Abstract
The foot length, occipito-frontal head circumference (OFC), crown-rump, and crown-heel length (CHL) of 123 neonates of gestational ages 26-42 weeks, were measured between 12 hours and 5 days. A gauge, designed and constructed at St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, was used to measure foot length. In term babies (37-42 weeks) who were of weights appropriate for gestational age (AGA) the scatter about the mean of foot length measurements was small (coefficient of variation = 4.5%) compared with birthweight (coefficient of variation = 12.0%). The wide range of foot length measurements in babies of different gestational ages prevented maturity being accurately estimated. The mean birthweight of term light-for-dates (LFD) babies was 30.9% lower than term AGA babies, whereas the mean foot length, OFC, and body length of LFD babies was reduced by only 4.2-8.8%. There was a positive linear correlation between foot length and other indices of body size in LFD and AGA babies of all gestational ages. However, in premature babies (less than 37 weeks) the correlation between foot length and birthweight (r = 0.95) and foot length and CHL (r = 0.96) was pronounced. The 95% confidence limits of the regression lines were +/- 327 g and +/- 2.3 cm respectively. Birthweight and CHL of premature babies can therefore be estimated from a measurement of foot length that is performed simply and rapidly. Measurements of foot length are valuable in premature babies who are too ill at birth for conventional anthropometric measurements to be made, and in whom such measurements cannot be carried out subsequently because of the encumbrance of the incubator and intensive care apparatus. Drug dosages and intravenous fluid requirements based on body weight or surface area can be indirectly calculated from a measurement of foot length.
Full text
PDF
Images in this article
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Davies D. P., Holding R. E. Neonatometer: a new infant length measurer. Arch Dis Child. 1972 Dec;47(256):938–940. doi: 10.1136/adc.47.256.938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Helmuth H. Body height, foot size and the secular trend in growth. Z Morphol Anthropol. 1974 Jun;66(1):31–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Járai I., Mestyán J., Schultz K., Lázár A., Halász M., Krassy I. Body size and neonatal hypoglycemia in intrauterine growth retardation. Early Hum Dev. 1977 Oct;1(1):25–38. doi: 10.1016/0378-3782(77)90027-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Markowski B., Lawler S. D. Use of early fetal tissues obtained from suction termination of pregnancy. Lancet. 1977 Jan 22;1(8004):186–188. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(77)91778-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Milner R. D., Richards B. An analysis of birth weight by gestational age of infants born in England and Wales, 1967 to 1971. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1974 Dec;81(12):956–967. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1974.tb00414.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- POSPISILOVA-ZUZAKOVA V. [Determination of the body length of the fetus with the aid of the length of the sole of the foot]. Biologia (Bratisl) 1962;17:49–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Russel J. G. Radiological assessment of fetal maturity. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1969 Mar;76(3):208–219. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]