Skip to main content
British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.) logoLink to British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.)
. 1983 Jun 4;286(6380):1796–1798. doi: 10.1136/bmj.286.6380.1796

Thirty years on: examination performance and career success of the 1950-1 intake of Cambridge medical students.

R Wakeford, S Roberts
PMCID: PMC1548057  PMID: 6407573

Abstract

The relation between preclinical tripos and clinical examination results and subsequent career success of 188 medical graduates of Cambridge University was measured using five indicators of success. A generally positive relation was found, but this was not specific enough to make accurate individual predictions. Present levels of appointment were more closely related to clinical than preclinical results. No support was found for the local assertion that "2.1s" do better than "firsts" in clinical medicine. Since undergraduate examination results seem to be inaccurate predictors of later performance they should not be used as the principal evidence in making selection decisions.

Full text

PDF

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bennett M., Wakeford R. Health policy, student selection and curriculum reform. Health Policy Educ. 1982 Jul;3(2):173–181. doi: 10.1016/0165-2281(82)90035-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dodd N. Follow-up study of male Liverpool graduates. Med Educ. 1978 Mar;12(2):124–127. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1978.tb00646.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Egerton E. A. Survey of Queen's University medical graduates. Ulster Med J. 1980;49(2):112–125. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fruen M. A., Chipman M., Steiner J. W. Attrition from general practice: career patterns of Toronto medical school graduates. J Med Educ. 1977 Jun;52(6):494–499. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hobfoll S. E., Benor D. E. Prediction of student clinical performance. Med Educ. 1981 Jul;15(4):231–236. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1981.tb02638.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Keck J. W., Arnold L., Willoughby L., Calkins V. Efficacy of cognitive/noncognitive measures in predicting resident-physician performance. J Med Educ. 1979 Oct;54(10):759–765. doi: 10.1097/00001888-197910000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Last J. M., Martin F. M., Stanely G. R. Academic record and subsequent career. Proc R Soc Med. 1967 Aug;60(8):813–816. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. McManus I. C. A-level grades and medical school admission. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1982 May 29;284(6329):1654–1656. doi: 10.1136/bmj.284.6329.1654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Murden R., Galloway G. M., Reid J. C., Colwill J. M. Academic and personal predictors of clinical success in medical school. J Med Educ. 1978 Sep;53(9):711–719. doi: 10.1097/00001888-197809000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Nadelson C. C., Notman M. T., Lowenstein P. A follow-up study of Harvard Medical School graduates, 1967-1977. J Am Med Womens Assoc. 1981 Feb;36(2):51–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Parkhouse J., Howard M. A follow-up of the career preferences of Manchester and Sheffield graduates of 1972 and 1973. Med Educ. 1978 Sep;12(5):377–381. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1978.tb00499.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Richardson I. M. Examination performance and the future careers of Aberdeen medical graduates. Med Educ. 1980 Sep;14(5):356–359. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1980.tb02381.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Veloski J., Herman M. W., Gonnella J. S., Zeleznik C., Kellow W. F. Relationships between performance in medical school and first postgraduate year. J Med Educ. 1979 Dec;54(12):909–916. doi: 10.1097/00001888-197912000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wilson H. D. A hundred years of the Ettles scholarship at the University of Edinburgh or "Whatever happened to the likely lads (and lasses)?". Med Educ. 1981 Nov;15(6):359–362. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1981.tb02414.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Medical Journal (Clinical research ed.) are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES