Abstract
A randomised and double blind study of 100 subjects and 50 controls was performed to confirm or refute a report from Cardiff in 1975 that continuous Doppler ultrasound, as used in fetal heart rate monitoring, increases fetal movement by over 90%. The results showed such an effect to be most unlikely (power greater than 0.99). A total of 150 pregnant mothers recorded fetal movements for 30 minutes while connected to a specially modified cardiotocograph, the ultrasound being switched on at random for either the first or second 15 minutes in 100 of the patients. The mean difference in 15 minute movement count, with and without ultrasound, among the 100 patients was 0.2 of a movement (SD 12.7; p greater than 0.6 by two tailed Wilcoxon matched pairs signed ranks test). The control group showed a mean difference of 2.6 movements (SD 12.1; p greater than 0.2). Results of a pilot study suggested that the observations in the earlier report may have been influenced by mechanisms unrelated to ultrasound.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Altman D. G. Statistics and ethics in medical research: III How large a sample? Br Med J. 1980 Nov 15;281(6251):1336–1338. doi: 10.1136/bmj.281.6251.1336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hertogs K., Roberts A. B., Cooper D., Griffin D. R., Campbell S. Maternal perception of fetal motor activity. Br Med J. 1979 Nov 10;2(6199):1183–1185. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6199.1183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hertz R. H., Timor-Tritsch I., Dierker L. J., Jr, Chik L., Rosen M. G. Continuous ultrasound and fetal movement. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979 Sep 1;135(1):152–154. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Phillips W. D., Towell M. E. Doppler ultrasound and subjective assessment of fetal activity. Br Med J. 1979 Jul 14;2(6182):101–102. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6182.101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rayburn W. F. Clinical significance of perceptible fetal motion. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Sep 15;138(2):210–212. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(80)90037-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sadovsky E., Mahler Y., Polishuk W. Z., Malkin A. Correlation between electromagnetic recording and maternal assessment of fetal movement. Lancet. 1973 May 26;1(7813):1141–1143. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(73)91144-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thaler I., Goodman J. D., Dawes G. S. Effects of maternal cigarette smoking on fetal breathing and fetal movements. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Oct 1;138(3):282–287. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(80)90249-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wood C., Walters W. A., Trigg P. Methods of recording fetal movement. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1977 Aug;84(8):561–567. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1977.tb12653.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]