Skip to main content
Immunology logoLink to Immunology
. 1982 Aug;46(4):697–704.

The in vitro generation of suppressor lymphocytes involves interactions between PNA+ and PNA- thymocyte populations.

A Eisenthal, D Nachitgal, M Feldman
PMCID: PMC1555484  PMID: 6213552

Abstract

Employing cell fractionation with the aid of peanut agglutinin, it was found that at least two subpopulations of T cells are required for the generation of suppressor T lymphocytes in culture. The co-operation of these two subpopulations, the medullary and the cortical types of thymocytes, is required for the induction phase but it apparently plays no role in the expression of the suppressive effect. With the aid of genetic markers, it was found that in medullary-type, cortisone-resistant, PNA-negative T cell was the progenitor of the suppressor lymphocytes, while the cortical type cells performed an accessory (regulatory?) function. Finally, it was observed that allostimulation of T cells in culture give rise to both 'helper' and suppressor cells. The generation of 'helper' lymphocytes requires allostimulation for less than 24 hr while the induction of suppressor cells requires a longer period of stimulation which leads in the end to predominance of the suppressor effect.

Full text

PDF
697

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bach J. F. The mode of action of thymic hormones and its relevance to T-cell differentiation. Transplant Proc. 1976 Jun;8(2):243–248. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Betel I., Mathieson B. J., Sharrow S. O., Asofsky R. Distribution of Lyt phenotypes in thymocyte subpopulations as measured by flow microfluorometry: selective enrichment of Lyt 1+23- thymocytes. J Immunol. 1980 May;124(5):2209–2217. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blomgren H., Andersson B. Evidence for a small pool of immunocompetent cells in the mouse thymus. Exp Cell Res. 1969 Oct;57(2):185–192. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(69)90140-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blomgren H., Svedmyr E. In vitro stimulation of mouse thymus cells by PHA and allogeneic cells. Cell Immunol. 1971 Aug;2(4):285–299. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(71)90063-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chan E. L., Henry C. Coexistence of helper and suppressor activities in carrier-primed spleen cells. J Immunol. 1976 Oct;117(4):1132–1138. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Davidson W. F., Parish C. R. A procedure for removing red cells and dead cells from lymphoid cell suspensions. J Immunol Methods. 1975 Jun;7(2-3):291–300. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(75)90026-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Droege W. Amplifying and suppressive effect of thymus cells. Nature. 1971 Dec 31;234(5331):549–551. doi: 10.1038/234549a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Eisenthal A., Nachtigal D., Feldman M. Induction of allospecific suppressor T cells in vitro. Cell Immunol. 1977 Nov;34(1):112–124. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(77)90234-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Feldmann M., Beverley P. C., Woody J., McKenzie I. F. T-T interactions in the induction of suppressor and helper T cells: analysis of membrane phenotype of precursor and amplifier cells. J Exp Med. 1977 Apr 1;145(4):793–801. doi: 10.1084/jem.145.4.793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Feldmann M., Kontiainen S. Suppressor cell induction in vitro. II. Cellular requirements of suppressor cell induction. Eur J Immunol. 1976 Apr;6(4):302–305. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830060413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gershon R. K., Kondo K. Cell interactions in the induction of tolerance: the role of thymic lymphocytes. Immunology. 1970 May;18(5):723–737. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gershon R. K., Kondo K. Infectious immunological tolerance. Immunology. 1971 Dec;21(6):903–914. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gershon R. K. T cell control of antibody production. Contemp Top Immunobiol. 1974;3:1–40. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-3045-5_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hardt C., Pfizenmaier K., Röllinghoff M., Klein J., Wagner H. Alloreactive and H-2-restricted Lyt 23 cytotoxic T lymphocytes derive from a common pool of antecedent Lyt 123 precursors. J Exp Med. 1980 Nov 1;152(5):1413–1418. doi: 10.1084/jem.152.5.1413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hirano T., Nordin A. A. Cell-mediated immune response in vitro. I. The development of suppressor cells and cytotoxic lymphocytes in mixed lymphocyte cultures. J Immunol. 1976 Apr;116(4):1115–1122. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Horiuchi A., Waksman B. H. Role of the thymus in tolerance. 8. Relative effectiveness of nonaggregated and heat-aggregated bovine gamma globulin, injected directly into lymphoid organs of normal rats, in suppressing immune responsiveness. J Immunol. 1968 Dec;101(6):1322–1332. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Imai Y., Oguchi T., Nakano T., Osawa T. Separation of mouse T cell subsets by a fluorescent activated cell sorter using fluorescence-labeled peanut agglutinin. Immunol Commun. 1979;8(5-6):495–503. doi: 10.3109/08820137909063248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Irlé C., Piguet P. F., Vassalli P. In vitro maturation of immature thymocytes into immunocompetent T cells in the absence of direct thymic influence. J Exp Med. 1978 Jul 1;148(1):32–45. doi: 10.1084/jem.148.1.32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kontiainen S., Feldmann M. Suppressor cell induction in vitro. I. Kinetics of induction of antigen-specific suppressor cells. Eur J Immunol. 1976 Apr;6(4):296–301. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830060412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kruisbeek A. M., Zijlstra J. J., Kröse T. J. Distinct effects of T cell growth factors and thymic epithelial factors on the generation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes by thymocyte subpopulations. J Immunol. 1980 Sep;125(3):995–1002. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. London J., Berrih S., Bach J. F. Peanut agglutinin. I. A new tool for studying T lymphocyte subpopulations. J Immunol. 1978 Aug;121(2):438–443. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mathieson B. J., Sharrow S. O., Campbell P. S., Asofsky R. An Lyt differentiated thymocyte subpopulation detected by flow microfluorometry. Nature. 1979 Feb 8;277(5696):478–480. doi: 10.1038/277478a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Nachtigal D., Zan-Bar I., Feldman M. The role of specific suppressor T cells in immune tolerance. Transplant Rev. 1975;26:87–105. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1975.tb00176.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Nakano T., Imai Y., Naiki M., Osawa T. Characterization of mouse helper and suppressor T cell subsets separated by lectins. J Immunol. 1980 Nov;125(5):1928–1932. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Peavy D. L., Pierce C. W. Cell-mediated immune responses in vitro. I. Suppression of the generation of cytotoxic lymphocytes by concanavalin A and concanavalin A-activated spleen cells. J Exp Med. 1974 Aug 1;140(2):356–369. doi: 10.1084/jem.140.2.356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rabinovich H., Umiel T., Reisner Y., Sharon N., Globerson A. Characterization of embryonic liver suppressor cells by peanut agglutinin. Cell Immunol. 1979 Oct;47(2):347–355. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(79)90344-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Reisner Y., Linker-Israeli M., Sharon N. Separation of mouse thymocytes into two subpopulations by the use of peanut agglutinin. Cell Immunol. 1976 Jul;25(1):129–134. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(76)90103-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Shortman K., Von Boehmer H., Lipp J., Hopper K. Subpopulations of T-lymphocytes. Physical separation, functional specialisation and differentiation pathways of sub-sets of thymocytes and thymus-dependent peripheral lymphocytes. Transplant Rev. 1975;25:163–210. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Whisler R. L., Stobo J. D. Heterogeneity of murine regulatory T cells. I. Subpopulations of amplifier and suppressor T cells. J Exp Med. 1976 Aug 1;144(2):398–413. doi: 10.1084/jem.144.2.398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Immunology are provided here courtesy of British Society for Immunology

RESOURCES