvik M., Haugen O. A., Closs O. Delayed-type hypersensitivity after immunization with ultrasonicated Mycobacterium lepraemurium in C3H and C57BL mice. Scand J Immunol. 1984 Sep;20(3):227–235. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.1984.tb00996.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Løvik M., North R. J. Effect of aging on antimicrobial immunity: old mice display a normal capacity for generating protective T cells and immunologic memory in response to infection with Listeria monocytogenes. J Immunol. 1985 Nov;135(5):3479–3486. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Morozumi P. A., Brummer E., Stevens D. A. Strain differences in resistance to infection reversed by route of challenge: studies in blastomycosis. Infect Immun. 1981 Nov;34(2):623–625. doi: 10.1128/iai.34.2.623-625.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Musa S. A., Kim Y., Hashim R., Wang G. Z., Dimmer C., Smith D. W. Response of inbred mice to aerosol challenge with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infect Immun. 1987 Aug;55(8):1862–1866. doi: 10.1128/iai.55.8.1862-1866.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sansonetti P., Lagrange P. H. The immunology of leprosy: speculations on the leprosy spectrum. Rev Infect Dis. 1981 May-Jun;3(3):422–469. doi: 10.1093/clinids/3.3.422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Skamene E., Gros P., Forget A., Patel P. J., Nesbitt M. N. Regulation of resistance to leprosy by chromosome 1 locus in the mouse. Immunogenetics. 1984;19(2):117–124. doi: 10.1007/BF00387854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Stach J. L., Delgado G., Strobel M., Millan J., Lagrange P. H. Preliminary evidence of natural resistance to Mycobacterium bovis (BCG) in lepromatous leprosy. Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 1984 Jun;52(2):140–146. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Turcotte R., Chaput J., Lemieux S. Enhancement of resistance in Mycobacterium lepraemurium infected C3H mice by treatment with sonicated M. lepraemurium or splenectomy. Clin Exp Immunol. 1984 Apr;56(1):97–104. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Turcotte R. Influence of route of Mycobacterium lepraemurium injection on susceptibility to mouse leprosy and on lymphoblastic transformation. Infect Immun. 1980 Jun;28(3):660–668. doi: 10.1128/iai.28.3.660-668.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical and Experimental Immunology are provided here courtesy of British Society for Immunology

RESOURCES