Abstract
The scanning electron microscope is capable of 25 mμ resolution combined with a great depth of focus, features which make the technique of value in the study of the intestinal mucosa. Surgical biopsies and postmortem specimens of small intestine have been examined using scanning and transmission electron microscopy. In biopsies, at low magnification, the villous pattern is seen while at higher magnification details of cell surfaces may be observed. Some features are best observed using scanning microscopy to examine dewaxed thick histological sections. In necropsy specimens villous architecture can still be satisfactorily assessed and details of the villous cores are seen, their collagen skeletons apparently less robust than the villi of the fresh biopsy. Scanning microscopy can extend the three-dimensional study of the small intestinal mucosa beyond the limits imposed by the resolution of the dissecting microscope.
Full text
PDF










Images in this article
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Creamer B., Leppard P. Post-mortem examination of a small intestine in the coeliac syndrome. Gut. 1965 Oct;6(5):466–471. doi: 10.1136/gut.6.5.466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Demling L., Becker V., Classen M. Examinations of the mucosa of the small intestine with the scanning electron microscope. Digestion. 1969;2(1):51–60. doi: 10.1159/000196920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ferguson A., Maxwell J. D., Carr K. E. Progressive changes in the small-intestinal villous pattern with increasing length of gestation. J Pathol. 1969 Sep;99(1):87–91. doi: 10.1002/path.1710990112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johansson E. D. Progesterone level and response to oxytocin at term. Lancet. 1968 Sep 7;2(7567):570–570. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(68)92430-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Loehry C. A., Creamer B. Post-mortem Study of Small-intestinal Mucosa. Br Med J. 1966 Apr 2;1(5491):820.2–82829. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5491.820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Loehry C. A., Creamer B. Three-demensional structure of the rat small intestinal mucosa related to mucosal dynamics. I. Mucosal structure and dynamics in the rat after the administration of methotrexate. Gut. 1969 Feb;10(2):112–116. doi: 10.1136/gut.10.2.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marsh M. N., Swift J. A., Williams E. D. Studies of small-intestinal mucosa with the scanning electron microscope. Br Med J. 1968 Oct 12;4(5623):95–96. doi: 10.1136/bmj.4.5623.94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rubin C. E., Dobbins W. O., 3rd Peroral biopsy of the small intestine. A review of its diagnostic usefulness. Gastroenterology. 1965 Dec;49(6):676–697. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- SHINER M. Duodenal and jejunal biopsies. I. A discussion of the method, its difficulties and applications. Gastroenterology. 1957 Jul;33(1):64–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- SHINER M. Jejunal-biopsy tube. Lancet. 1956 Jan 14;270(6907):85–85. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(56)92137-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Toner P. G., Carr K. E. The use of scanning electron microscopy in the study of the intestinal villi. J Pathol. 1969 Apr;97(4):611–617. doi: 10.1002/path.1710970405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Toner P. G. Cytology of intestinal epithelial cells. Int Rev Cytol. 1968;24:233–343. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)61401-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Trier J. S., Rubin C. E. Electron microscopy of the small intestine: a review. Gastroenterology. 1965 Nov;49(5):574–603. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]














