Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
letter
. 2006 Aug 26;333(7565):446–447. doi: 10.1136/bmj.333.7565.446-c

Managing conjunctivitis in general practice

Research into management strategies for acute infective conjunctivitis

Scott J Robbie 1,2,3,4, Kashif Qureshi 1,2,3,4, Shahram Kashani 1,2,3,4, Muhammad A Qureshi 1,2,3,4
PMCID: PMC1553501  PMID: 16931847

Editor—Neither Everitt et al nor Rietveld et al seem to have consulted an ophthalmologist when designing their studies.1,2 There is little evidence base to back up the clinical features of a condition that many practitioners take for granted. Ophthalmologists, in particular, are aware that adenoviral conjunctivitis tends to follow a distinct clinical pattern: patients often complain of watering and “grittiness” (initially in one eye before involvement of the other), and on closer questioning it often becomes apparent that other family members or work colleagues have had a similar problem. Pre-auricular lymphadenopathy is also a helpful sign. Symptoms may take up to three weeks to resolve, and the patient has not uncommonly been using topical antibiotics for a protracted period at the time of referral—these contain preservatives that may trigger an allergic response in an already inflamed eye, thereby exacerbating the patient's symptoms. A diagnosis of chlamydial conjunctivitis or allergic conjunctivitis is more likely to be made in intractable cases than one of bacterial conjunctivitis. In addition, given the plethora of bacterial commensals in the eye, the temptation to treat a swab result rather than the patient should be resisted.

Incorporating these key features of the patient history and examination into their analyses might have strengthened the results of both studies. Rietveld et al established that if a patient has had sticky eyes on waking then he or she is more likely to have a positive bacterial culture. This does not necessarily translate into a diagnosis of bacterial conjunctivitis. The diagnosis of acute infective conjunctivitis in the study by Everitt et al is too broad. Identifying the exact nature of the pathogen associated with specific symptoms or signs would be valuable in this context, and not particularly difficult to do.3-5 Often it is possible to identify the cause of conjunctivitis by virtue of a good history and basic examination alone. A move away from widespread empirical use of antibiotics for acute conjunctivitis is to be welcomed, not least because minimising patients' attendance at general practices and eye clinics should help reduce the spread of outbreaks.

Competing interests: None declared.

References

  • 1.Everitt HA, Little PS, Smith PWF. A randomised controlled trial of management strategies for acute infective conjunctivitis in general practice. BMJ 2006;333: 321. (12 August.) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rietveld RP, ter Riet G, Bindels PJ, Sloos JH, van Weert HC. Predicting bacterial cause in infectious conjunctivitis: cohort study on informativeness of combinations of signs and symptoms. BMJ 2004;329: 206-10. Epub 2004 Jun 16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Percivalle E, Sarasini A, Torsellini M, Bruschi L, Antoniazzi E, Grazia Revello M, et al. A comparison of methods for detecting adenovirus type 8 keratoconjunctivitis during a nosocomial outbreak in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Clin Virol 2003;28: 257-64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Weitgasser U, Haller EM, El-Shabrawi Y. Evaluation of polymerase chain reaction for the detection of adenoviruses in conjunctival swab specimens using degenerate primers in comparison with direct immunofluorescence. Ophthalmologica 2002;216: 329-32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Watanabe Y, Uchio E, Itoh N, Usui N, Nakagawa H, Inoue K, et al. Bacterial infection in the conjunctiva of patients with adenoviral conjunctivitis. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2001;45: 115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES